(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 409-420 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.328a | Article Number: ijese.2016.011
Published Online: March 10, 2016
Abstract
Biology that is a branch of science examining organisms in every aspect has a very wide content. Besides this wide content, there are abstract concepts in some subjects. Various alternative conceptions are determined in different education levels especially in abstract and microscopic biology subjects. The aim of this study is to determine the alternative conceptions of pre-service teachers related with the genetic material in gametes and somatic cells. 97 pre-service teachers that are freshmen at university participated in the research. In order to determine the alternative conceptions about the subject, open-ended questions are asked to the pre-service teachers. Also, 12 pre-service teachers amongst 97 pre-service teachers are selected for semi-structured interviews and interviews are performed. Analysing the data obtained from the open-ended questions and interviews, it is determined that pre-service teachers have many alternative conceptions about the genetic materials in gametes and somatic cells. These alternative conceptions are introduced in categories and discussed.
Keywords: alternative conceptions, autosome, gonosomes, pre-service teachers
References
Bahar, M. (2002). Students’ learning difficulties in biology: reasons and solutions. Kastamonu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,10(1), 73-82.
Bahar, M., Johnstone, H. A., & Hansell, M. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education,33(2), 84-87.
Brown, C.R. (1990). Some misconceptions in meiosis shown by students responding to an advanced level practical examination question in biology. Journal of Biological Education. 24(3), 182-185.
Chattopadhyay, A. (2012). Understanding of mitosis and meiosis in higher secondary students of Northeast India and the implications for genetics education. Education, 2(3), 41-47.
Dikmenli, M. (2010). Misconceptions of cell division held by student teachers in biology: a drawing analysis. Scientific Research and Essay, 5 (2), 235-247.
Fisher, K. M. (1985). A Misconception in biology: amino acids and translation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 22, 53–62.
Frankel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2003). How to design and evaluate research in education. (Fifth Edition) New York: McGraw Hill.
Hazel, E. H., & Prosser, M. (1994). First-year university students’ understanding of photosynthesis, their study strategies and learning context. The American Biology Teacher. 56(5), 274-279.
Johnstone, H. A., & Mahmoud, N. A. (1980). Isolating topics of high perceived difficulty in school biology. Journal of Biological Education, 14(2), 163-166.
Kindfield, A. C. H. (1991). Confusing chromosome number and structure: a common student error. Journal of Biological Education, 25(3), 193-200.
Kindfield, A. C. H. (1994). Understanding a basic biological process: expert and novice models of meiosis. Science Education, 78(3) 255-283.
Lazarowitz, R., & Penso, P. (1992). High school students’ difficulties in learning biology concepts. Journal of Biological Education, 26(3), 215-223.
Lewis, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). Genes, chromosomes, cell division and inheritance–do students see any relationship? International Journal of Science Education, 22, 177-197.
Lewis, J., Leach, J., & Wood-Robinson, C. (2000). What's in a cell? - young people's understanding of the genetic relationship between cells, within an individual. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 129 – 132.
Lonergan, T. A. (2000). The photosynthetic dark reactions do not operate in the dark. The American Biology Teacher, 62(3), 166-170.
Mak, S. Y., Yip, D.Y., & Chung, C.M. (1999). Alternative conceptions in biology-related topics of integrated science teachers and implications for teacher education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(2), 161-170.
Öztaş, H., Özay, E., & Öztaş, F. (2003). Teaching cell division to secondary school students: an investigation of difficulties experienced by Turkish teachers. Journal of Biological Education, 38(1), 13-15.
Pashley, M. (1994). A-level students: their problems with gene and allele. Journal of Biological Education, 28(2), 120-126.
Quinn, F., Pegg, J., & Panizzon, D. (2009). First‐year biology students’ understandings of meiosis: an investigation using a structural theoretical framework. International Journal of Science Education, 31(10), 1279-1305.
Sanders, M. (1993). Erroneous ideas about respiration: the teacher factor. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 919–934.
Smith, M. U. (1991). Teaching cell division: students’ difficulties and teaching recommendations. Journal of College Science Teaching. 21, 28-33.
Songer, C. J., & Mintzes, J. J. (1994). Understanding cellular respiration and analysis of conceptual change in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 621-637.
Soyibo, K. (1993). Some sources of student’s misconceptions in biology: A review. Third misconceptions seminar proceedings. The Proceedings of the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics. Publisher Location: Ithaca, NY.
Tsai, C.C. (1999). Overcoming junior high school students’ misconceptions about microscopic views of phase change: a study of an analogy activity. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 8(1), 83-91.
Turney, J. (1995). The Public Understanding of genetics –where next? European Journal of Genetics Society, 1(2), 5-20.
Venville, G., Gribble., S.J. & Donovan, J. (2005). An exploration of young children’s understandings of genetics concepts from ontological and epistemological perspectives. Science Education, 89, 614– 633.
Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novak, D. J. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In Gabel, D. L. (Ed), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching and Learning. Macmillan, New York, p. 177-210.
Westbrook, S. L., & Marek, E. A. (1991). A cross-age study of student understanding of concept of diffusion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28 (8), 649-660.
Wood-Robinson, C., Lewis, J., & Leach, J., (2000. Young people’s understanding of the nature of genetic information in the cells of an organism. Journal of Biological Education, 35(1), 29 – 36.
Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2011). An interactive modeling lesson increases students’ understanding of ploidy during meiosis. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 39(5), 344–351.
Wynne, C. F., Stewart, J., & Passmore, C. (2001). High school students’ use of meiosis when solving genetics problems.International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 501-515.
Yip, D. Y. (1998). Identification of misconceptions in naive biology teachers and remedial strategies for improving biology learning. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 461-477.