(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 5653-5661 | Article Number: ijese.2016.417
Published Online: August 13, 2016
Abstract
Carbon footprint is an environmental menace that needs to be addressed at once. Various mitigating measures were proposed and yet manifestations of its proliferation are very much observable. This study seeks to determine primarily the barriers of non-adherence to identified measures to mitigate carbon footprint in the environment. Using the mixed method, 612 respondents from the academe were recruited to participate in the study, using the proportionate stratified random sampling, lottery method. The results show high adherence to measures to mitigate carbon footprint (M=3.60/5, SD=.80). Moreover, results show that to an extent, there are barriers for those in the academe to adhere completely to mitigating measures and even to adopt an advocacy that advances the ideology of saving the earth from suffocation because of carbon footprints. In the order of importance, they are social barriers (M=2.98, SD=.99), political barriers (M=2.91, SD=.96), and psychological-cognitive barriers (M=2.87, SD=1.05). Moreover, those in the academe believe that they cannot completely adhere to measures to mitigate carbon footprint because of reasons such as lack of knowledge about these measures and even the concept itself; Filipino concept about laws and legalities; and the lack of enforcement of relevant laws.
Keywords: Carbon footprint, measures, adherence, climate change, global warming
References
Amadore, L., Perez, R.., Feir, R., 2008. Climate change impacts and responses in the Philippines coastal sector. Climate Research Journal, 12: 97-107.
Bishop M., 2008. Home to reduce Carbon Footprint. Crabtree Publishing Company. Canada.
BP (2007), What is a Carbon Footprint?, Retrieved October 20, 2012, from www.bp.com/liveassets/bp_internet/globalbp/STAGING/global_assets/downloadsA/ABP_ ADV_what_on_earth_is_a_carb on_footprint.pdf.
ETAP, 2007.The Carbon trust helps UK businesses reduce their environmental impact, Press Release. Retrieved February 08, 2012 from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/etap/ pdfs/ jan07_carbon_trust_initiative.pdf.
Grubb and Ellis, 2007.Meeting the Carbon challenge: The role of commercial real estate owners. Users & Managers, Chicago.
Hunt, G., 2007. Global warming and the future of healthcare and nursing. Royal College of Nurses Annual Congress. abs-cbnnews
Maslin, M., 2004. Global warming. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nocum, A. D (2012).RP 7th among 233 nations most affected by climate change; Kris declares war on illegal loggers!. Retrieved November 8, 2012, from http://www.krislibrary.com/ 1/post/2012/08/rp-7th-among-233-nations-most-affected-by-climate-change-kris-declares-war-on-illegal-loggers.html
Sabater, M. (2008, May 20). The Philippines: Climate hotspot. Manila Bulletin.
World Health Organization. (2005) Climate and health: Fact sheet. Geneva.
Wiedmann, T. and Minx, J. (2008).A definition of 'Carbon Footprint'. In: C. C. Pertsova, Ecological Economics Research Trends: Chapter 1, pp. 1-11, Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge NY, USA. Retrieved November 08, 2012, from https://www.novapublishers. com/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=5999
Www.carbonfootprint.com on February 8, 2012
Www.climate.nasa.gov on March 11, 2012
Www.paperrep.com on January 7, 2012
Www.unicef-irc.org on December 08, 2011