(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 2135-2145 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.586a | Article Number: ijese.2016.179
Published Online: June 14, 2016
Abstract
The article discusses the methodological basis of creating effective system for intellectual work management at the higher education institution. The study of the intellectual work management is caused by the need of today's complicated socio-economic, organizational and educational systems to obtain reliably reproducible repercussions from future professionals based on scientific approach to management. We propose a methodology for intellectual work management, based on the interaction of complex concepts such as intellectual resource, intellectual process, intellectual potential, and intellectual capital. The intellectual resource can be considered as a combination of knowledge, technologies and scientific discoveries in the course of research and development (R&D) activities. The iintellectual potential ensures a high rate of acquiring new knowledge. Intelligence, as a mentality quality, promotes adaptation to changes in learning based on the experience, comprehension, and application of knowledge. Intellectual capital of the education institution consists of knowledge, accumulated while implementing educational programs and providing educational services, as well as knowledge structures and intellectual value. We believe that their interpenetration and mutual reinforcement allows solving many fundamental, specific and applied problems of intellectual work management. The study of the students’ intellectual work within the described methodological framework of management science, in our opinion, forms a coherent system of representations about the attitude of employers to the intellectual work of future professionals that increases their manageability.
Keywords: Intellectual work management, intellectual resource, intellectual process, intellectual potential, intellectual capital
References
Abdikeev, N.M., and Kiselev, A.D., (2011). Knowledge Management and Business Reengineering, Infra-M.
Beckman, T.A., (1997). Methodology for Knowledge Management, in: International Association of Science and Technology for Development (IASTED), Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing, Banff, Canada.
Bontis, N., (2001). Assessing Knowledge Assets: a Review of the Models Used to Measure Intellectual Capital, International Journal of Management Reviews, 3(1), 41-60..
Borisov, A.F., and Bakhenskaya, M.V., (2010). Intellectual Capital of Non-Profit Educational Organization as an Object of Social Control, Social Management: Quality, Technology, Innovation. Ed. by Volchkova L.T., Sankt-Petersburg, St. Petersburg State University. Pp. 34-43.
Büchel, B., and Raub, S., (2002). Building Knowledge-Creating Value Networks, European Management Journal, 20(6), 587-596.
Bukovich, W., and Williams, R., (2002). Knowledge Management: a Guidelines for Action, Moscow: Infra-M, 156 p.
Ilyenkova, S.D., (2007). Innovation Management. Moscow: Unity-Dana.
Kryshtafovich, A.N., (2003). Knowledge Management as a Promising Area of Management, Management in Russia and Abroad, 1, 42-51.
Lukicheva, L.I., (2007). Management of Intellectual Capital, Moscow: Omega-L.
Rumyantseva, Z.P., (2003). Knowledge Management in the Educational Environment of the University, State University of Management, Bulletin of the University, 1, 42-51.
Stewart, T.A., (2007). Intellectual Capital. The New Source of Organizations’ Wealth, Publishing House "Pokolenuje".