The present rapid technological progress and the post-crisis period determine the increasing demand for revision of existing concepts and strategies aimed at maintaining global development. This article describes pedagogical technologies, indicates the need to reform the outdated education systems or to reject them completely in order to improve productivity of students. The authors provided a comparative analysis of pedagogical technologies used in higher educational institutions, their strengths, weaknesses and development prospects. The study considered the approaches suggested by domestic and foreign researchers, clarified definitions, classification, typology, as well as specific features and setbacks of pedagogical technologies. The authors developed a training system, which implies direct involvement of each student into the learning process. The study specified the purpose of learning, which implied development of student creative abilities to get new experience. The authors proposed substitution of "authoritarian" relations between the student and the teacher for "partnerships" that could improve their relationship, mutual understanding and general efficiency. Comparison of pedagogical technologies provides their detailed description, the ability to select the most appropriate methods and approaches based on the requirements of relevant disciplines that will meet the highest quality standards for students and teachers.

Ai-lan, L. I. U. (2007). On the application of suggestive teaching method in chemistry teaching. Journal of Hubei Normal University, 3, 25-32.

Angeli, C., & Valanides, N. (2009). Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT–TPCK. Computers & Education, 52(1), 154-168.

Babanskii, N. K. (1977). Professional training skill. Moscow.

Bespalko, V. P. (1995). Education and advanced training technologies. Moscow.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education. Routledge.

Davydov, V. V. (1995). On the concept of developmental training. Pedagogy, 995, 29-40.

Dyachenko, V. K. (2004). Collective teaching method. Moscow: Publishing house "Education".

García-Peñalvo, F. J., Colomo-Palacios, R., & Lytras, M. (2012). Outcomes of international research projects on technology applied to education. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(1), 1-4.

Galimova, E.G. & Shvetsova, M.G. (2016). Modern Educational Technologies in Teaching Senior Secondary Pupils’ Communication in the Form of a Monologue and in Generating Their Cognitive Interest. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 11(8), 1951-1962. doi: 10.12973/ijese.2016.569a

Gitman, E. K. (2015). Concentrated training technology in vocational training. Psychological and pedagogical sciences, 2, 24-37.

Goldshmid, B. & Goldshmid, M. L. (1972). Modular Instruction in higher education. Higher education, 6, 36-47

Khristosenko, I. V. (1996). Probability Education: Psychologist view. School technology, 3, 57-88.

Kudryavtsev, V. T. (1991). Problem learning: origins, nature, perspective. Moscow: Knowledge.

Liaudis, V. J. (1997). The new paradigm of practical psychology and education. Psychological review, 3, 102-109.

Lobok, A. (1996). Probabilistic education. Education, 10, 151-155.

Makhmutov, M. I. (1975). Problem-based training: basic questions of the theory. Pedagogy, 994, 15-21.

Myasoyed, T. A. (2004). Interactive learning technologies. Special seminar for teachers, 46-49.

Ostapenko, A. A. (1999). Concentrated training: models of educational technology. School technology, 5, 116-154.

Peeraer, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2012). Measuring integration of information and communication technology in education: An item response modeling approach. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1247-1259.

Postlethwait, S. N., Novak, I. & Murray, U. T. (1972). The audio-Tutorial Aproach to learning. Minneapolies: Burgess Publishing.

Rock, A. J., Coventry, W. L., Morgan, M. I., & Loi, N. M. (2016). Teaching Research Methods and Statistics in eLearning Environments: Pedagogy, Practical Examples, and Possible Futures. Frontiers in psychology, 7, 86-92.

Rudy, S. (2016). Consultancy, disruption, and the pulse of pedagogy. Teaching and Learning Together in Higher Education, 1(11), 12.

Sarkar, S. (2012). The role of information and communication technology (ICT) in higher education for the 21st century. Science, 1(1), 30-41.

Selwyn, N. (2012). Education in a digital world: Global perspectives on technology and education. Routledge.

Tondeur, J., Van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134-144.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1991). Pedagogic psychology. Pedagogy, 986, 17-23.

Watson, D., & Tinsley, D. (2013). Integrating information technology into education. Springer.

Willis, J. (2008). Qualitative research methods in education and educational technology. New York: IAP.

Yu, T., & Jo, I. H. (2014, March). Educational technology approach toward learning analytics: Relationship between student online behavior and learning performance in higher education. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 269-270). ACM.

Yutsyavichene, P. Y. (1989). Theory and practice of modal education. Kaunas: Shviesa.

Zeer, E. F. (2015). Strategic guidelines for upgrading vocational teacher education: Discussion aspect of scientific dialogue.

Kryukova, E. A. (2013). The Ket Language: From Descriptive Linguistics to Interdisciplinary Research.  Tomsk Journal LING &. ANTROPO, 1(1).