(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 3532-3547 | Article Number: ijese.2016.271
Published Online: August 02, 2016
Abstract
The purpose of the study is to analyze the features of monitoring the educational process during students’ practical training at schools. We examined a number of methods and techniques of conducting monitoring of educational process as embodied by future teachers’ practical training at secondary schools: continuous observation, method of test situations, explication, surveys, analysis of results of learners’ educational activity and testing of students (n=500). The monitoring of educational process during school-based practical training is considered from two perspectives: from the university-staff perspective and from the perspective of developing students’ skills of implementing such monitoring. The submissions can be useful for perfecting the content of education, evaluating the effectiveness of educational technologies being measured and identification of problems in the educational process as well as ways to resolve them
Keywords: Managing educational process, educational monitoring, educational standards, pedagogical practical training, diagnostics of a schoolchild’s personal development
References
Borisenko, I. & Volodina, D. (2015). Educational Smart Technologies in the Educational Process. Journal of Siberian Federal University: Humanities and Social Sciences, 8(3), 489-493.
Buldygina, L. (2007). Implementation of monitoring as a means of managing the professional development of pedagogues. Informatics and Education, 4, 103-108.
Cawelti, G. (2000). Handbook of Research on Improving Student Achievement. Alexandria: Educational Research Service, 263 p.
Coates, H. (2010). Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1-17.
Gorb, V. (2003). Technological aspects of pedagogical monitoring of interrelations of the subjects of educational activity at university. Standards and monitoring in education, 2, 46-52.
Isaev, A., Isaeva, L. & Kravets, A. (2013). Individualized Educational Trajectory: Educational Courses Integration. World Applied Sciences Journal, 24, 62-67.
Kara, A. & Skornichenko, N. (2012). Monitoring Of The Basic Educational Programs Mastering Quality In The System Of The University Innovative Activity. European Journal of Business and Economics, 7, 45-52.
Kovalenko, I. (2012). Pedagogical monitoring as a means of managing the quality of education. Newsletter of Tula State University. The Humanities, 1(2), 262-271.
Kozhanova, M. (2016). Features of Pedagogical Management of Students Civil and Patriotic Qualities Forming. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(2S), 20-31.
Lenske, G. (2016). The importance of pedagogical knowledge for classroom management and for students' achievement. Zeitschrift Fur Erziehungswissenschaft, 19(1), 211-233.
Levina, E. (2016). Efficiency Management of Educational Systems Development: Approaches and Criteria. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(2), 12-23.
Lovett, T., Clarke, C. & Kilmurray, A. (1983) Adult education and community action. Hampshire: Croom Helm, 363 p.
Mayorov, A. (2005). Monitoring in education. Moscow: Intellect Centre, 264 p.
Nikolaenko, V., Grakhova, E. & Rakhimov, T. (2016). Improving the Efficiency of the Educational Process Using Interactive Teaching Methods. Retrieved from: http://festival.1september-.ru/articles/521876/
Scheerens, J. (2003). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, 325 p.
Shatalov, A. (2008). Monitoring and diagnostics of the quality of education. Moscow: Social Projects Institute, 175 p.
Shilibekova, A. S. (2011). Pedagogical monitoring in the system of general secondary education. The Gazette of Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abai, Pedagogical sciences series, 4 (32), 91-95.
Spector, J. M. & Yuen, A. H. (2016). Educational Technology Program and Project Evaluation. London: Routledge, 264 p.
Tazhbayeva, S., Assilkhanova, M. & Ilimkhanova, L. (2014). Conceptualizing for Educational Work Organization in Institutions of Higher Education: Mission, Goals, and Pedagogical Strategies for Reforming Higher Education in Kazakhstan. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 27-38.
Turgunbayeva, B. & Tikhomirova, V. (2006). Pedagogical monitoring in the system of intensive further training of teachers. Almaty: Kazakh Universiteti, 114 p.
Van Den Bogaart, A. C. (2016). A computer-supported method to reveal and assess Personal Professional Theories in vocational education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 1, 1-17.
Vlasova, V. K. & Kirilova, G. I. (2012). Algorithms of monitoring and control of educational process in the context of electronic educational resources. Quality Innovations Education, 7, 36-40.
Willms, J. D. (2003). Monitoring school performance. London: Routledge, 163 p.
Yelistratova, I. V. (2015). Pedagogical monitoring in the system of assessing the quality of educational process at a teacher’s level. Direct access: http://festival.1september.-ru/articles/521876/
Yepaneshnikov, V. V. (2016). Pedagogical management of civil education of research universities students. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(2), 12-18.
Zeer, E. F. (2005). Psychology of profession. New-York: Foundation World, 352 p.