(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 6147-6161 | Article Number: ijese.2016.451
Published Online: August 27, 2016
Abstract
The urgency of the problem stated in the article is caused by the fact that modern scientific studies show that sustainable neuro-associative connections with the object of addiction arise at chemical addiction. The aim of this study is to examine the features of the reciprocal organization of constructive activities in drug addiction. Study of the constructive activity of patients with drug addiction in comparison with the group in norm was carried out by using the experimental method. The study found a decrease of constructive activity in drug addiction by the characteristics of performance pace and accuracy, regulated by reciprocal and auditory-motor coordination, which, in turn, are also significantly reduced. Reciprocal organization in drug addiction is characterized by impaired proprioceptive kinesthetic afferentation of motor act at safety of outer space organization of movements, lack of differentiation and low handling of movements, movement program disorders, as well as the replacement of the right movements by motor patterns and stereotypes. The obtained results are experimental psychological argument for the need to introduce neuropsychological block in the system of psychotherapeutic impact, which includes the tasks aimed at increasing reciprocal organizations to improve the general level of constructive activity in order to create alternative to the stereotyped models of mental activity and patterns of behavior.
Keywords: Constructive activity, reciprocal organization, reciprocal coordination, profile of lateral brain organization
References
Akhmetzyanova, A. I. (2015). Anticipation and Prediction of Interrelation of Neuropsychological Mechanisms in Young Age. The Social Sciences, 10, 399-401.
Anokhina, I. P. (2013). Main biological mechanisms of alcohol and drug addiction. Moscow: National Scientific Center of Addiction of the Ministry of Health of Russian Federation, 13 p.
Anokhina, I. P., Veretinskaya, A. G., Vasileva, G. N. & Ovchinnikov, I. V. (2000). About the unity of biological mechanisms of individual predisposition to substance abuse. Man’s physiology, 26, 74-81.
Beck, D.M., Rees, G., Frith, C.D. & Lavie, N. (2001). Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness. Nature Neuroscience, 4(6), 645-656.
Frit, K. (2016). Brain and soul: How nervous activity shapes our inner world. Moskow: Astrel: CORPUS, 335 p.
Karter, R. (2015). How does the brain works. Moskow: Astrel: CORPUS, 224 p.
Morozova, E.V., Shmeleva, S.V., Sorokoumova, E.A., Nikishina, V.B. & Abdalina, L.V. (2015). Acceptance of Disability: Determinants of Overcoming Social Frustration. Global journal of health science, 7(3), 317-323.
Nikishina, V. B., Petrash, E. A. & Kuznetsova, A. A. (2015). Approbation of methods of event reconstruction of personality time perspective. Psychology questions, 2, 140-147.
Nikishina, V. V. & Zapesockaya, I. V. (2010). Mechanisms of addiction state transformation. University Herald. University, 17, 83-87.
Uhtomski, A.A. (2002). Dominance. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 448 p.
Vasserman, L.I., Dorofeeva, S.A. & Meerson, Y.A. (1997). Methods of neuropsychological diagnostics. Saint Petersburg: Stroylespechat, 360 p.