(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 3562-3574 | Article Number: ijese.2016.273
Published Online: August 02, 2016
Abstract
Research objective is to theoretically justify and to develop pedagogical system of development of future teachers’ professional thinking culture. In the research there are used a set of theoretical methods: systematic analysis of the philosophical, psychological and pedagogical literature on the researched topic; compilation and classification of pedagogical publications; analysis of educational-methodical documentation; projection of systems and processes. As a result developed pedagogical system of development of future teachers’ professional thinking culture is the interaction of such components as purposeful, informative, activity, control-evaluative, effective. The culture of teacher’s professional thinking is a complex system formation and purposeful creation of the culture of professional thinking can only be the result of specially organized pedagogical process on the organization of mental activity, adequate to these features. At the same time we have developed pedagogical system that promotes the pedagogical system of development of future teachers’ professional thinking culture.
Keywords: Teacher’s professional, thinking culture, pedagogical system, stages of formation, professional education
References
Cooper, R. K. & Sawaf, A. (1994). Executive EQ Emotional Intelligence in leadership and Organization. New York: Perigee Book, 358 p.
Ilusisova, S. M. & Kambarkisi, A. (2005). А. Features of social thinking in the pedagogical conflict. Bulletin KazNU, 2(15), 32-37.
Imig, S, Parker M., Roseboro D. L. & Smith, R. (2012). The evolution of teacher candidates' thinking: coming to consciousness and developing conscience. Teaching and Learning, 26(2), 58-69.
Kovalchuk, L. (2014). Modeling of cultural and educational environment as a pedagogical condition of forming of professional thinking culture of future teachers. European Scientific Journal, 10(22), 69-81.
Law on Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2007). Kazakhstan truth. Almaty, 75 p.
Li-fang, Zh. (2004). Thinking styles: University Students' Preferred Teaching Styles and Their Conceptions of Effective Teachers. Journal of Psychology, 138(3), 233-252.
Morgan, A. M. (2012). Subject-specific literacies and transition in the middle years: examples of teacher thinking, research and practice. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 20(3), 39-51.
Perkins, D. Creating a Culture of Thinking. Educational Leadership. EBSCO. 2002; 98-99.
Rasumova, O.V. (2008). Future teachers’ subject and specific thinking formation: PhD Abstract. Kazan, KSU, 82 p.
Sadykov, T. S., Hmel, N. D., Zhampeisova, K. K.. (2000). Concept of pedagogical education of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Almaty: LEM. 15 p.
Salamatina, A. M. (2005). Junior students’ Technical Thinking Formation: PhD Abstract. Almaty: KazNPU, 25 p.
Saroj, V. (2006). Sex difference in thinking style of teachers trainees. IJPE, 37(2), 127-136.
Sarsekeyeva, Zh. Ye. (2011). Teacher’s professional thinking culture. Karaganda: KarSU publishing, 354 p.
Saxena, S., Jain, S. & Jain, R. (2013). Influence of forms of thinking styles on emotional intelligence of teacher educators. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(5), 30-33.
Sherlock, J. & Vesely, P. (2005). Pedagogical tools to develop critical thinking. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 9(4), 155-167.
The State Obligatory Standard of Education of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2010). The higher professional education. Bachelor degree. Specialty 5B010200 – Pedagogics and a technique of elementary education, 31 p.
Toomela, A. (2007). Culture of science: strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 6-18.