(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 3013-3024 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.732a | Article Number: ijese.2016.233
Published Online: June 26, 2016
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine science teachers’ level of using computers in teaching and the impact of a teacher professional development program (TPDP) on their views regarding utilizing computers in science education. Forty-three in-service science teachers from different regions of Turkey attended a 5 day TPDP. The TPDP was structured in modules designed using inquiry-based interactive computer simulations (IBICS). The participants created modules on different science subjects during the TPDP. Their progression was evaluated by micro-teaching sessions. Mixed methods research was used. The data were gathered by a survey and semi-structured interviews. Findings indicate that most of the science teachers initially lacked the necessary skills and knowledge for using computers in teaching. However, after the TPDP majority of them developed positive views on using computers in teaching and learning. Also, for teachers the TPDP provided ways and methods of successful integration of ICTs in teaching.
Keywords: Maximum training individualization, development of potential, pedagogic concept, vocational ability, students’ vocational ability
References
Abdykarimov, B., Egorov, V. & Iavorskaia G. (2006). Development of models and algorithms for automated evaluation of knowledge using artificial intelligence technologies. Karaganda: Karaganda State Technical University.
Abylkasymova, A. (2000). Didactic bases of teaching in higher school. Almaty: Altynsarin National Academy of Education.
Altynay, B. (2015). Formation of the Professional Competence of the Future Specialists. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 185, 141-145.
Aminov, N. (1997). Pedagogical abilities diagnostics. Moskow: Experimantal Psychology Institute.
Antonova, Е. (2010). The concept of talented students’ education at higher pedagogical educational institutions. Science vector of Tolyatti National University, 3, 54-65.
Gardner, H. (1998). Are there additional intelligences? The case for naturalist, spiritual, and existential intelligences. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Gaysina, G. (2015). Technology of Future Teacher Development as the Subject of Professional Culture. Asian Social Science, 11(1), 159.
Kaya, F. (2015). Teachers' Conceptions of Giftedness and Special Needs of Gifted Students. Egitim ve Bilim, 40, 177-186.
Khairullin, G. (2005). Communication and self-understanding. Almaty: Zhazushy.
Kuzmina, N. (1985). Abilities, talent, teacher’s talent. Leningrad: Znanie.
Li, H., He, Z., & Li, S. (2015). Teaching innovation and practice of the basic computer course based on the principle of individualized teaching and classified cultivation. Computer Science & Education, 1, 867-869.
Li, J. (2016). The Chinese Model of Teacher Education. Chinese Education Models in a Global Age, 249-264.
Mayer, J., Caruso, D., & Salovey, P. (1999). Emotional Intelligence meets traditional standards for an intelligence. Intelligence, 27, 267-298.
Musin, K. (2000). The system of continuous pedagogical education in Kazakhstan, Russia, England and the United States. Almaty: Gylym.
Popescu-Mitroi, M., Todorescu, L., & Greculescu, A. (2015). The Impact of Psycho-pedagogical Training on Communicative Competence. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 2443-2447.
Rezakov, R. (2002). Socio-pedagogical conditions of the intellectual elite formation in the system of continuous education: thesis. Moscow: AST.
Sadykov, T. (2005). Intellectual image of the future. Almaty: Edelveis.
Simonenko, V. (2006). General and vocational pedagogy: manual for graduate students. Moskow: Ventana-Graf.
Sternberg, R. (2002). Practical intelligence. Saint Petersburg: Piter.
The concept of identification, support and development talented children in the Republic of Kazakhstan (1999). Resource book Republican Research and Practice Centre “Daryn”, 3, 3-24.
Trost, G. (1999). The ability to predict success in school, university, at work. Foreign psychology, 11, 19-29.
Uzakbaeva, S., & Kozhakhmetova, K. (1997). The use of materials of the Kazakh ethnopedagogics when studying pedagogical disciplines. Almaty: Oner.
Vikulina, М. (2001). Designing and implementing a person-centered process of preparing lecturers in higher school: thesis synopsis. Orenburg: Nauka.
Viunova, N. (1999). Theoretical bases of integration and differentiation of psychological and pedagogic education of university students. Moscow: AST.