(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 6635-6650 | Article Number: ijese.2016.498
Published Online: September 11, 2016
Abstract
Development of academic mobility of students from different countries requires evaluating the influence of their cultural traits on the behavior on the educational products market. The subject of present study is the development of methodic approach towards evaluating the cross-cultural traits influence on students’ behavior on the higher education products market. Within the study we developed a model of culture, which reflects the list of cultural values and characteristics of material and institutional values adapted for the educational products market of the universities. We propose a method of constructing a matrix of cross-cultural analysis of the elements, which create the model of culture in the consumers from a certain culture and behavioral traits of students on the higher education market. The developed methodical approach was evaluated on Chinese and Russian students. The results of the study can be used for developing measures for increasing the attractiveness of Russian universities for Chinese consumers.
Keywords: cross-culture, model of culture, students’ behavior, educational products market
References
Agarwal, J., Malhotra, N., Bolton, R. (2010). A Cross-National and Cross-Cultural Approach to Global Market Segmentation: An Application Using Consumers' Perceived Service Quality. Journal of International Marketing, 18(3), pp. 18-40.
Aghion, P., Dewatripoint, M., Hoxby, C.M., Mas-Colell, A., Sapir, A. (2010). The governance and performance of research universities: Evidence from Europe and the USA. Economic Policy, 25(61), pp. 7–59.
Aleshina, I.V. (2011). Marketing: kross-kulturnye problem i vozmozhnosti. [Marketing: cross-cultural problems and opportunities]. Sovremennyy menedzhment: problem, gipotezy, issledovaniya. (Ed. M.Yu. Shereshev). M.: NIU VSHE.
Almakaeva, A.M. (2014). Izmerenie generalizovannogo (obobschennogo) doveriya v kross-culturnykh issledovaniyakh. [Evaluating generalized trust in cross-cultural studies]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 11, pp. 32-43.
Buela-Casal, G., Gutiérrez-Martínez, O., Bermúdez-Sánchez, M., Vadillo-Muñoz, O. (2007). Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities. Scientometrics, 71 (3), pp. 349–365
Cheung, F.M., Van de Vijver, F.J.R., Leong F.T.L. (2011). Toward a new approach to the assessment of personality in culture. American Psychologist, 66 (7), pp. 593– 603.
Dill, D.D., Soo, M. (2005). Academic quality, league tables and public policy: A cross-national analysis of university ranking systems. Higher Education, 49, pp. 495–533.
Fedorov, P.M. (2015). O sravnimosti rezultatov kross-kulturnykh issledovaniy (na primere izmereniya ustanovok v otnoshenii migrantov). [On compatibility of cross-cultural studies (on the example of evaluationg attitudes towards migrants)]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 1, pp. 73-78.
Filinov, N.B., Ruchkina S. (2002). The ranking of higher education institutions in Russia: some methodological problems. Higher Education in Europe, 27, pp. 407–421.
Gelade, G.A. (2008). IQ, cultural values, and the technological achievement of nations. Intelligence, 36(6), pp. 711–718.
Gesteland, R. (2012). Cross Cultural Business Behavior: Negotiating, Selling, Sourcing And Managing Across Cultures. Copenhagen Business School Press.
Harrison, L.E. (2006). The Central Liberal Truth: How Politics Can Change a Culture and Save It from Itself. Oxford University Press.
Hofstede, G.J., Pedersen, P.B., Hofstede, G. (2002). Exploring Culture: Exercises, Stories and Synthetic Cultures. Yarmouth, Maine: Intercultural Press.
Karacharovskiy, V.V., Shkaratan, O.I., Yastrebov, G.A. (2014). Kultura i modernizatsiya v zerkale vzaimodeystviya rossiyskikh i inostrannykh professionalov v multinatsionalnykh trudovykh kollektivakh v Rossii. [Culture and modernization in light of interactions between Russian and foreign professionals in multinational working teams in Russia]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, 8, pp. 67-77.
Lebedeva, N.M., Tatarko, A.N. (2007). Tsennosti kultury i razvitie obschestva. [Cultural values and development of the society]. Moscow: HSE Publishing House
Li, M., Shankar, S., Tang, K.K. (2011). Why does the USA dominate university league tables? Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), pp. 923-937
Liu, N.C., Cheng, Y. (2005). The academic ranking of world universities. Higher Education in Europe, 30, pp. 127–136.
Mohrman, K. (2013). Are Chinese universities globally competitive? China Quarterly, 215, pp. 727-734.
Mok, K.H. (2014) Enhancing quality of higher education for world-class status: Approaches, strategies, and challenges for Hong Kong. Chinese Education and Society, 47(1), pp. 44-64.
Moven, J. (1995). Consumer Behavior. 4-th ed. Macmillan Publishing Co.
Solomon, М. (2012). Consumer Behavior. Prentice Hall of India.
Yanitskiy, M.S., Braun, O.A. (2015). Etnokulturnaya spetsifika tsennostnoy ierarkhii pedagogov kak agentov sotsializatsii. [Ethnic-cultural specifics of axiological hierarchy in teachers as agents of socialization]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3(63), pp. 262-267.