In terms of sustainability, renewable resources, nourishment and healthy diet, crops are important to the public. Thus, knowledge of crops is needed in order to enable people to participate in public discussions and take responsibility. This is in contrast to former surveys showing that students’ knowledge of and interest in plants in general, crop plants and agricultural issues is moderate to little. At the same time, approaches to improving knowledge and interest in school are missing. We initiated and established the Greenhouse Project (GHP) where secondary school students (grades 5-13) get to know crops through cultivating from seed to seed. To investigate whether or not original contact with a variety of staple crops and hands-on activities positively affect students’ knowledge, students of two German secondary schools were asked via questionnaires before and after the treatment. Our study was conducted in the cities of Mainz and Wiesbaden which are situated in the German Federal states of Rhineland-Palatinate and Hesse, respectively. In total, 74 students in 6/7th and 11/12th grades took part in this pretest-posttest survey; three additional 6/7th and 11/12th grade classes (i.e. 48 students) were used as control classes, and had no contact with the GHP during this time. We demonstrated that the treatment has positive effects on students’ knowledge, and that girls performed better than did boys. Therefore, knowledge of crop plant species, as well as morphological knowledge, improved. A higher level of knowledge cannot only be observed objectively via test scores, but also subjectively via the students’ self-assessment of knowledge. In contrast, the students’ opinions about and attitudes towards agriculture and crops decreased in the posttest, both in the treatment and control classes. 

Ammer, U., & Gössinger, L. (2010). Was wissen bayerische Schulkinder über den Wald? [What do Bavarian pupils know about the forest?] Schutzgemeinschaft Deutscher Wald LV Bayern e. V. Waldpädagogik. Unser Wald, 1, 10–12.

Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspectives on science learning. In: Abell, S. K. & Lederman, N. G. (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 3–30). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Atkinson, E. P., & White, R. T. (1981). Influence of practical work on test performance. Research in Science Education, 11, 87–93.

Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Nature-based excursions: School students’ perceptions of learning in natural environments. International Research in Geographical and  Environmental Education, 11(3), 218–236.

Barman, C. R., Stein, M., McNair, S., & Barman, N. S. (2006). Student’s ideas about plants &  plant growth. The American Biology Teacher, 68(2), 73–79.

Bebbington, A. (2005). The ability of A-level students to name plants. Journal of Biological  Education, 39(2), 63–67.

Behrendt, M. & Franklin, T. (2014). A review of research on school field trips and their value in education. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 9, 235–245.

Benkowitz, D. (2010). Authentische Lernumgebung als Zugang zu Biodiversität – Kompetenzerwerb durch Schulgartenarbeit [Authentic learning environment as access to biodiversity – acquirement of competence by school gardening] (155-159). In: U. Feut, H. Korn (2010). Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt IX. Interdisziplinärer Forschungsaustausch im Rahmen des Übereinkommens über die biologische Vielfalt. BfN [Federal Agency for Nature Conservation]-Skripten 265.

Berck, K. H. & Graf, D. (2010). Biologiedidaktik. Grundlagen und Methoden. [Didactics of biology. Fundamentals and methods]. Wiebelsheim: Quelle & Mayer Verlag.

Bickel, M., & Bögeholz, S. (2013). Schülerinteressen an landwirtschaftlichen Themen. [Interest of students on agricultural topics]. In: J. Friedrich, A. Halsband, & L. Minkmar (Hg.). Biodiversität und Gesellschaft. Gesellschaftliche Dimension von Schutz und Nutzung biologischer Vielfalt. Beiträge der Fachtagung, Göttingen. (59-72). Göttingen: Universitätsverlag.

Bigler, A. M., & Hanegan, N. L. (2011). Student content knowledge increases after  participation in a hands-on biotechnology intervention. Journal of Science Education Technology, 20, 246–257.

Brämer, R. (2006). Natur obskur. Wie Jugendliche heute Natur erfahren. [Obscure nature. How teenagers experience nature today]. Munich, Germany: Oekom Verlag.

Burch, G. F., Batchelor, J. H., Heller, N. A., Shaw, J., Kendall, W. & Turner, B. (2014). Experiential learning – what do we know? A meta-analysis of 40 years of research. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 41, 279–283.

Burrows, G. E. (2012). Recognising differences in weed and crop species – Recognition skills of agriculture students.Bioscience Education, (19).

Cooper, C. L. (2008). Botanical knowledge of a group of South Carolina elementary school students. Ethnobotany Research & Applications, 6, 121–127.

Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2011). Children’s ability to recognise toxic and non-toxic fruits. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 7(2), 115–120.

Freund, P. A., Kuhn, J. T., & Holling, H. (2011). Measuring current achievement motivation  with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance.  Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 629–634.

Gatt, S., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Borg, K., & Lautier, K. (2007). Young Maltese children’s ideas about  plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41(3), 117–122.

Haury, D. L., & Rillero, P. (1994). What is hands-on learning, and is it just a fad? In: Perspectives of Hands-On Science Teaching, The ERIC Clearinghouse of Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Columbus, OH. http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/science/eric/eric-1.htm

Hess, A. J. , & Trexler, C. J. (2011). A qualitative study of agricultural literacy in urban  youth: What do elementary students understand about the agri-food system?. Journal of Agricultural Education, 52(4), 1–12.

Hesse, M. (2002). Eine neue Methode zur Überprüfung von Artenkenntnissen bei Schülern. Frühblüher: Benennen – Selbsteinschätzen – Wiedererkennen [A new method to test students’ knowledge of species. Early bloomers: Naming – self-assessment – recognizing]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 8, 53–67.

Holstermann, N., & Bögeholz, S. (2007). Interesse von Jungen und Mädchen an naturwissenschaftlichen Themen am Ende der Sekundarstufe I [Boys’ and girls’ interest in science at the end of middle school]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 13, 71–86.

Holstermann, N., Grube, D., & Bögeholz, S. (2010). Hands-on activities and their influence  on students’ interest. Research in Science Education, 40, 743–757.

Hummel, E., Glück, M., Jürgens, R., Weisshaar, J., & Randler, C. (2012). Interesse,  Wohlbefinden und Langeweile im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterricht mit lebenden Organismen [Interest, wellbeing and boredom in science class with living organisms]. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, (18), 99–116.

Jakobson, S.K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2006). Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques. Oxford University Press.

Jäkel, L., & Schaer, A. (2004). Sind Namen nur Schall und Rauch? Wie sicher sind Pflanzenkenntnisse von Schülerinnen und Schülern? [Are names hollow words? How certain is students’ knowledge of plants?]. Berichte des Instituts für Didaktik der Biologie der Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster, 13, 1–24.

Jäkel, L. (2005). Alltagspflanzen im Fokus: Botanisches Lernen in Zusammenhängen – eine  didaktische Herausforderung im Alltagsunterricht [Focus on daily life plants. Botanical learning in contexts – a didactical challenge in class]. Praxis der Naturwissenschaften, 54(3), 15–20.

Jewell, N. (2002). Examining children’s models of seed. Journal of Biological Education,  36(3), 116–122.

Kersting, M., Alexy, U., Kroke, A., & Lentze, M.J. (2004). Kinderernährung in Deutschland.  Ergebnisse der DONALD-Studie [Nourishment of children in Germany. Result of  the  DONALD-survey]. Bundesgesundheitsblatt – Gesundheitsforschung –  Gesundheitsschutz, 47(3), 213–218.

Kinchin, I. M. (1999). Investigating secondary-school girls’ preferences for animals or plants:  A simple ´head-to-head´ comparison using two unfamiliar organisms. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 95–99.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/kolb.pdf.

Lindemann‐Matthies, P. (2005). ‘Loveable’ mammals and ‘lifeless’ plants: How children's  interest in common local organisms can be enhanced through observation of nature. International Journal of Science Education, 27(6), 655–677.

Lineberger, S. E., & Zajicek, J. M. (2000). School gardens: Can a hands-on teaching tool  affect students’ attitudes and behavior regarding fruit and vegetables? Hort Technology, 10(3), 593–597.

Löwe, B. (1987). Interessenverfall im Biologieunterricht [Loss of interest in biology  class]. Unterricht Biologie, 124(11), 62–65.

Mensink, G. B. M., Kleiser, C., & Richter, A. (2007). Was essen Kinder und Jugendliche in  Deutschland? [What do children and teenagers eat in Germany?]. Ernährung- Wissenschaft und Praxis, 1(5), 204–212.

Nadeau, R., & Niemi, R. G. (1995). Educated guess: The process of answering factual  knowledge questions in surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 59(3), 323–346.

Nott, M., & Wellington, J. (1999). The state we’re in: Issues in key stage 3 and 4 science.  School Science Review, 81(294), 13–18.

Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and  primary students name? Where do they see them? International Journal of Science Education Technology, (20), 630–642.

Pergams, O. R., & Zaradic, P. A. (2006). Is love of nature in the US becoming love of  electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, Internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management, 80(4), 387–393.

Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Chudá, J. (2007a). Slovakian students’ attitudes towards biology.  Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(4), 287–295.

Prokop, P., Tuncer, G., & Kvasničák, R. (2007b). Short-term effects of field programme on  students’ knowledge and attitude toward biology: A Slovak experience. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 16(3), 247–255.

Randler, C., & Bogner, F. X. (2006). Cognitive achievements in identification skills. Journal of Biological Education, 40(4), 161–165.

Rheinberg, F., Vollmeyer, R., & Burns, B. D. (2001). FAM: Ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung  aktueller Motivation in Lern- und Leistungssituationen. [FAM: A questionnaire to  determine current motivation in situations of learning and achievement]Diagnostica,  47(2), 57–66.

Rolff, H. G., & Zimmermann, P. (1997). Kindheit im Wandel. Eine Einführung in die  Sozialisation im Kindesalter [Childhood change. An introduction to the socialization  in the childhood]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz Taschenbuch.

Schussler, E. E., & Olzak, L. A. (2008). It’s not easy being green: Student recall of plant and  animal images. Journal of Biological Education, 42(3), 112–119.

Stagg, B. C., & Donkin, M. (2013). Teaching botanical identification to adults: Experiences  of the UK participatory science project ‘Open Air Laboratories.’ Journal of Biological Education, 47(2), 104–110.

Strgar, J. (2007). Increasing the interest of students in plants. Journal of Biological Education, 42(1), 19–23.

Sula, J. (1971) Außerschulische Kenntnisse über Lebenserscheinungen der Pflanzen bei  Schülern der ersten Klasse [First grade students’ out of school knowledge about plants´ phenomenon of life]. BioS 6, 218–221.

Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Talking about plants – Comments of primary school groups looking  at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 27–34.

Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Reiss, M. J. (2000). Building a model of the environment: How do  children see plants? Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 172–177.

Wagner, G. E. (2008). Botanical knowledge of a group of college students in South  Carolina, U.S.A. Ethnobotany Research & Application, 6, 443–458.

Zucchi, H. (2002). Naturentfremdung bei Kindern und was wir entgegensetzen müssen. [Childrens’ alientation from nature and what we need to do?]. In: B. Gerken, & M. Görner (Eds.). Planung contra Evolution? Referate und Ergebnisse des gleichnamigen Symposiums 2001 in Neuhaus im Solling (pp. 1–31). Höxter, Germany.