(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 3937-3946 | Article Number: ijese.2016.304
Published Online: August 04, 2016
Abstract
The article deals with consideration of the actual theoretic problems of the subject and system of tax law in Russia. The theoretical approaches to determination of the nature of separate institutes of tax law are represented. The existence of pandect system intax law building as financial law sub-branch of Russia is substantiated. The goal of the article is to review tax law in Russia and to evaluate tax law condition in a legislative system. Base methods which is used during the work are: dialectical method, also that’re methods of historic, comparative legal and system analysis, formal logical, axiological and also literary review of the native and the abroad scientists. In a result we see that tax law is a sub-brunch of financial law. As a perspective we can distinguish procedural tax law as a complex part of tax law in tax law system. The article may be used as a theoretical base for following development of tax law.
Keywords: Subject and system of tax law, tax laws in the legal system, tax law institutes, tax law sub-institutes
References
Azmi, D. M. (2009). The legal value and correlation of the notions “process” and “procedure”. Advocate, 12, 13-20.
Berman, D. M. & Haneman, V. J. (2014). Making Tax Law. Durham: Carolina Academic Press, 325 p.
Demin, A. V. (2010a). Procedural norms of the tax law: notion and specificity. Taxes and taxation, 11, 66-70.
Demin, A. V. (2010b). Tax process and tax procedures: the searches of compromise. Taxes, 3, 6-9.
Ehrke-Rabel, T. (2014). Das schlaue Lernsystem Lehrbuch. Elements Steuerrecht, 6, 14-25.
Fujii, M. (2016). The Japanese tax system. London: Routledge, 91 p.
Harris, P. (2013). Corporate tax law: Structure, policy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 256p.
Heinrich, J. (2013). Österreichisches Steuerrecht. Uppsala: Verlag Osterreich, 363 p.
Hogg, P., Magee, J. & Li, J. (2013). Principles of Canadian Income Tax Law. Toronto: Carswell, 233 p.
Hudiakov, A. & Brodskiy, G. (2002). The theory of taxation. Almaty: Kazakh University, 364 p.
Kashanina, T. & Kashanin, A. (2009). The Russian law. Moscow: Norma, 422 p.
Kerimov, D. (2000). Legislative technique. Moscow: Norma, 366 p.
Krokhina, Y. (2012). Tax law. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 286 p.
Krokhina, Yu. (2004). Tax law. Moscow: Norma, 342 p.
Kucheriavenko, N. (2009). Tax law course. Kharkov: Statut, 77 p.
Kucherov, I. (2012). Legal signs of money obligations and their difference from money obligations. Financial law, 1, 12 – 18.
Pahlsson, R. (2001). Inledning till skatteratten. Andra upplagan. Uppsala: Iustus Forlag, 216 p.
Parygin, V. & Tedeev, A. (2011). Tax law. Voronezh: MODEK, 266 p.
Qiu, D. (2014). Interpretation of Tax Law in China: Moving Towards the Rule of Law? Hong Kong Law Journal, 2, 34-46.
Rembar, C. (2015). The law of the land: The evolution of our legal system. New-York: Open Road Media, 363 p.
Romashov, R. (2005). The Theory of State and Law. St. Petersburg: Piter, 352 p.
Shaviro, D. (2014). The Economics of Tax Law. Oxford: Oxford Handbook of Law and Economics, 353 p.
Staroverova, O. & Eriashvili, N. (2004). Rule and law. Moscow: Unity-Dana, 333 p.
Tavis, A. (2015). Tax and Social Justice: Perspectives of a Brunswick Public Service Fellow. Tax Law, 68, 455.
Unger, P. & Vock, M. (2015). Casebook Steuerrecht. Uppsala: Verlag Osterreich, 175 p.
Vinnitskiy, D. (2015). Russian tax law. St. Petersburg: Juridichesky Center–Press, 472 p.