(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 2147-2157 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.585a | Article Number: ijese.2016.180
Published Online: June 14, 2016
Abstract
The article reflects some theoretical aspects of humanization of interpersonal relationships in the sphere of education. The notion “humanization of interpersonal relationships” is being analyzed. The authors offer a characterization of some parameters of relationships: orientation, modality, valence, intensity, awareness, differentiation, complexity, level of development, width, emotionality, presence of mutual understanding, cognitive identification of the subjects of interaction with each other. Interpersonal relationships have various qualitative characteristics. We can define negative, indifferent and positive interpersonal relationships. According to the authors` comparative and descriptive position, negative type of interpersonal relationships corresponds to inhumane or egoistic interpersonal relationships, the indifferent type corresponds to neutral interpersonal relationships, and the positive type corresponds to humane interpersonal relationships. We show empiric results of our research of humane interpersonal relationships in the teaching staff of various educational establishments of the Russian Federation.
Keywords: Humanization of interpersonal relationships, humane interpersonal relationships, neutral interpersonal relationships, inhumane interpersonal relationships
References
Andreeva, G.M. (1999). Social Psychology. Moscow, Aspect Press, 368 p.
Asmolov, A.G. (1996). Cultural-historical psychology and design worlds. Moscow: Institute of Practical Psychology; Voronezh: MODEK, 768 p. St. 48.
Myasischev, V.N. (1995). Psychology relations. Moscow, Institute of Applied Psychology, MODEK, 246 p.
Obozov, N.N. (1979). Interpersonal relations. Leningrad: Leningrad State University, 6 p.
Petrovsky, V.A. (1992). Phenomena of subjectivity in the development of personality. Samara: Publishing House of the SSU, 168 p.
Kleptsova, E.Yu. (2012). Humanization of interpersonal relations in the educational activity. Kirov: Izd VyatGGU, 287 p.
Kleptsova, E.Yu. (2013a). Monitoring of the humanization of interpersonal relations in educational activities. Bulletin of the Cherepovets State University, 1 (46). V. 2: 133-135.
Kleptsova, E.Yu. (2013b). Psychological characteristics of humane interpersonal relations and issues of psychological support of professional deformation and destructive behavior of teaching and administrative staff of educational institutions. Bulletin of the Vyatka State University of Humanities, 2 (3): 144-151.
Kleptsova, E.Yu. (2013c). Psychological structure of humane interpersonal relations of subjects of educational activity. Education and self-development, 3 (37): 28-36.
Kleptsova, E.Yu. (2013d). Types of interpersonal relationships. Bulletin of Samara Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 15 (2): 382-387.