(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 3690-3699 | Article Number: ijese.2016.284
Published Online: August 03, 2016
Abstract
In the development of spiritual and cultural heritage, the Kazakh renaissance, which began with the implementation of the "Cultural heritage" national project, has exposed the problems of self-identity, uniqueness, national and global relations. One reason is misunderstanding of nomadism as a kind of "anti-civilization", an embodiment of the destruction and ignorance forces. The aim of the article is to analyze the development of the Kazakh philosophy and its communication with the global philosophical knowledge. In the article, the Kazakh philosophy is regarded as a spiritual quintessence of nomadic culture with its characteristic type of ontology and anthropology. The whole problem of tolerance is built around the phenomenon of understanding and acceptance, the achievement of which requires personal dialogue. The Kazakh philosophy, by reconstructing the rich philosophical heritage of the Kazakh people, due to the free world philosophical hermeneutics heritage, determined the new opportunities and future directions of research. These include the philosophy of mutual understanding, the modern Turkic philosophy, planetary ethics, Islam phenomenology, Nomadic epistemology, the philosophy of Tengrianism, the Neofarabi studies, Kazakhstani Eurasianism. The findings showed that the active development of the global and national cultural and philosophical heritage is an essential tool for the growth of national consciousness; it creates the prerequisites for the rise of a new form of philosophy, which connects the global and national philosophical experience.
Keywords: Kazakh philosophy, cultural heritage, national self-identity, personal dialogue, integration of philosophy
References
Abazov, R. (2007). Culture and customs of the Central Asian republics. Greenwood: Greenwood Publishing Group, 253 p.
Alimzhanova, A. S. (2015). Kazakhstan: The Choice of Civilizational Priorities. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 153-160.
Ashwin, S. (2000). Gender, state, and society in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia. Moscow: Psychology Press, 352 p.
Azmukhanova, A. (2013). Aspects of intercultural dialogue in the post-Soviet time. Service in Russia and abroad, 2, 132-140.
Gu, M. L. (2011). Chinese culture and modernization. Available at SSRN 1924109, 23-41.
Heidegger, M. (2014). Introduction to metaphysics. Yale: University Press, 163 p.
Huffman, J. L. (2013). Modern Japan: an encyclopedia of history, culture, and nationalism. London: Routledge. 362 p.
Karipbayev, B. I., Razumov, V. I., & Soloshchenko, P. P. (2016). Traditions and perspectives of the socio-humanistic discourse in the Central Kazakhstan: International Training Conference, dedicated to the 20th anniversary of the faculty of Philosophy and Psychology at E. A. Buketov Karagandy State University. Omsk University "Vestnik", 1(79), 24-35.
Kerimbayev, N., & Akramova A. (2015). Kazakh History and Philosophy: the Ethnomathematical Component of the Content of Primary School Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Ppreprint archive: 1503.05418.
Kerimbayev, N., & Akramova, A. (2015). Kazakh History and Philosophy: the Ethnomathematical Component of the Content of Primary School Education in the Republic of Kazakhstan. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1503.05418.
Nicoll, L. (2004). Philosophy, Tradition, Nation. Scotland in Theory: Reflections on Culture & Literature, 1, 211-215.
Pieper, J. (2009). Leisure: The basis of culture; The philosophical act. California: Ignatius Press, 274 p.
Puzikova, S. M. (2015). Systems of Values of the Young People: Comparative Analysis of a Re¬se¬arch in China and Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 138-142.
Sadykov, K. A. (2014). The Young Independent State Philosophy Problem. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141, 791-794.
Sartre, J. P. (2015). Sketch for a Theory of the Emotions. London: Routledge, 253 p.
Suleimenov, Т. А. (2015). Development of philosophy in the post-Soviet Kazakhstan (methodological aspect). Eurasian Union of Scientists, 7(16), 41-49.
Tapper, R. (2013). Tsars, Cossacks, and Nomads: The Formation of a Borderland Culture in Northern Kazakhstan in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. International Journal of Turkish Studies, 19(2), 63-72.
Tolen, Z. (2013). The Culture of Interethnic Concord in Kazakhstan: Peculiarities of Formation and Development. Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 75, 152-163.
Wear, R. D. (1990). Nomads Versus Cultivators: a Cultural Analysis of the Western World Unknown Binding. London: ESP, 214 p.
Yeshpanova, D. D. & Kurmangaliyeva, G. K. (2014). Kazakhstan and Central Asia: the Turkic cultural heritage in the integration processes. Kazakhstan: Editor in Chief, 352 p.
Yessenbekova, U. M. (2016). Promotion of National Traditions by Kazakhstan Mass Media as a Mean of Ideological Influence. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(9), 35-42.
Zatov, K. A. & Kantarbayeva, Z. (2015). Cultural traditions and innovations in modern Kazakhstan society. Kazakhstan National University "Vestnik" on Politology, Philosophy and Culturology, 1(50), 36-47.