(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 5034-5048 | Article Number: ijese.2016.373
Published Online: August 10, 2016
Abstract
In this article the authors reveal the basic cultural mechanisms that influence the formation of the tolerance strategy in Kazakh and Kazakhstan society, show its basic directions, as well as its importance for the modern Kazakhstan society and the formation of intercultural communication with foreign countries. Tolerance is a necessary element of intercultural communication; is the ability to understand the important thing not only in own, but in a different culture, to see value starts in the other, alien faith, to isolate the grounds that do not contradict the spiritual and moral values. The purpose of this article is to study cultural and philosophical place and role of the tolerance strategy in Kazakh culture, analyze the cultural mechanisms of Kazakh culture, which not only form the tolerance in Kazakh culture, but also implement it in society. The main methods used in this research are the structural-functional, institutional, and phenomenological approaches. The phenomenon of “tolerance” is defined as a human quality that is an integrative characteristic with a cognitive, emotional-evaluative, and behavioural component. The latter determines the active moral stance in interaction with people, regardless of their cultural or social setting, ethnic origin, religion, education, age, occupation or opinion.
Keywords: Tolerance strategy, youth society, tolerance development program, multicultural environment, interethnic relations
References
Abaev, N. V. (1983). Chan Buddhism in the culture of mental activity in medieval China. Novosibirsk: Nauka.
Abdikerova, G. O. (2011). The roles and functions of social institutions in the modernization of Kazakhstan society. Post-Soviet model of social transformation: the experience of the twentieth. Proceedings of the international scientific-theoretical conference (pp. 19-21). Karaganda: KSU.
Asmolov, A. G. (2000). On the way to tolerance. Moscow: Meaning.
Asmolov, A., Soldatova, G. & Shaygerova, L. (2001). About the meaning of the concept “tolerance". The Century of tolerance, 1-2, 8-19.
Aydin, H. (2013). Educational reform in Nigeria: the case of Multicultural Education for Peace, Love, and Tolerance. South African Journal of Education, 33(1), 1-19.
Garadzha, V. I. (2005). Sociology of Religion. Moscow: INFRA-M.
Gumilev, L. N. (1967). The term "ethnicity". Report. department and the Commission. GO, No 3 1967 Ethnicity as a phenomenon. - Report. department and the Commission. GO, No 3, 1967.
Guseynov, A. A. (2012). Morality as Limits of Rational. Voprosy filosofii, 5, 4-17.
Ismagambetova, Z. N., Karabaeva, A. G. & Gabitov, T. H. (2014). Tolerance as a social and cultural phenomenon. Almaty: Kazakh University.
Kadyrzhanov, R. (2013). Ethnic stability and national unity in Kazakhstan. National unity of Kazakhstan. The collection of materials of the round table. Almaty: IFPRI KH MES RK.
Kant, I. (2013). Introduction to the Metaphysics of Morals. Start Publishing LLC.
Karabaeva, A. G. & Ismagambetova, Z. N. (2012). Social aspects of tolerance and some educational strategies in society. Modernization of Kazakhstan's education in contemporary sociological discourse. The 1st Azhenovsk’s reading. International Scientific Conference (pp. 25-32). Almaty.
Matskovsky, M. S. (2004). Tolerance as an object of sociological research. In G. U. Soldatova, T. Y. Prokofevoy, T. L. Lyutoy (Eds.) Intercultural Dialogue: Research and Practice (p. 143-145). Moscow: Center for Media MSU. University.
Mendus, S. (1999). My brother’s keeper: The politics of intolerance. In S. Mendus, The Politics of Toleration, 1, 1-12.
Murphy, B. C. & Dillon, C. (2014). Interviewing in action in a multicultural world. Nelson Education.
Nazarbayev, N. A. (2008). The policy of peace and harmony. Astana: Elorda.
Nysanbaev, A. N. (2004). Globalization and problems of intercultural dialogue, Vol. 4. Almaty.
Reardon, B. E. (2001). Tolerance - the road to peace. Moscow: Bonefes.
Takaki, R. (1993). A Different Mirror: A History of Multicultural America. New York: Back Bay Books
Telebayev, G. T. (2003). Religious identification of the population and the religious situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Sociological researches, 3, 101-105.
UNESCO. (1995). Declaration of Principles on Tolerance. Adopted by the General Conference of Unesco at its twenty eight session. Paris.
Weber, M. (2015). On the methodology of the social sciences. Lulu Press, Inc.
Williams, Cf. B. (1999). Tolerating the intolerable. In S. Mendus (ed.), The Politics of Toleration: Tolerance and Intolerance in Modern Life (pp. 65–75). (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1999); and more generally many of the contributions in D. Heyd (ed.), Toleration: An Elusive Virtue (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996).