The article deals with a set of economic, social and psychological factors that result in decrease of birth-rate and render the market incentives in overcoming depopulation of Russia inefficient. Doubts about the appropriateness of Western models, which are being continuously and ineffectively adapted to Russian reality by researchers from Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States, call for attempts at finding solution within the framework of social constructivism. Analytical sessions and a sociological research into circumstances and considerations, which are perceived as those impeding the realization of the reproductive potential of Russian women, helped to lay down the conceptual statements on the formation of new strategies aimed at inclusion of reproductive labor in the process of social production. Ascertained were the specific social-psychological and medical factors that influence reproductive processes and can bring about considerable demographic changes.

Alexander, P., Baden, S. (2000). Glossary on macroeconomics from a gender perspective. Brighton: Institute of development of studies. Bridge (development-gender). 48, 2-40. http://www1.aucegypt.edu/src/macroeconomics/PDFS/gender%20and%20macroeconomics.pdf

Antonov, A. (1995). Depopulation and the family crisis in post-Soviet Russia: who is to blame and what to do? Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 18. Sociology and political science, 2, 12-21.

Baranov, A. (2000). Socio-economic problems of depopulation and the aging of the population. Questions of economy, 7, 111–120.

Baranov, A. (2000). Some factors of population crisis. Sociological studies, 7, 116–119.

Becker, G. (1991). Treatise on the Family. Harvard: University Press, 424 p.

Berger, P., Luckman, T. (1995). Social Construction of Reality. Moscow: Medium publ., 323 p.

Bezrukova, O. (2011). Reproductive motivate women. Sociological studies, 12, 122 –124.

Borisov, V. (1995). Marriages and births in Russia: demographic analysis. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, 67 p.

Elson, D. (1997). Integrating Gender Issues into Public Expenditure: Six Tools. USA: University of Manchester, Graduate School of Social Sciences, GENECON Unit.

Folbre, N. (1994). Who Pays for the Kids? Gender and the Structures of Constraint. London, New York: Routledge, 335 p.

Kapitsa, S. (1999). The general theory of human population growth. Moscow: Nauka, 216 p.

Kulagina, G. (2002). National accounting. Moscow: Finansy i statistika, 607 p.

Mehra, R., Gammage, S. (2005). Trends, Countertrends, and Gaps in Women's Employment. World Development, 3, 533–550.

Nyberg, A. (1998). Women, men and incomes. Gender equality and economic independence. Stockolm: Fritze, 87 p.

Palmer, I. (1991). Social and Gender Issues in Macroeconomic Policy Advice. Social Policy Series, 13, 45-62.

Popper, K. (1992). The Open Society and Its Enemies. Moscow: Fenix Publ., 528 p.

The social construction of gender. (1991). Ed. by J. Lorber and S. A.  Farrell. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage Publications, 374 p.

What do Russians think about low birth-rate. Public Opinion Fund review. (2002). Demoscope Weekly, 53-54. http://demoscope.ru/weekly/2002/053/analit02.php

Zbarskaya, I. (1999). Family crisis and depopulation in Russia. Sociological studies, 11, 51-56.

Zhurzhenko, T. (1999). The discourse of the market and the issue of gender in the economy, Social studies and the present, 5, 175 – 187.