The paper deals with the problem of foreigners’ rights and freedoms protection during the criminal procedure in The Republic of Kazakhstan. The comparative analysis of national and international legal framework shows that principles of legal defend of foreigners’ interests do not have a practical application. Examining the content of requests on legal assistance received by the General Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Kazakhstan in 2012-2015 the authors determine that about 20% of the orders relate to the admission of representatives of the competent authorities of foreign states. The study also proposes the amendments to the determination of rights and duties of a representative of a foreign state. The practical value is that the research can be a theoretical basis for further development of effective legislative mechanisms of the foreign citizens’ interests’ protection in Post-soviet countries and other states referring to the Romano-Germanic legal system.

Act on International Cooperation in Criminal Matters of 23 December 1982 (Federal Law Gazette I page 2071). (2012). as last amended by Article 1 of the Act of 21 July 2012, Bundesgesetzblatt, I 2012, 15661, http://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/englisch_irg/englisch_irg.html.

Agreement between the Government of the Republic of Lithuania and the Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan on legal assistance and legal relations in civil, family and criminal cases signed in Vilnius on August 9, (1994).

Akparova, R.N. (2006). International cooperation of the Republic of Kazakhstan on legal assistance in criminal matters. Current practice and perspectives. (200 p.). Karaganda: OtiPRINT.

Assanova, M.A. (2015). Public Policy and Model of Sustainable Development in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Asian Social Science, 11(6), 237.

Bajmahanov, T.M., & Bajmahanova, D.M. (2009). The growing role of international legal regulation – a feature of the current state of human rights. Journal of Russian Law, 11, 78-87.

Barrios, S., Görg, H., & Strobl, E. (2005). Foreign direct investment, competition and industrial development in the host country. European Economic Review, 49(7), 1761-1784.

Carayannis, E., & Grigoroudis, E. (2014). Linking innovation, productivity, and competitiveness: implications for policy and practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 199-218.

Cole, D. (2002). Are Foreign Nationals Entitled to the Same Constitutional Rights as Citizens. Thomas Jefferson Law Review, 25, 367.

Consular statute of the Republic of Kazakhstan was ratified by the Presidential Decree of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (1999). September 27, N 217.

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, adopted at the 2202 plenary meeting in New York. (1973). December 14.

Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2014: A Practical Guide. - Almaty: “Norma-Ks”. - 368 p.

Cryer, R., Friman, H., Robinson, D., & Wilmshurst, E. (2014). An introduction to international criminal law and procedure. Britain: Cambridge University Press.

Dolzer, R. (1987). Diplomatic protection of foreign nationals. Encyclopedia of Public International Law, 10, 121-4.

Drobjazkina, I. (2015) International civil process. (390 p.). Saint Petersburg: Litres.

European Convention on Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. (1959). Strasbourg, April 20.

Fan, M.D. (2014). The Law of Immigration and Crime. The Oxford Handbook of Ethnicity, Crime And Immigration. New York: New York Press.

Feoktistova, E. E. (2010). International cooperation of the pretrial investigation agencies in criminal matters. (281 p.). Monograph. All-Russian Research Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs.

Khusainova, R.M., Shilova, Z.V., & Curteva, O.V. (2016). Selection of Appropriate Statistical Methods for Research Results Processing. Mathematics Education, 11(1), 303-315.

Lezhe, R. (2011). Great modern legal frameworks: a comparatively-legal approach. (pp. 43-57). Russia: Wolters Kluwer.

Nazarbaev, N. (1994). A Strategy for the Development of Kazakhstan as a Sovereign State. Embassy of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

Ronning, C.N. (2012). Diplomatic asylum: legal norms and political reality in Latin American relations. Springer Science & Business Media.

Sluiter, G., Friman, H., Linton, S., Vasiliev, S., & Zappalà, S. (Eds.). (2013). International criminal procedure: principles and rules. (p. 1800). OUP Oxford University press.

Svensson, M. (2013). Norms in law and society: towards a definition of the socio-legal concept of norms. Social and Legal Norms. London: Ashgate.

Swire, P., & Hemmings, J. (2015). Stakeholders in Reform of the Global System for Mutual Legal Assistance. Georgia Tech Scheller College of Business Research Paper, (32).

Tarr, D.G. (2015). The Eurasian Economic Union among Russia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic: Can it succeed where its predecessor failed? Belarus, Kazakhstan, Armenia and the Kyrgyz Republic. Can it succeed where its predecessor failed?, 33 p.

The Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan (approved by referendum on 30 August.) (1995). http://www.constitution.kz/

Treaty between the Republic of Kazakhstan and the Islamic Republic of Pakistan for mutual legal assistance in civil, family and criminal cases from August 23, (1995).

Urinboyev, R., & Svensson, M. (2013). Corruption in a culture of money: Understanding social norms in post-Soviet Uzbekistan. (pp. 267-284). Social and Legal Norms. Aldershot: Ashgate.

Ustinov, A.V. (2014). The interaction of the pretrial investigation agencies of the Russian Federation with the authorized agents of foreign countries for obtaining evidences in criminal proceedings. (pp. 34-49). Moscow.: Jurlitinform.

Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Vienna, 24.04.1963

Volevodz, A.G. (2014). Conceptual problems of improving the regulation of criminal procedural aspects of international cooperation in the draft of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure. Lawyer, (1), 69-74.

Werle, G., & Jessberger, F. (2014). Principles of international criminal law. (720 p.). OUP Oxford University press.