(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 6226-6237 | Article Number: ijese.2016.459
Published Online: August 27, 2016
Abstract
The paper considers the issue of functioning of the mechanism of formation and translation of values of labor in family. Fundamental labor values and main channels of their distribution are revealed based on empiric material. Family influence on motivation of today’s Russian youth’s labor behavior was determined. An intergenerational comparative analysis of labor mindset and values of parent’s generation and their children was carried out. Random sampling was used for designing “parent” sampling: parents of students of two state universities of Nizhny Novgorod, Minin University and Dobrolyubov University, were interviewed. Survey type – hands-on: students were supposed to interview parents with respect to their labor mindset. Respondent parents were asked a question on values they consider important for their children. It was proposed to choose at most three from 7 options: prestigious work, high income, self-fulfillment opportunities, interesting work, socially useful labor, family well-being, health. Family well-being turned out to be the most significant for respondents. 79,5% of respondents chose this answer. Health ranks second – 76,2%. 36,9% of respondents distinguished the role of interesting work. High income ranks fourth (36,1%), 32,0% and 25,4% of parents wish their children self-fulfillment opportunities and prestigious work, correspondingly. Socially useful labor appeared least important among suggested options, only 3,3% of respondents checked it. The percentage of parents, who highlighted their own influence on children’s occupational choice and support of that choice, is high. The research also demonstrated that today’s students are much less involved in household work than parents at their age.
Keywords: Family; youth’s labor mindset; sociocultural mechanisms of intergenerational values translation
References
Blau, J.R. (1993). Social Contracts and Economic Markets. New York: New York Life, 220 p.
Durkheim, E. (1897). The Prohibition of Incest and its Origins, L'Année Sociologique, 1, 1-70
Gorshkov, M.K. (2007). New Russia’s youth: life style and value priorities. Moscow: Higher School, 268 p.
Gurko, T.A., Orlova, N.A. (2011). The development of teenager's personality in different family types. Russian Sociology in Turbulent Times. Moscow: Russian Society of Sociologists, 869-876.
Korzh, N.D. (2009). Labor mindset in the value system of student youth. Penza: Higher School, 325 p.
Kutepova, L.I., Mukhina, M.V., Smirnova, Z.V. (2014). Role of practice in competent specialist training. Minin University Herald, 10(1), 7-12.
Kutepova, L.I., Smirnova, Z.V., Konyshev, E.V. (2015). Housing and public utilities specialists training improvement in the system of professional education. Minin University Herald, 3(11), 11.
Lapin, N.I. (1990-2006). Our values today. Moscow: Higher School.
Nemova, O.A. (2013). Labour mentality of today’s student youth: qualitative social studies experience. European Social Science Journal, 8 (35), 500-508.
Nemova, O.A., Pakina, T.A. (2010). Issues of youth socialization under conditions of social and economic uncertainty. The State University of Management Herald, 12(8), 31-32.
Pakina, T.A. (2014). Labour values and preferences of today’s students based on social studies. Moscow University Herald, 18(1), 1-15.
Pakina, T.A. (2014). Labour values of today’s student youth. Nizhny Novgorod State University Herald, 11(2), 34-35.
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, Ill. : Free Press, 600 p.
Pokida, A.N., Zybunovskaya, N.V. (2016). Dynamics of the historical memory in the Russian society. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration: Moscow, 356 p.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press, 438 p.
Schwartz, S.H. (1987). Towards a Psychological Structure of Human Values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1(10), 22-25.
Sorokina, N.D. (1994-2002). Researches focused on studying students’ self-determination. Moscow: Higher School.
Svadbina, T.V., Nemova, O.A., Pakina, T.A. (2014). Modern traffic: causes, kinds, consequences, preventative measures. Sociological research, 2(1), 43-48.
Weber, M. (1930).The Protestant ethnic and spirit of capitalism. London: Allen and Unwin, 247 p.
Zhuravleva, N.A. (2006). Personality’s value orientations dynamics in the Russian society. Moscow: Nauka, 310 p.