(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 1195-1203 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.389a | Article Number: ijese.2016.110
Published Online: April 29, 2016
Abstract
The relevance of the "female" management features study is driven by the active penetration of women to management in various fields and the emergence of a new social category "Business-women". The article contains the results of a study aimed to identify the features of personal properties and structure of low-level, middle-level and top-level female managers. The theoretical basis of work is the main provisions of activity approach, according to which personal characteristics of managers were examined in accordance with the accounting requirements of the performed activity. Significant differences between selected personal characteristics and their structures in men and women managers were revealed, which were the basis for differentiated gender-based approach to their research. The results show that as a result of the special nature of the requirements to different levels of leadership, there are differences in expression and structural organization of basic acmeological characteristics of female Managers in different stages of their career success, which may be regarded as components of acmeological resource of a woman-manager personality. The article will be useful for academics in preparation of future Managers in the departments of management and psychology, and for human resources managers in organizing and conducting events for purpose of professional selection and vocational guidance to leadership positions.
Keywords: manager, levels of management hierarchy, career growth, basic personal traits of the Manager, the relationship of personality traits, comparative, correlation and divergent analyses
References
Andreeva Ju. V. (2002). The psychology of manager’s image. Kazan: “Centr innovacionnikh technologii”.
Chirikova, A. Y. (2000). Women leading companies: The problems of formation of women’s entrepreneurship in Russia. Issues of economy. №3, 94-102.
Derkach, A. A. (2002). Acmeology: Textbook [Text]. M.: Publishing house rags.
Il’in, E. P. (2003). Differential psychophysiology of men and women. SPb.: “Piter”.
Fetiskin, N. P., Kozlov V. V. & Manuylov, G. М. (2002). Social and psychological diagnosis of personality development and small groups, 263-265.
Hosgorur, T., & Apikoglu, S. (2013). Relationship Between School Administrators’ Anxiety Levels for Authority Use and Burnout Levels. Educational Process: International Journal, 2(1-2), 19-35.
Karpov, A. V. (2006) Peculiarities of structural organization of reflexive processes. Psychological journal, vol. 27. No. 6.
Kartal, S. E. (2016). Determining School Administrators’ Perceptions on Institutional Culture: A Qualitative Study. Educational Process: International Journal, 5(2), 152-166.
Khokhlova, T. P. (2001). Identification of gender aspects of management as a factor of increasing management efficiency. Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, №2, 67-74.
Levadnaya, M. O. (2001). On the willingness of civil servants to work in the conditions of crisis. Actualize needs in personal and professional development of civil servants. M.: Publishing house of Russian Academy of state service under the President of the Russian Federation.
Papadopoulou, V., & Yirci, R. (2013). Rethinking Decentralization in Education in terms of Administrative Problems. Educational Process: International Journal, 2(1-2), 7-18.
Rosener, J. B. (1990). Ways Women Lead. Haward business rev. Boston, Vol.68, №6, 74-85.
Rosin, H. M. & Korabik, K. (1991). Workplace Variables, Affective Responses, and Intention to Leave among Women Managers. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 64, 317-330.
Sahin, S. H. (2014). Comparison of Geography Self-Efficacy Levels of Students Taking Geography Course. Üniversitepark Bülten, 3(1-2).
Sekaran, U. (1990). Frontiers and New Vistas in Women in Management Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 247-255.
Schwartz, F. N. (1989). Management Women and the New Facts of Life. Harvard Business Review, 65-76.
Semyonova, F. О. (2011). Psychological characteristics of career ideas of women successfully fulfilling themselves in professional activities. Scientific notes of the university after P.F. Lesgaft. №3 (73), 21-30.
Symons, G. (2005). Women’s occupational careers in business: Managers a. Entrepreneurs in France. Canada.