(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 5237-5249 | Article Number: ijese.2016.388
Published Online: August 11, 2016
Abstract
The study deals with a comprehensive analysis of constitutional fundamentals of state administration of the social sphere in the Republic of Kazakhstan. The content of the constitutional law social sphere institution is unfolded by means of the inter-sectoral analysis of legal regulations of which it consists and the inter-disciplinary study of the elements of its structure. The essence and the content of state administration of the social sphere in the contemporary environment of the Republic of Kazakhstan is presented in correlation with related areas of administration. The authors studied the organization of public authorities in the social sphere and examined the specifics of activities of appropriate public authorities. A special attention was paid to the issues of efficient realization of the administrative and legal and social reforms in this area of social relations. The practical value is that the submissions can be useful for the improvement of the provisions of the effective legislation of the Republic of Kazakhstan and of practices of applying the law in the context of the process of the progressive formation of the Republic of Kazakhstan as a social welfare state
Keywords: The Republic of Kazakhstan (RK), constitutional regulation mechanisms, social sphere administration, social reforms, social welfare state
References
Axinn, J., & Stern, M. J. (2011). Social Welfare: A History of the American Response to Need. New York: Pearson Higher, 438 p.
Baldwin, P. (1990). The Politics of Social Solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 368 p.
Box, R. C. (2004). Chapter 4. Critical Theory & The Paradox of Discourse. New York: M.E. Sharpe, 352 p.
Calhoun, C. (1996). Social Theory and the Public Sphere. Canada: Wiley, 192 p.
Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (1995). Dated August 30. Kazakhstan Pravda, 82, 132.
Dahrendorf, R. (2011). The Modern Social Conflict: the Politics of Liberty. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 219 p.
Erhard, L. (1992). Deutsche Wirtschaftspolitik: Der Weg der Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Frankfurt: Econ, 864 p.
Estevez-Abe, M., Iversen, T. & Soskice, D. (2001). Social Protection and the Formation of Skills. Oxford: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage, 145 p.
Gilbert, N., & Terrell, P. (2013). Dimensions of Social Welfare Policy. New York: Pearson Higher, 312 p.
Gunther Teubner Societal Constitutionalism (2003). Alternatives to State-centred Constitutional Theory Storrs Lectures. Direct access: http://www.jura.uni-frankfurt.de/42852793/societal-_constitutionalism.pdf
Hacker, J. S. (2002). The Divided Welfare State: The Battle Over Public and Private Social Benefits in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 466 p.
Huber, E., Ragin, C. & Stephens, J. D. (1993). Social democracy, Christian democracy, constitutional structure, and the welfare state. American Journal of Sociology, 5, 711-749.
Khamzin, A. S. & Khamzina, Z. A. (2015). International Legal Maintenance of Guarantee Mechanisms for Social and Labor Rights. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 2(22), 65-74.
Khamzina, Z. A. & Buribayev, Y. A. (2015a). Evaluation of the Reform Efficiency in Public Social Sector Management of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 43-55.
Khamzina, Z. A. & Buribayev, Y. A. (2015b). Problems of Overcoming Poverty in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 3-5.
Khamzina, Z. A., Buribayev, Y. A. & Oryntayev Z. K. (2015). Problems of Social Support for Large Families. ISJ Theoretical & Applied Science, 3(23), 109-114.
Lampert, H. L. (1993). The Economic and Social Order of the Federal Republic of Germany. London: Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, 188 p.
Mironova, T. K. (2007). Correlation of the Notions “Social Protection” and “Social Welfare” in ILO Conventions and Recommendations. Law: Theory and Practice, 7(96), 37-42
Pascall, G. & Manning, N. (2000). Gender and Social Policy: Comparing Welfare States in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Journal of European Social Policy, 10(3), 240-266.
Pierson, P. (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press on Demand, 254 p.
Raadschelders, J. C. (2008). Understanding Government. Four Intellectual Traditions in the Study of Public Administration, Public Administration, 86(4), 925-949
Rosanvallon, P. (2015). La Nouvelle Question Sociale. California: Seuil, 228 p.
Shaipova, G. R. (2013). Correlation of the Constitutional Law Category “Social Protection” and “Social Welfare”. Publishing House of P. A. Stolypin Povolzhye Management Institute, 6, 149-151
Spicer, M. W. (2005). Public Administration Enquiry and Social Science in the Postmodern Condition. Some Implications of Value Pluralism, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27(4), 669-688
Steiner, U. (2010). Social Welfare State without Social Rights. Comparative Constitutional Review, 4(77), 118-129
Stillman II, R. J. (2010). Concepts & Cases. International edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 544 p.
Tanchev, E. (2014). The Social (Welfare) State in Modern Constitutionalism. The Law and the State, 3(64), 36-41.