(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 5993-6001 | Article Number: ijese..001
Published Online: August 25, 2016
Abstract
The urgency of the problem, which is developed in the article enclosed in an emerged reducing tendency, and sometimes a complete rejection of importance of the humanities knowledge at the current stage of scientific development. The article shows that in the context of the overestimation the role of natural and technical education by modern society, it is clearly underestimated importance of humanities education. Paper is aimed at creating prerequisites for the study of contemporary place in science of humanities and culture in general. As the leading methodological approaches of this study the author uses the cultural approach and the principle of determinism. The article substantiates the proposition that without an understanding of human nature and the sake of what a man lives on the earth, the solution of all other problems and technical quests are meaningless. In other words, the humanity stands as a mainstay of human in culture. As a result of the systematization and generalization of facts, the author offers a new universal metasubjected approach in cognition of the social reality that allows evaluating the possibilities and prospects of the global human survival. Because of the article’s methodological nature, it is aimed at the creation of a theoretical basis for future researches of the humanities in general and for those whose scientific work is not indifferent to the fate of the humanities.
Keywords: Human, technical, humanitarian, culture
References
Eagleton T. (2015). The slow death of the university. Direct access: http://scepsis.net/library/print/id_3672.html.
Gurevich, P. S. (2014). The greatness and the inestimable value of human knowledge. Humanitarian knowledge and challenges. St. Petersburg: University Book, 132 p.
Hegel,G. W. (1974). Science of Logic. Moscow: Mysl, 452 p.
Hesse, S. I. (1995). Basics of pedagogy. Introduction to Applied Philosophy. Moscow: Shcola-Press, 448 p.
Ignatova, V. A. (2001). Pedagogical aspects of synergy. Pedagogy, 8, 26-31.
Mamardashvili, M. K. (1992). Law dissent. Here and Now, 1, 10-14.
Shapovalov, V. F. (1994) On the specifics of human knowledge. Direct access: http://ecsocman.hse.ru/data/169/741/1217/009Viktor_ShAPOVALOV.pdf.
Sola, J. (2013). The fundamental error of “modern” civilization. Signs. Direct access: http://www.f7x.ru/blog/%D0%BA%D0%BB%D1%8E%D1%91%D1%82/1876?page=2.
Solzhenitsyn, A. I. (2013). In the First Circle. Moscow: Publishing House "AST", 768 p.
Stalin, I. V. (1951). Essay. The issue of industrial and technical intelligentsia of the working class. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature, 87p.
The First Russian Congress in Cultural Research. Programme. (2006). Report Summaries. – St. Petersburg: Eidos. – 432 p.
The Second Russian Congress in Cultural Research. Programme. (2008). Report Summaries. – St. Petersburg: Eidos, 560 p.