(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 1127-1135 | DOI: 10.12973/ijese.2016.382a | Article Number: ijese.2016.109
Published Online: April 28, 2016
Abstract
The problem of demonstrative behavior is very topical among teenagers and this issue has become the subject of systematic scientific research. Demonstrative manifestations in adolescents disrupt the favorable socialization; therefore, understanding, prevention and correction of demonstrative behavior at this age is relevant and requires special attention. The purpose of the research is to examine and diagnose demonstrative behavior in adolescents (college students), as well as to develop and implement the program aimed at preventing demonstrative manifestations in adolescents. The experiment involved 90 first-year students of the Kazan College of Humanities and Social Sciences. The leading method in the study of this problem was the diagnostic testing that helped to reveal the level of demonstrativeness and personal accentuation of teenagers. The following diagnostic tools were applied: H. Schmieschek’s personality accentuation test (Schmieschek Fragebogen) designed to diagnose the type of personality accentuation; test on demonstrativeness. On the basis of the results of the ascertaining experiment, the program containing a variety of forms and methods of preventing demonstrative manifestations in adolescents was developed. Statistical analysis of empirical research was carried out by means of standard techniques of mathematical statistics (Student’s t-test). The given program has practical value to educators, psychologists and classroom teachers of secondary schools in the organization of the educational process.
Keywords: demonstrativeness, demonstrative manifestations in adolescents, demonstrative behavior, personality accentuation, adolescence
References
Bityanova, M. R. (2010). Social psychology. Moscow: International Pedagogical Academy.
Bozhovich, L. I. (2008). Personality and its formation in childhood. St. Petersburg: Piter.
El'konin, D. B. (1978). Psychology of games. Moscow: Pedagogika.
Gabdrakhmanova, R. G., Khuziakhmetov, A. N. & Yesnazarova, U. A. (2016). Pedagogical conditions of socialization of senior pupils in school labor unions. Mathematics Education, 11(1), 113-121.
Gannushkin, P. B. (1933). Clinic of psychopathy. Moscow: Sever.
Ilbay, A. B., & Akin, A. (2014). The Impact of Solution-Focused Brief Group Psychological Counseling on University Students’ Burnout Levels. Üniversitepark Bülten, 3(1-2).
Kasimova, R. S. & Valeeva, R.A. (2015). Development of Attention in Graders. The Social Sciences, 10, 765-768.
Kolominsky, Y. L., Pan’ko, E. A. & Igumnov, S. A. (2004). Mental development of children in health and disease. St. Petersburg: Peter.
Kostyunina, N. Yu. & Valeeva, R. A. (2015). Prevention and Correction of Juvenile Neglect. Review of European Studies, 7(5), 225-230.
Kravtsova, E. E. (2009). Pedagogy and psychology. Moscow: Forum.
Leonhard K. (1989). Accentuated personalities. Moscow: Phoenix.
Lichko, A. E. (2009). Psychopathy and accentuation of character in adolescents. St. Petersburg: Rech.
Novik, N. N. & Podgorecki, J. A. (2015). Model of developing communication skills among adolescents with behavioral problems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(4), 579-587.
Ozbey, A., & Saricam, H. (2016). Human Values and Compassionate Love in Highly Gifted Students and Normal Student. Educational Process: International Journal, 5(2), 116-127.
Pokrass, M. L. (2006). Active depression. Healing by selfishness. Samara: Publ.H. Bachrach-M.
Ribakova, L. A., Parfilova, G. G. & Karimova, L. S. (2014). Evolution of communicative competence in adolescents growing up in orphanages. Life Science Journal, 11(12s), 114-117.
Rogov, E. I. (1995). Handbook of practical psychologist in education. Moscow: VLADOS.
Sadovaya, V. V., Korshunova, O. V. & Nauruzbay, Zh. Zh. (2016). Personalized education strategies. Mathematics Education, 11(1), 199-209.
Sahin, S. H. (2014). Comparison of Geography Self-Efficacy Levels of Students Taking Geography Course. Üniversitepark Bülten, 3(1-2).
Salyakhova, G. I. & Valeeva, R. A. (2015). Pedagogical Stimulation of University Students’ Social Competence Development by Means of Interdisciplinary Integration. Review of European Studies, 7(5),186-192.
Schmieschek, H. !970). Fragebogen zur Ermittlung akzentuierter Personlichkeiten. Psychiat. Neurol. med. Psychol. 10, 378.
Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Problems of children (age) psychology. St. Petersburg: Soyuz.
Zeer, E. F. (2007). Psychology of professional development: Manual for University students. Moscow: Publishing center "Academy".