(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 6573-6580 | Article Number: ijese.2016.492
Published Online: September 10, 2016
Abstract
This paper covers on contingent legal capability of a conceived child. To protect the capability of conceived children and legal rights, including property, emerging on that basis, it is imperative to strictly identify the moment of emergence and termination of legal capability. The objective of this research is to analyze the provisions on civil law governance of the relations, the object of which is a conceived child’s legal capability, and to develop recommendations aimed at improvement of the international regulations. General scientific methods are mainly applied in the course of theoretical rationalizing of the problem, studying the issues of establishment and development of the concept on contingent legal capability of a conceived child in regulations of various countries. It is offered to formalize in the legislation contingent recognition of an embryo as a person, and in that case a mandatory provision should apply – further birth of an alive child which brings an embryo from the category of contingent person into the category of non-contingent person, enjoying a number of rights prior to the birth – the right to be an heir, a grantee, a fructuary. Capability classification was offered – contingent capability of a conceived child; partial capability of a born child; full capability of an adult. The absence of medical indications predetermines absolute protection of a conceived child as a special object of protection. It is required to identify the list of reasons to be accepted by all the states as sufficient for legal termination of pregnancy – first, to take care about life and health of mother, also allowing improving the demographic situation in some countries
Keywords: capacity, capability, natural person, minor, realization of right
References
Svevo-Cianci, K.A., Herczog, M., Krappmann, L., & Cook, F. (2011). The New UN CRC General Comment 13: “The Right of the Child to Freedom from All Forms of Violence” – Changing How the World Conceptualizes Child Protection. Child Abuse & Neglect, 35(12), 979-989.
Kilborn, S. (1990). Placing the Convention on the Rights of the Child in an American Context. Human Rights: Journal of the Section of Individual Rights and Responsibilities, 26(2), 28.
Manciaux, M. (1998). Children's Rights: Their Development in the Light of the Protection and Promotion of Child, Family, and Community Health. International Digest of Health Legislation, 49(1), 12-17.
Goldson, B., & Muncie, J. (2015). Juvenile Justice: International Law and Children's Rights. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 956-962).
Alberth, L., & Bühler-Niederberger, D. (2015). Invisible Children? Professional Bricolage in Child Protection. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 149-158.
Hackett, S. (2015). Child Protection: International Issues. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 423-429).
Bywaters, P., Brady, G., Sparks, T., Bos, E., Bunting, L., Daniel, B., Featherstone, B., Morris, K., & Scourfield, J. (2015). Exploring Inequities in Child Welfare and Child Protection Services: Explaining the ‘Inverse Intervention Law’. Children and Youth Services Review, 57, 98-105.
Léveillé, S., & Chamberland, C. (2010). Toward a General Model for Child Welfare and Protection Services: A Meta-Evaluation of International Experiences Regarding the Adoption of the Framework for the Assessment of Children in Need and Their Families (FACNF). Children and Youth Services Review, 32(7), 929-944.
Melton, G.B. (2013). Programs Aren’t Enough: Child Protection Must Become a Part of Everyday Life. Child Abuse & Neglect, 37, Supplement, 1-7.
Parton, N. (2006). Every Child Matters: The Shift to Prevention whilst Strengthening Protection in Children's Services in England. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(8), 976-992.
Orlando, F., & Seals, M. (2005). Children. Legal Protection and Rights of Children. In Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine (pp. 338-343).
Borská, J., Vacková, J., & Small, M.A. (2016). United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and Its Implementation in the 21st Century. Kontakt, 18(2), e96-e102.
Aiken, W., & Purdyb, L.M. (2012). Children’s Rights. In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics (2nd ed.) (pp. 417-422).
Peak, K., & Del Papa, F.S. (1993). Criminal Justice Enters the Womb: Enforcing the “Right” to Be Born Drug-Free. Journal of Criminal Justice, 21(3), 245-263.
Mykitiuk, R., & Lee, R. (2015). Reproductive Rights in Affluent Nations. In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) (pp. 468-476).
Iyioha, I.O., & Nwabueze, R.N. (Eds). (2015). Comparative Health Law and Policy: Critical Perspectives on Nigerian and Global Health Law (pp. 246-248). Basingstoke, GB: Ashgate.
Clements, L., & Read, J. (Eds.). (2008). Disabled People and the Right to Life: The Protection and Violation of Disabled People’s Most Basic Human Rights (pp. 79-82). London: Routledge.
American Convention on Human Rights. (1969, November 22). Retrieved July 28, 2016, from https://www.referent.ru/1/12652.
Steinbock, B. (1996). Life before Birth (the Moral and Legal Status of Embryos and Fetuses) (pp. 291-296). New York: Oxford University Press.
Ennertserus, L. (1949). Kurs germanskogo grazhdanskogo prava. T. 1, polutom 1 [Germanic Civil Law Course (Vol. 1, Semi-Vol. 1)] (pp. 285-286). Moscow.
Woman Loses Frozen Embryos Fight. (2006, March 7). BBC News. Retrieved July 28, 2016, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/4779876.stm.