(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 7145-7153 | Article Number: ijese.2016.533
Published Online: September 17, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the researched problem is caused by the fact that diversification is one of the best options for reforming enterprises. The aim of the research: to consider changes in production of outputs in development cycles of the enterprise. This will help to reveal the nature of manufacture diversification. The leading method to the research of this problem is the system approach, which allows to elicit factors promoting formation of business mechanism of manufacture diversification under the conditions of volatile economic environment. The results of the research are: it is offered to enhance the existing classification of enterprises by nomenclative and technological characteristic, taking into account the specific nature of processing capacity. The materials of the research can be useful for control bodies of enterprises when taking constructive steps in the sphere of manufacture diversification and strategy development.
Keywords: Cyclical pattern of development, manufacture diversification, resource base of enterprise, nomenclative characteristic, processing capacity
References
Ansoph, I. (1999). New corporate strategy. St.Petersburg: Piterkom, 128 p.
Ashmarina, S. I., Streltsov, A. V., Dorozhkin, E.M., M. Vochozka & Izmailov, A. M. (2016). Organizational and Economic Directions of Competitive Recovery of Russian Pharmaceutical Enterprises. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11 (7), 2581-2591.
Gort, M. (1962). Diversification and integration in American industry. Prinston: Prinston University Press, 132 p.
Greiner, L. (1998). Evolution and Revolution as Organizations Grow. Harvard Business Review, 5, 134-143.
Kalimullin, D. M. (2015). Formulization of diagnostic instrumentarium for defining readiness of enterprise to organizational adjustments. Vestnik of Samara State University, 4, 75.
Kleiner, G. B., Tambovtsev, V. L. & Kachalov, M. I. (1997). Enterprises in unsustainable economic environment: risks, strategy, security. Moscow: Economics, 129 p.
Kotler, F. (1996). Marketing fundamentals. Moscow: Rostinter, 584 p.
Kunyavskii, М. Е. & Kublin, I. М. (1997). Business problems of manufacture diversification. Saratov: Publishing center Saratov State Academy of Economics, 125 p.
Plotnikov, A. P. & Pavlov, N. N. (2016). Diversification mechanism of enterprise development. Vestnik of Samara State University, 3(137), 38-40.
Prudsky, V. G., Elokhov, A. М. & Kovshov, V. S. (2007). Strategic management. Perm: Perm State University, 254 p.
Tatarskikh, B. Y. & Fedorov, О. V. (2016). Business problems of increasing innovative potential of the Russsian machine-building complex. Vestnik of Samara State University, 3, 16-23.
Trubchanin, V. V. (2013). Manufacture diversification mechanism of production plants. Institute of Industrial Economics of NAS Ukraine, 1(4), 213 p.
Yoshinara, E., Sakuma, A. & Kami, K. (1979). Diversification strategy in the Japanese enterprise. Nippon: Keirai, 133 p.
Zavodchikov , D.P., Sharov, A. A. , Chistik, O.F. , Larionov, I.V. and Naumova, O.A. (2016). The Relationship of Time Perspective and Subjective Perceptions of Students as the Empirical Base for Individualization of the Educational Path. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11 (7), 2678-2701.