(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 4617-4630 | Article Number: ijese.2016.337
Published Online: August 06, 2016
Abstract
The present study comprehensively analyzes vowel harmony as an important phonetic rule in Turkic languages. Recent changes in the vowel harmony potential of Turkic sounds caused by linguistic and extra-linguistic factors were described. Vowels in the Kazakh, Turkish, and Uzbek language were compared. The way this or that phoneme sounded in the Proto-Turkic language and the way it sounds now in each specific language was investigated. The common and distinguishing features of phonemes were specified based on concrete facts. The specificity of sounding of key vowel phonemes was analyzed with regard to the findings of prominent phoneticians. It was found that of the compared languages, only the Turkish and the Kazakh language preserved the classic eight Proto-Turkic vowels. Certain signs of vowel harmony were characterized – tree types of vowel opposition: by backness – front, back, central, by labialization – unlablialized-labialized, by roundness – narrow, wide, and medium. Thus, it is possible to see the full picture of the phonemic spectrum of vowel functioning in the Turkic languages under consideration by distinguishing the common trends in changes at the current stage of linguistics with regard to the specificity of each individual language system.
Keywords: Vowel harmony, sound harmony, phonetic regularity, labialized-unlabialized vowel, palatal sound
References
Abuov, Zh. O. (1978). On the Influence of the Phonological System on the Perception of Phonetic Signs of Vowels: PhD Abstract. Leningrad, 27 p.
Baydar, T. İ. (2013). Yardımcı Fiil Şeklinde Oluşan Birleşik Fiiller Üzerine. A.Ü. Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, 5, 55–66.
Caferoğlu, A. (2013). Türk Dili Tarihi. İstanbul: Enderun Kitabevi, 246 p.
Dzhunisbekov, A. (1991). The Structure of the Kazakh Language. Alma-Ata: Gylym, 115 p.
Dzhusupov, M. (1991). Sound Systems in the Russian and Kazakh Languages. Tashkent: FAN, 214 p.
Iskhakov, F. G. (1955). Long Vowels in Turkic Language. Study of the Comparative Grammar in Turkic Languages. Moscow: Eastern Literature Publishing House, 264 p.
Kononov, A. N. (1976). Essay on the history of study of the Turkish language. Leningrad: Nauka, 115 p.
Korkmaz, Z. (2013). Türkiye Türkçesinin Temeli Oğuz Türkçesinin Gelişimi. Ankara: TDK Yayınları, 230 p.
Odanova, S. A. (2014). Economy in the Kazakh Language: Law or Phenomenon? Science Journal, 11(4), 242-253.
Reshetov, V. V. (1961). Basic Phonetics, Morphology, and Syntax of the Uzbek Language. Tashkent: Secondary and High School of the Uzbek SSR Publishing House, 232 p.
Sevortyan, E. V. (1955). Phonetics of the Turkish Literary Language. Moscow: AV USSR Publishing House, 134 p.
Serebrennikov, B. A. (1986). Comparative and Historical Grammar of Turkic languages. Moscow: Nauka, 294 p.
Shcherbak, A. M. (1970). Comparative Phonetics of Turkic Languages. Leningrad: Nauka, 76 p.
Tekin, T. (1978). Determination of Middle-Turkic Long Vowels Through Arud. Ankara: Kurmay Kitap Yayın Dağıtım, 704 p
Torsuyev, G. P. (1962). Issues of the Verbal Phonetic Structure. Leningrad: AV USSR Publishing House, 312 p.
Wurzel, W. (1983). Phonologie. Kleine Enzyklopädie. Leipzig: Deutsche Sprache, 14, 567–582.