Veterinary Safety’s Conflicts in the EAEU

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Kalymbek, Shulanbekova & Mirambaeva, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Kalymbek, B., Shulanbekova, G.K. & Mirambaeva, A.S.M.a.G.Z. (2016). Veterinary Safety’s Conflicts in the EAEU. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), 3915-3924.

Harvard
In-text: (Kalymbek, Shulanbekova and Mirambaeva, 2016)
Your Bibliography: Kalymbek, B., Shulanbekova, G. and Mirambaeva, A. (2016). Veterinary Safety’s Conflicts in the EAEU. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(10), pp. 3915-3924.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Kalymbek, Shulanbekova and Mirambaeva 2016)
Your Bibliography: Kalymbek, Bakytzhan, Gulmira K. Shulanbekova and Ainur S. Madiyarova and Gulnaz Zh. Mirambaeva (2016). "Veterinary Safety’s Conflicts in the EAEU". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 11 (10):3915-3924.

Abstract

This article is devoted to the problem of veterinary safety of the countries under the Eurasian Economic Union. Animal health’s measures are provided in order to prevent the entry and spread of infectious animal diseases, including common to humans and animals, as well as goods not conforming to the common veterinary and sanitary requirements. Ensuring compliance with veterinary and sanitary measures rests on the shoulders of each member state, as well as their authorized agencies. The aim of the study is the veterinary conflicts’ review, which reveals the real face of veterinary safety in EAEU. The result of the study is estimation how the post-soviet countries’ (which are interested in EAEU) laws are ready to provide veterinary safety to their EAEU-partners. The research’s novelty is in psychological and economic discourse of the veterinary conflict’s nature in EAEU.

Keywords: Veterinary conflicts, veterinary safety, Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU), post-soviet countries, sanitary safety

References

Africa N. (2015). Russia and Eurasia. Strategic Survey, 115(1), 112-118.

Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures of WTO, adopted in April, 15, 1994. (2007). The Legal Texts. The Results of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral Trade Negotiations, 13, 59-72.

Ayanbayev, Y. S., Sairambayeva, Z. T. & Aidarbayev, S. Z. (2015). Sanitary and Veterinary Regulations of Pesticides Use: Unternational Law and Its Significance for the Republic of Kazakhstan. Asian Social Science, 11(19), 31-35.

Black, R. & Kireeva, I. (2014). “Sanitary and veterinary hygiene requirements for imports of fish and fishery products into Russia — the tensions between regional integration and globalization. ERA Forum, 15(4), 495-518.

Constitution of the Republic of Kazakhstan (1995). Direct access: http://www.constitution.-kz/english/

Delcour, L. & Wolczuk, K. (2015). The EU’s Unexpected ‘Ideal Neighbour’? The Perplexing Case of Armenia’s Europeanisation. Journal of European Integration, 37(4), 491-507.

Dergousoff, D. (2015). Perceptions about implications of the Eurasian Economic Union on food security in Kyrgyzstan. Direct access: https://www.academia.edu/20566676/Perceptions_-about_Implications_of_the_Eurasian_Economic_Union_on_Food_Security_in_Kyrgyzstan.

Dumitru, A. (2015). Whither development? The effects of the Eurasian Union on the Central Asian Republics. Romanian Journal of Society & Politics 10(2), 94-118.