The subject of the article is of current interest nowadays in the conditions of spiritual and moral crisis provoked by the deep social and economic transformations occurring in modern society. Such public situation makes fall into a muse about the revival of lost cultural wealth, about moral and patriotic reference points in youth education. The aim of the study is identifying and studying the basics of pedagogical system for the formation of civil activity in students during the learning process. That is necessary not only to improve the quality of education and the educational process, but also for the democratization of life in general. The study identifies the main functions of a pedagogical management, specific pedagogical impact, and define special test or questionnaire probable degree of susceptibility or resistance to the student's ideas of others. Historical and pedagogical methods allowed to determine that the problem of formation of civil activity was and is the subject of attention of philosophers, educators and other scientists. Significant results gave a comparative analysis of specific trends in the formation of civic engagement of young people in Europe and Russia. The practical significance of the study lies in developing of a model of the system for the formation of students civil activity; defining stages and conditions of the complex implementation of the process; substantiation of criteria and indicators of youth civic activity.

Aksenov, G.P. (1990). Personality as the most precious value. Moscow: Knowledge, 164 p.

Amanoshvili, Sh. (1990). Personal-humane basis of the pedagogical process. Minsk: University press, 559 p.

Bespalko, V.P. (1989). Pedagogical technology and means of teaching. Moscow: Education, 66 p.

Bratton, M., Alderfer, P., Browser, G., Temba, J. (1999). The Effects of Civic Education on Political Culture: Evidence from Zambia. World Development. 27, 807-824.

Campbell, D.E. (2006). What is education’s impact on civic and social engagement? Measuring the effects of education on health and civic engagement: Proceedings of the Copenhagen symposium (pp. 25-126). Paris, France: OECD.

Finkel, S.E. (2002). Civic Education and the Mobilization of Political Participation in Developing Democracies. Journal of Politics. 64, 994-1020.

Galston, W.A. (2001). Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 217-234.

Hall, P. (1999). Social Capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science. 29(3), 417-462.

Khakimov, N.Kh., Larin, S.N. (1989). Students’ Independent work. Tashkent: Teacher, 111 p.

Kharimov, I.A. (1995). High-qualified specialists are progress intensive. Tashkent: SHARQ-Press, 32p.

Kharimov, I.A. (1997). Uzbekistan on the Threshold on XXI century: threats, condition and guarantee progress. Tashkent: Fun, 315 p.

Khazarov, L.V. (1998). Social and philosophical foundations, trends and prospects of development of modern education. Tomsk: TPU Press, 294 p.

Law of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Education”. (1997). Tashkent: Shark, 20-30.

Matyushkin, A.M. (1982). Psychological structure, dynamics and the development of cognitive activity. Issues of Psychology, 4, 5-17.

McAdam, D., Paulsen, R. (1993). Specifying the Relationship between Social Ties and Activism. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 640-67.

Medeuov, E.W, Dostiyarov A.M, Mamykova, G.J. (2000). Motivation as a leading factor regulation of activity of the person. Almaty: Altynsarin, 182 p.

Mokeyeva, E.V., Andreeva I.N. (2016). Civic and Patriotic Education of Pre-School Children. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(9), 2224-2236.

Morduchowicz, R., Catterberg, E., Niemi, R.G., Bell, F. (1996). Teaching Political Information and Democratic Values in a New Democracy: An Argentine Experiment. Comparative Politics, 28, 465-476.

Nash, M. (2005). How to Be Thankful for Being Free: Searching for a Convergence of Discourses on Teaching Patriotism, Citizenship, and United States History. Teachers College Record, 107, 214-240.

Nie, N.J., Junn, J., Stehlik-Barry, K. (1996). Education and democratic citizenship in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 140 p.

Rean, A.A, Bordovskaya, N.V, Rozum, S.I. (2001). Psychology and pedagogy. Moscow: Science, 541 p.

Rogov, E.I. (1998). Psychology of cognition. Moscow: VLADOS, 176 p.

Slomczynski, K.M., Shabad, G. (1998). Can Support for Democracy and the Market Be Learned in School? A Natural Experiment in Post-Communist Poland. Political Psychology, 19, 749-779.

Smirnova, L.N. (1997). The phenomenon of spirituality: social-philosophic aspects of analysis. Moscow: Science, 151 p.

The Constitution of the Republic of Uzbekistan. (2003). Tashkent: Shark, 36 p.

Villegas-Reimers, E. (1994). Civic Education in the School Systems of Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: Academy for Educational Development, 147 p.

Yan-Wing, L., Yuen, T.W.-W. (2009). School Civic Education Since 1980s: A Brief Review of the Literature in Hong Kong. Educational Research Journal, 24(2), 257-291.