(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 6760-6773 | Article Number: ijese.2016.507
Published Online: September 13, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the researched problem is caused by the increasing interest in using potential of transdisciplinary approaches, and mathematical methods, which include the game theory in analysis of public and economic processes. The aim of the article is studying a possibility of implementation of the transdisciplinary approaches in economic researches. The leading approach is institutional and evolutionary, which allows to reveal such tendencies of relationship development and interrelations of individuals that remain hidden and implicit. It also allows to receive new and quite unexpected important results, significant for practice. In the article the hypothesis is proved. According to it, innovations, its generation and autopoiesis itself are structural units. In the innovative environment it assumes various forms. The materials of the article can be useful for development of the theory of the system analysis, and also when developing macroeconomic forecasts of social and economic development.
Keywords: Methodologic monism, mathematical methods, game theory, transdisciplinary approaches
References
Borel, E. (1969). Probability and consistency. Мoscow: INFRAN, 352 p.
Grebenshchikova, Е.G. (2012). The transdisciplinary paradigm of innovation studies: recontextualization of expert evaluation and the problem of responsibility. Мoscow: Publishing house of Moscow University for the Humanities, 311 p.
Judge, A. (1994). Conference Paper. 1st World Congress of Transdisciplinarity. Union of International Associations, 5, 45-48.
Kiyashchenko, L. P. (2009). Philosophy of transdisciplinarity. Мoscow: INFRAN, 355 p.
Lawrence, R. (2004). Housing and health: From interdisciplinary principles to the transdisciplinary research and practice. Futures, 4, 488-489.
Manokhina, N. V. (2015). The transdisciplinary approaches in modern science. Vectors of change of economic policy, Vestnik of International Institute of Economics and Law, 1(10), 431-436.
Melnikov, V. (2007). Quantum Economics. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University, 364 p.
Moiseev, V. I. (2009). Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Philosophy, 411 p.
Moki, М. (2010). History and philosophy of Economic Science. Moscow: Publishing house Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 325 p.
Morgenstern, O. & Neumann, F. (1947). Theory оf games and economic behavior. Princeton, Princeton University, 478 p.
Neumann, F. (1959) Contributions to the theory of games. Annals of Mathematics Studies, 4, 13-42.
Piaget, J. (2001). Theory, experiment, discussion. Moscow: Publishing house Akademika, 264 p.
Remadier, T. (2004). The transdisciplinarity and its challenges: The case of urban studies. Futures, 36, 433-434.
Stepanova, Т. E. (2012). Regularities of Economics, based on knowledge. Samara: LLC «Publishing house As Gard», 374 p.
Моki, V. (2014). The transdisciplinarity in Higher Education: expert estimation, problems and practical solutions. Modern problems of Science and Education, 5, 3-15.