Assessment of Entrepreneurial Territorial Attractiveness by The Ranking Method

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Gavrilova, Shepelev, Kosyakova, Belikova & Chistik, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Gavrilova, M.A., Shepelev, V.M., Kosyakova, I.V., Belikova, L.F. & Chistik, O.F. (2016). Assessment of Entrepreneurial Territorial Attractiveness by The Ranking Method. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), 6866-6875.

Harvard
In-text: (Gavrilova, Shepelev, Kosyakova, Belikova and Chistik, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Gavrilova, M., Shepelev, V., Kosyakova, I., Belikova, L. and Chistik, O. (2016). Assessment of Entrepreneurial Territorial Attractiveness by The Ranking Method. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(14), pp. 6866-6875.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Gavrilova, Shepelev, Kosyakova, Belikova and Chistik 2016)
Your Bibliography: Gavrilova, Marina A., Victor M. Shepelev, Inessa V. Kosyakova, Lyudmila F. Belikova and Olga F. Chistik (2016). "Assessment of Entrepreneurial Territorial Attractiveness by The Ranking Method". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (14):6866-6875.

Abstract

The relevance of the researched problem is caused by existence of differentiation in development of separate regional units (urban districts and municipalities) within the region. The aim of this article is to offer a method, which determines the level of differentiation in development of various components of the region, and also in producing a set of recommendations for local government administration to achieve higher level in development of their territories. The leading approach to the research of this problem is the ranking method of regional units according to cumulative socioeconomic potential and integral risk. The results of the research are: the estimation procedure for entrepreneurial territorial attractiveness is offered and tried out, with the use of municipal formations of the Samara region as an example; the advantages and "bottlenecks" in development of the concrete urban district are educed; specific measures for realization of advantages and (or) elimination of "bottlenecks" are offered. The materials of the research can be useful for developing strategy for improvement of the region by regional public authorities, for leveling-off of social and economic differentiation of separate regional units, and also for developing of scientifically based municipal programs of support and development of entrepreneurship.

Keywords: Entrepreneurial territorial attractiveness, socioeconomic potential, integral risk, ranking method

References

Boari, C., Elfring, T. & Xavier, F. (2016). Entrepreneurship and Cluster Dynamics. New York: Routlege, 345 p.

Ezmale, S. (2012). Strategıes for enhancıng attractıveness of the cıtıes ın latgale regıon. European ıntegratıon studıes, 6, 121-127.

Falco, S. E., Cucari, N. & Cirillo, M. R. (2015). The terrıtoryattractıveness as a factor for competıtıveness. The t-Forum of Global Conference Tourism Intellegence in Action, 1-21.

Fetisov, G. G. & Oreshin, V. P. (2012). Regional Economics and Management. Moscow: INFRA-M, 416.

Hamri, H. M., Ouariti, O. Z. & Sadiqui, A.(2014). Territory Attractiveness Case of Souss-Massa-Draa Region. International Journal of Research in Management & Business Studies, 1(4), 27-31.

Samara Statistical Catalogue. (2015). Samara: Stat.cb.Samarastat, 355. p

The rating of investment attractiveness of the regions in 2015. 2015. Expert RA. Direct access: http://raexpert.ru/ratings/regions/2015