The article contains a comparative analysis of foreign arbitration courts’ decisions, ensuring the reciprocity and public policy. The aim of the study is to explore such aspects as reciprocity and public policy of arbitration courts. The result is the view of the public policy, despite its apparent irrelevance in today's Kazakhstan, which is of fundamental importance in the examination of cases in Western countries. The article also carries the example of the court's decisions in Kazakhstan and the UK, their reciprocity and public policy. In other words, the execution of Kazakhstan arbitral decisions in another country is a necessary condition and basis for the execution of arbitral decisions of other countries in Kazakhstan. The article also examines the confession and carrying into execution of arbitral courts’ decisions. In addition, it was revealed that the arbitration court is a non-state court. It is elected by the parties of the dispute, or by those, to whom the parties have entrusted this choice. The novelty of the research is the comparative analytical overview based on foreign arbitration courts.

Bantekas, I. (2002). Some Aspects of Execution of Foreign Arbitral Decisions in the United Kingdom: Financial For a Public Policy and Jus Cogens. Bloomsbury: Bloomsbury Publishing, 320 p.

Bantekas, I. (2008). The Private Dimension of the International Customary Nature of Commercial Arbitration. 25 Journal of International Arbitration, 4, 449–460.

Civil Code No. 269-XII. (1994). General Part, as amended up to Law of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 162 of March 2, 2001.

Convention on the Recognition and Execution of Foreign Arbitral Decisions. (1958). New York Convention Guide, 77 p.

Decision of the constitutional Council of the RK. (2000). On the official interpretation of paragraph 3 of rule 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 18(2), 66-69.

Illegal transactions (1999). The effect of Contracts and Torts. UK Law Commission Consultation Paper, 43-44.

Lemenda trading Co. ltd. v. African Middle East petroleum ltd., (1988), QB 448.

Report of Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery. (1999). UN Commission on Human Rights. Geneva, 115 p.

The agreement on the procedure of mutual execution of decisions of arbitration and economical courts in territories of the member states of the Commonwealth. Moscow, March 6, 1998.

The Convention on the recognition and execution of foreign arbitral decisions. (1958). New York Convention Guide, XII, 87-91.

The Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Natural or Legal Persons of Other States. (1962). International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. Washington, D.C., 128 p.

The law of the Republic of Kazakhstan “On international commercial arbitration” № 23-III LRK of December 28, (2004). Astana. Akorda, 65 p.

The law of the Republic of Kazakhstan "On arbitration courts" № 22-III LRK of December 28, (2004). Astana. Akorda, 94 p.

Treaty on the Settlement of Disputes Related to Economic Activity. (1992). Treaty Ratified by the Decree of the Verkhovna Rada No. 2889-XII. Kiev, 43 p.