Model of Formation for Readiness to Work within Inclusive Education in Teachers

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Movkebayeva, Oralkanova, Mazhinov, Beisenova & Belenko, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Movkebayeva, Z.A., Oralkanova, I.A., Mazhinov, B.M., Beisenova, A.B. & Belenko, O.G. (2016). Model of Formation for Readiness to Work within Inclusive Education in Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), 4680-4689.

Harvard
In-text: (Movkebayeva, Oralkanova, Mazhinov, Beisenova and Belenko, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Movkebayeva, Z., Oralkanova, I., Mazhinov, B., Beisenova, A. and Belenko, O. (2016). Model of Formation for Readiness to Work within Inclusive Education in Teachers. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(11), pp. 4680-4689.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Movkebayeva, Oralkanova, Mazhinov, Beisenova and Belenko 2016)
Your Bibliography: Movkebayeva, Zulfiya A., Indira A. Oralkanova, Bagdat M. Mazhinov, Aitolkyn B. Beisenova and Oksana G. Belenko (2016). "Model of Formation for Readiness to Work within Inclusive Education in Teachers". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (11):4680-4689.

Abstract

The whole civilized world commonly practices including of all the children into educational system regardless on their abilities or cultural and social status. In this context there is a topical issue of creation of a social environment within an educational institution that shall allow a child to fulfil him/herself, to feel inner connection with the world around, to realise his/her importance for the world. The objective of this research is to model the process of formation of readiness in teachers of elementary school to work within inclusive education. The article describes basic parameters of professional and physiologic readiness of elementary school teachers to inclusion of a child with special educational needs into educational process: new conception thinking, ability to realise personal and social value of work with children with special educational needs, readiness to continuous learning and self-development. In order to create effective ways of training teachers to work within inclusive education the methods of theoretical analysis and synthesis were used. The results of the study might be used in preparation of teachers to work in inclusive schools is a complex and systematic work, including professional selection of applicants to the pedagogical specialty and the inclusion of psychological and pedagogical disciplines with information about inclusive education.

Keywords: Inclusive education, physiologic readiness, elementary school teacher, formation of readiness in teachers, model.

References

Alyokhina, S.V. (2012). Readiness of the teacher for realization of inclusive approach in education. Science and Education. Munich, Germany: Publishing Office Vela Verlag, 656 p.

Bim-Bad, B.M. (1998). Pedagogical anthropology. Moscow: Publishing house URAO, 576 p.

Bodalev, A.A. (1995). Personality and communication. Moscow: International Pedagogic Academy, 328 p.

Bondarevskaya, E.B. (1997). Humanistic paradigm of person-centered education. Pedagogics Journal, 4, 11-17.

Cagran, B., Schmidt, M. (2011). Attitudes of Slovene teachers towards the inclusion of pupils with different types of special needs in primary school. Educational Studies, 37(2), 171-195.

Derkach, A.A. (2004). Acmeology. Moscow: RAGS, 298 p.

Forlin, C., Chambers, D. (2011). Teacher preparation for inclusive education: Increasing knowledge but raising concerns. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 17-32.

Galkienė, A. (2003). Pedagoginė sąveika integruoto ugdymo sąlygomis. Šiauliai: Šiaulių Universitetas, 169 p.

Galperin, P.Ya. (1999). Introduction to psychology. Moscow: Knizhnuy dom “Universitet”, 332 p.

Gazman, O.S. (1995). New values of education: content of humanistic education. Moscow: ILI RAO, 103 p.

Ivanov, D. (2007). Competences and competency building approach in modern education. Moscow: Science, 195 p.

Kertaeva, K.M. (2002). Pedagogical ethics teaching. Moscow: Science, 224 p.

Kolesnikova, I.A. (2007). Basic principles of andragogy. Moscow: ACADEMA, 169 p.

Leontiev, A.N. (1977). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Moscow: Politizdat, 304 p.

Likhachov, B.T. (1997). Introduction to the theory of educational values. Samara: SIU, 84 p.

Maslow, A.H. (1970). Motivation and personality. New-York: Harper & Row, 369 p.

Nikandrov, N.D. (2004). Values in life and education. Higher Education Today, 11, 34-40.

Rubinstein, S.L. (1997). Philosophic and psychological selectas. Moscow: Science, 463 p.

Shchedrovitskiy, G.P. (1996). Philosophy. Science. Methodology. Moscow: Science, 641 p.

Shchurkova, N.E. (1998). Up-bringing: new outlook from the point of view of culture. Moscow: Pedagogical Search, 177 p.

Shumilovskaya, Yu.V. (2011). Preparation of a future teacher to work with pupils within inclusive education. PhD Thesis. Shuya: Shuya State Pedagogical University, 174 p.

Slastenin, V.A. (2000). Axiological basis of education. Value priorities of basic and professional education: Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (pp. 27-30). Moscow, Russian Federation.

Vygotsky, L.S. (1982). Issues in the theory and history of psychology. Moscow: Pedagogics, 488 p.

Zimnyaya, I.A. (2004). Competency building approach in education. Issues on the quality of education: Proceedings of the 14th National Conference (p. 13-27). Moscow, Russian Federation.

Zmeev, S.I. (2007). Andragogy: basic principles, theories, stories and methods of education of adults. Moscow: PER SE, 272 p.