(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 2197-2206 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.560a | Article Number: ijese.2016.184
Published Online: June 16, 2016
Abstract
Modern reality brings certain corrections to the understanding of forms and methods of teaching various courses in higher educational institution. A special role among the educational techniques and means in the college educational environment is taken by the modern technologies, such as using the techniques, means and ways, which are aimed at student’s active participation and involvement in the educational and mentoring process, i.e. using the interactive methods in education process. Educational environment, which is aimed at activation of students’ creative activity on the basis of using interactive educational forms, methods and means, facilitates the development of students’ knowledge and abilities to work with information sources, communication with the pedagogic process participants and development of problem-solving skills, i.e. leads to the development of the key competencies – informational, communicative and problem-solving competences.
Keywords: Education, society, competence, teacher, technologies, educational and mentoring process
References
Antonov, A.V. (1978). Psikhologiyaizobretatelnogotvorchestva [Psychology of Inventive Creativity]. Kiev: Vishashkola.
Bim-Bad, B.M. (2002). Pedagogicheskiyentsiklopedicheskiyslovar [Pedagogical Encyclopedic Dictionary]. Moscow, p. 107.
Bogdanovich, N.V. (2003). Kategorialnyypodkhod k istoriipsikhologii. Sovremennayapsikhologiya: Sostoyanieiperspektivyissledovaniy [Categorical approach to the history of psychology. Contemporary Psychology: Research Status and Prospects], P. 4. Moscow: Izd-vo In-ta psikhologii RAN, pp. 203-216.
Bush, G.Ya. (1981). Analogiiitekhnicheskoetvorchestvo [Analogies and technical creativity]. Riga: Avots.
Chaklikova, A.T. (2007). Kategorii “competentnost” i “kompetentsiya” v sovremennoyobrazovatelnoy paradigm [Categories of "competence" and "competency" in the modern educational paradigm]. VestnikKazNU. Seriyapedagogicheskienauki, 2, pp. 9-16.
Evgenyevoy, A.P. (1985-1988). Slovarrusskogoyazyka [Russian dictionary], v 4 t. Moscow: Russkiyyazyk, p. 696.
Granovskaya, T.M., Bereznaya, I.Ya. (1991). Intuitsiyaiiskusstvennyy intellect [Intuition and artificial intelligence]. Leningrad: IzdatelstvoLeningradskogouniversiteta, p. 272.
Guzeev, V.V. (2000). Planirovanierezultatovobrazovaniyaiobrazovatelnayatekhnologiya [Planning of educational outcomes and educational technology]. Moscow: Narodnoeobrazovanie, p. 240.
Korsakova, N.K. (1997). Neuspevayuschiedeti: neyropsikhologicheskayadiagnostikatrudnosteyobucheniya u mladshikhshkolnikov [Underachieving children: neuropsychological diagnosis of learning difficulties in primary school children]. Moscow.
Kunitsina, V.N. (2001). Mezhlichnostnoeobschenie [Interpersonal communication]. Sankt-Peterburg: Piter.
LektsiyaPrezidentaRespubliki Kazakhstan N.A. Nazarbaeva v EvraziyskomNatsionalnomUniversiteteimeni L.N. Gumileva [Lecture by President of the Republic of Kazakhstan N.A. Nazarbayev in Eurasian National University named after LN Gumilyov].
Luneva, O.V. (2008). Istoriyaissledovaniyasotsialnogointellekta [The history of the study of social intelligence]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie, 4, pp. 177-182.
Mikhaylova (Aleshina), E.S. (1996). Metodikaissledovaniyasotsialnogointellekta. Rukovodstvopoispolzovaniyu [Methods of study of social intelligence. Instructions for use]. Saint-Petersburg: GP Imaton.
Slobodchikov, V.I. (1997). Obrazovatelnayasreda: realizatsiyatseleyobrazovaniya v prostranstvekultury. Novyetsennostiobrazovaniya: kulturnyemodelishkoly [Educational Environment: implementation of the goals of education in the area of culture. The new value of education: cultural school model]. Moscow.
Sorokin, N.D. (2005). Ob innovatsionnykhmetodakh v prepodavaniisotsiologicheskikhkursov [On innovative methods in teaching sociology courses]. Sotsis, 8, pp. 120-125.
Spirkin, A.G. (1979). O tvorcheskoysilechelovecheskogorazuma [On the creative power of the human mind]. Moscow: Progress, p. 352.
Spirkin, A.G. (1988). Osnovyfilosofii. Uchebnoeposobiedlyavuzov [Core philosophy. Textbook for high schools]. Moscow: Politizdat, p. 592.
Ushakov, D.V. (2004). Sotsialnyy intellect kak vid intellekta. Sotsialnyyintelleht: teoriya, izmerenie, issledovaniya [Social intelligence as a kind of intelligence. Social Intelligence: Theory, measurement, research]. Moscow: Institutpsikhologii RAN, pp. 11-29.
Zhelunitsyna, M. (2001). Produktivnayadeyatelnostdeteystarshegodoshkolnogovozrasta [Productive activity of children of the senior preschool age]. Doshkolnoevospitanie, 11, pp. 29-32.
Zhukov, G.N. (2005). Osnovyobscheyprofessionalnoypedagogiki. Uchebnoeposobie [Fundamentals of general vocational education. Tutorial]. Moscow: Gardariki, p. 382.