Science education researchers have turned their attention to the use of images in textbooks, both because pages are heavily illustrated and because visual literacy is an important aptitude for science students. Text–image integration in the textbook is described here as composition schemes in increasing degrees of integration: prose primary (PP), prose subsumed (PS), and fully integrated (FI). These schemes enable experimental research with authentic media without diminishing complexity. Seventh grade subjects used media variants in a within-subjects design (N=158). Comprehension tests revealed higher comprehension for FI over PP media variants in one of three sessions (P=0.0073). FI scores were highest for the other tests but not significantly so (P>0.05). A post-test situational interest measure revealed a significant preference pattern of FI>PS>PP. As textbooks follow a general PP strategy, expansion and confirmation of the results would suggest increasing the degree of text–image integration for middle school science textbooks.

Akaygun, S., & Jones, L. L. (2014). Words or pictures: A comparison of written and pictorial explanations of physical and chemical equilibria. International Journal of Science Education 36(5), 783–807. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.828361

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers and Education 33, 131–152.

Alexander, P. A., Jetton, T. L., & Kulikowich, J. M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 87, 559–575.

Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., Airasian, P. W., Cruikshank, K. A., Mayer, R. E., Pintrich, P. R., et al. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives (complete edition). New York, NY: Longman.

Asher, S. R. (1980). Topic interest and children’s reading comprehension. In Spiro, R., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (Eds.), Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 525–534.

Baddeley, A. (1998). Working memory. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 321(2–3), 167–173.

Carroll, P. J., Young, J. R., & Guertin, M. S. (1992). A visual analysis of cartoons: A view from “The Far Side.” In K. Rayner, (Ed.), Eye movements and visual cognition 444–461. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.

Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children’s minds. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.


Chen, A., Darst, P. W., Pangrazi, R. P. (2001). An examination of situational interest and its sources. British Journal of Educational Psychology 71, 383–400. doi:10.1348/000709901158578

Chiappetta, E. L., Fillman, D. A., & Sethna, G. H. (1991). A method to quantify major themes of scientific literacy in science textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28(8), 713–725.

Chiappetta, E. L., & Koballa, T. R. (2002). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.


Dall’Alba, G., Walsh, E., Bowden, J., Martin, E., Masters, G., Ramsden, P., & Stephanou, A. (1993). Textbook treatments and students’ understanding of acceleration. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(7), 621–635. doi:10.1007/BF02356924

Dechsri, P., Jones, L. L., & Heikkinen, H. W. (1997). Effect of a laboratory manual design incorporating visual information-processing aids on student learning and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34(9), 891–904.

DiGisi, L. L., & Willett, J. B. (1995). What high school biology teachers say about their textbook use: A descriptive study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 32(2), 123–142.

DiGiuseppe, M. (2014). Representing nature of science in a science textbook: Exploring author-editor-publisher interactions. International Journal of Science Education 36(7), 1061–1082. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.840405

Finson, K., & Pederson, J. (2011). What are visual data and what utility do they have in science education? Journal of Visual Literacy 30(2), 20–39.

Good, R. (1993). Editorial: Science textbook analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 30(7), 619.

Hidi, S. (2006). Interest: A unique motivational variable. Educational Research Review, 1, 69–82. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2006.09.001

Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (1992). Interest, learning and development. In Renninger, A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 3–25). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Krapp, A., & Prenzel, M. (2011). Research on interest in science: Theories, methods, and findings. International Journal of Science Education 33(1), 27–50. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.518645

Lawson, A. E., Banks, D. L., & Logvin, M. (2007). Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44(5), 706–724. doi:10.1002/tea.20172

Lee, V. R. (2010). Adaptations and continuities in the use and design of visual representations in US middle school science textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 32(8), 1099–1126. doi:10.1080/09500690903253916

Levie, W. H., & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 195–232. doi:10.1007/BF02765184

Levin, J. R. (1979). On functions of pictures in prose. In Report from the project on studies in language: Reading and communication. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Individualized Schooling.

Lin, H., Hong, Z., & Chen, Y. (2013). Exploring the development of college students' situational interest in learning science. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2152–2173. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.818261

Lowe, R. K. (2000). Visual literacy and learning in science. ERIC Digest, 3–4. SE064310 EDO-SE-00-02.

Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text?: Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers and Education, 60, 95–109. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.07.011

Marzano, R. J., & Kendall, J. S. (2007). The new taxonomy of educational objectives (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Mayer, R. E., and Gallini, J. K. (1990). When is an illustration worth ten thousand words? Journal of Educational Psychology 82(4): 715–726.

Mayer, R. E., Steinhoff, K., Bower, G., & Mars, R. (1995). A generative theory of textbook design: Using annotated illustrations to foster meaningful learning of science text. Educational Technology and Research Development 43(1), 31–43. doi:10.1007/BF02300480

Miller, J. S., & Krumhansl, R. (2009). Learning from innovative instructional materials and making them your own. In Gess-Newsome, J., Luft, J. A., & Bell, R. (Eds.), Reforming secondary science instruction (pp. 39–52). National Science Teachers Association. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Mitchell, M. (1993). Situational interest: Its multifaceted structure in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology 85, 424–436.

National Education Goals Panel (1998). Recommendations regarding the implementation of standards. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from govinfo.library.unt.edu/negp/page1-13-9.htm.

Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance and monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 159–179. doi:10.1007/s10409-006-9595-6

Peña, B. M., & Quílez, J. M. G. (2001). The importance of images in astronomy education. International Journal of Science Education 23(11), 1125–1135. doi:10.1080/09500690110038611

Pettersson, R. (1998). Image functions in information design. The 30th annual conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia.

Plass, J. L., Moreno, R., & Brünken, R. (Eds.) (2010). Cognitive load theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pozzer, L. L., & Roth, W. M. (2003). Prevalence, function, and structure of photographs in high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40(10), 1089–1114. doi:10.1002/tea.10122

Reynolds, C. R., Livingston, R. B., & Willson, V. (2006). Measurement and assessment in education. Boston: Pearson.

Roseman, J. E., Stern, L., & Koppal, M. (2010). A method for analyzing the coherence of high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47(1), 47–70. doi:10.1002/tea.20305

Rotgans, J. I., & Schmidt, H. G. (2014). Situational interest and learning: Thirst for knowledge. Learning and Instruction 32, 37–50. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.002

Roth, W. M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36(9), 977–1019.


Sadoski, M., & Paivio, A. (2001). Imagery and text: A dual coding theory of reading and writing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299–323. doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136

Schnotz, W., & Kürschner, C. (2007). A reconsideration of cognitive load theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 469–508. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9053-4

Schraw, G. (1997). Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 436–459.

Schraw, G., & Lehman, S. (2011). Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review 13(1), 23–52. doi:10.1023/A:1009004801455

Stern, L., & Roseman, J. E. (2004). Can middle-school science textbooks help students learn important ideas? Findings from Project 2061’s curriculum evaluation study: Life science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41(6), 538–568. doi:10.1002/tea.20019

Swarat, S., Ortony, A., & Revelle, W. (2012). Activity matters: Understanding student interest in school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49(4), 515–537. doi:10.1002/tea.21010

Tapola, A., Veermans, M., & Niemivirta, M. (2013). Predictors and outcomes of situational interest during a science learning task. Instructional Science 41, 1047–1064. doi:10.1007/s11251-013-9273-6

Trefil, J., Calvo, R. A., & Cutler, K. (2005). McDougal Littell science, North Carolina edition, student edition, course 3. Evanston, IL: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Trend, R. (2005). Individual, situational and topic interest in geoscience among 11- and 12-year-old children. Research Papers in Education 20(3), 271–302,

Tversky, B. (2011). Visualizing thought. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 499–535. doi:10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01113.x

U. S. Department of Education [USDOE] (2010). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey, 2000–01, 2005–06, 2007–08, and 2008–09. National Center for Education Statistics, Common Core of Data (CCD).

Van Genuchten, E., Scheiter, K., & Schüler, A. (2012). Examining learning from text and pictures for different task types: Does the multimedia effect differ for conceptual, causal, and procedural tasks? Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 2209–2218. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.06.028

Vekiri, I. (2002). What is the value of graphical displays in learning?. Educational Psychology Review, 14(3): 261–312. doi:10.1023/A:1016064429161

Wake County Public School System [WCPSS] (2011). Demographics 2010–2011. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from www.wcpss.net/about-us/our-students/demographics/reports/book10.pdf.

Woodward, A. (1993a). Introduction: Learning from textbooks. In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. vii–x). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

Woodward, A. (1993b). Do illustrations serve an instructional purpose in U. S. textbooks? In B. K. Britton, A. Woodward, & M. Binkley (Eds.), Learning from textbooks: Theory and practice (pp. 115–134). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher.

Worthy, J. (1996). A matter of interest: Literature that hooks reluctant readers and keeps them reading. The Reading Teacher 50, 204–212.