An action research study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of providing metacognitive support to enhance Year 9 students’ metacognitive capabilities in order to better understand science concepts related to light, environmental health, ecosystems, genetics, ecology, atoms and the Periodic Table. The study was conducted over three years involving 35, 20 and 24 students in each year. The interventions included providing students with clearly stated focused outcomes about the relevant science concepts, engaging in collaborative group work, reading scientific texts and using concept mapping techniques. The data to evaluate the effectiveness of the metacognitive interventions were obtained from pre- and posttest results of the Metacognitive Support Questionnaire (MSpQ). The results showed gains in the MSpQ.

Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition Learning 4(1), 87-95.

Barret, T. (2011). Breakthroughs in action research through poetry. Educational

Action Research, 19(1), 5-21.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Cohen, L., Manoin, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th. ed.). London: Routledge.

Coolican, H. (2009). Research methods and statistics in psychology. London, UK: Hodder Education.

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Collecting qualitative data. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddler River, NJ: Pearson.

Greene, J. A., Costa, L-J., & Dellinger, K. (2011). Analysis of self-regulated learning processing using statistical models for count data. Metacognition & Learning, 6, 275-301.

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graser, A. C. (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.

Hartman, H. J. (2001). Metacognition in learning and instruction: theory, research and practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Hofer, B. K., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Epistemology, metacognition and self- regulation: Musings from an emerging field. Metacognition and Learning,

5(1), 113-120.

Jacobse, A. E., & Harskamp, E. G. (2012). Towards efficient measurement of metacognition in mathematical problem solving. Metacognition and Learning, 7(2), 133-149.

Larkin, S. (2006). Collaborative group work and individual development of metacognition in the early years. Research in Science Education, 36, 7-27

Leutwyler, B. (2009). Metacognitive learning strategies: Differential development patterns in high school. Metacognition Learning, 4, 111-123.

McLoughlin, C., & Taji, A. (2005). Teaching in the sciences: Learner-centred approaches. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.

Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544-555.

Pintrich, P. R., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 43-97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.

 Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

Thomas, G. P. (2003). Conceptualisation, development and validation of an instrument for investigating the metacognitive orientation of science classroom learning environments: the metacognitive orientation learning environment scale-science (MOLES-S). Learning Environments Research, 6, 175-197.

Thomas, G. P. (2006). An investigation of the metacognitive orientation of Confucian-heritage culture and non-Confucian-heritage culture science classroom learning environments in Hong Kong. Research in Science Education, 36, 85-109.

Veenman, M. V.  J. (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: A discussion. Metacognition Learning, 6, 205-211.

Veenman, M.V.J., & Spaans, M.A. (2005). Relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills: Age and task differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 15(2), 159-176.

Williamson, K. (2002). Research Methods for Students and Professionals: Information Management and Systems. Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia: Centre for Information Studies, Charles Sturt University.

Wilson, N. S., & Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings of metacognition. Metacognition Learning, 5, 269-288.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Zohar, A., & David, A. B. (2009). Paving a clear path in a thick forest: A conceptual analysis of a metacognitive component. Metacognition Learning, 4, 177-195.