(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 139-149 | Article Number: ijese.2019.012
Published Online: July 23, 2019
Abstract
This research aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a developed Future Thinking Test (FTT) using the Rasch measurement model. The FTT consisted of 12 items concerning knowledge of physical science which were scored using Rating Scale Model. Items were developed based on the five future thinking constructs: i) Understanding the current situation; ii) Identifying trends; iii) Analyzing relevant drivers; iv) Developing scenarios of possible and probable futures, and v) Selecting with justification the preferable futures. Rasch analyses were conducted on data from a sample of 66 tenth graders (36 females and 30 males, aged 16 years old) from two rural secondary schools in the Tawau district, Sabah, Malaysia. Overall, the FTT was found to have good reliability with a Cronbach’s alpha value (KR-20) of 0.69. Results also showed that FTT has an excellent item reliability and moderate high item separation value of 0.97 and 5.92 respectively. FTT also has a sufficient good person reliability and person separation value of 0.67 and 1.41 respectively. The sub-constructs are individually unidimensional and the future thinking with five sub-constructs are also unidimensional. Meanwhile, the validity of the FTT instrument was appropriately established through the item fit, except for one item. Results showed that 11 items were appropriate while one item needed to be discarded to increase the validity and reliability of FTT. This research indicates that FTT has an acceptable validity and reliability for measuring the five constructs of future thinking among tenth graders in rural secondary schools.
Keywords: futures thinking test, Rasch measurement model, tenth graders
References
Addis, D. R., Hach, S., & Tippett, L. J. (2016). Do strategic processes contribute to the specificity of future. Simulation in depression? British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 55(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12103
Amara, R. (1981). The futures field: Searching for definition and boundaries. Futures, 15(2), 25-29.
Bishop, P. C., & Hines, A. (2012). Teaching about the Future. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137020703
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2007). Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences (2nd eds.). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences (3rd eds.). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315814698
Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human sciences. The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4
Brown, A. D., Root, J. C., Romano, T. A., Chang, L. J., Bryant, R. A., & Hirst, W. (2013). Overgeneralized autobiographicalmemory and future thinking in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 44(1), 129-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.11.004
Carter, A. G., Creedy, D. K., & Sidebotham, M. (2015). Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 35(7), 864–874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.02.023
Cole, S. N., Morrison, C. M., & Conway, M. A. (2013). Episodic future thinking: Linking neuropsychological performance with episodic detail in young and old adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(9), 1687–1706. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.758157
Cooper, D., R., & Schindler, P., S. (2011). Bussines research methods. (11th eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Creswell, J., W. (2014). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th eds). USA: Pearson Education Limited.
D’Argembeau, A., Ortoleva, C., Jumentier, S., & Van Der Linden, M. (2010). Component processes underlying future thinking. Memory and Cognition, 38(6), 809–819. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.6.809
Furtunoto, V.J., & Furey, J.T. (2011). The theory of MindTime: The relationships between Future, Past and Present thinking and psychological well-being and distress. Personality and individual Differences, 50(1), 20-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.014
Gracia, S. (2005). Analyzing CSR Implementation with the Rasch Model” (2005). Faculty Publications. 271. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.ric.edu/facultypublications/271
Haapala, A. (2002). Mitä on tulevaisuuskasvatus (What is Future Education?). In A. Haapala (Eds.), Tulevaisuuskasvatus (The Future of Education) (pp. 125-140). Jyväskylä: PS-kustannus.
Ho, H. C., Wang, C. C., & Cheng, Y. Y. (2013). Analysis of the scientific imagination process. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 10, 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.04.003
Jailani, K. M. (2011). Manual Pengenalan Pengukuran Rasch and Winstep. Pengukuran dan Penilaian dalam Pendidikan (Introduction of Rasch and Winstep Measurement Introduction. Measurement and Evaluation in Education). Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.
Jones, A., Buntting, C., Hipkins, R., McKim, A., Conner, L., & Saunders, K. (2012). Developing students’ futures thinking in science education. Research in Science Education, 42(4), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-011-9214-9
Jusoh, M. S., Amlus, M., H., Osman, A., & Abidin, R. (2014). Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Measure: Manufacturing Practices, Knowledge Transfer and Manufacturing Capabilities in Malaysian Manufacturing Companies. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8(12), 25-29.
Khamis, M. R., & Che Yahya, N. (2015). Does Law Enforcement Influence Compliance Behaviour of Business Zakat among SMEs? An Evidence via Rasch Measurement Model. GJAT, 5(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.7187/GJAT752015.05.01
Klooster, P. M., Taal., E., & Laar, M. A. F. J. (2008). Rasch Analysis of the Dutch Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index and the Health Assessment Questionnaire II in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism (Arthritis Care & Research), 59(12), 1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24065
Krishnan, S., & Idris, N. (2014). Investigating Reliability and Validity for the Construct of Inferential Statistics. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 4(1), 51-60.
Linacre JM. 2009. A user’s guide to FACETS Rasch-model computer programs, program manual 3.65.0. Chicago, IL: Winsteps.com.
Maccallum, F., & Bryant, R. A. (2011). Imagining the future in complicated grief. Depression and Anxiety, 28(8), 658-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/da.20866
Martin-Ordas, G., Atance, C. M., Caza, J. S. (2014). How do episodic and semantic memory contribute to episodic foresight in young children? Frontiers in Psychology, 5(732), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00732
Md Yunos, J., Ibrahim Mukhtar, M., Alias, M., Lee, M. F., Tee, T.K., Rubani, S.N.K., Hamid, H., Yunus, F.A.N., Sulaiman, J., & Sumarwati, S. (2017). Validity of Vocational Pedagogy Constructs Using The Rasch Measurement Model. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 9(2), 35-45.
Noblet, C. L., Anderson, M. W., & Teisl, M. F. (2015). Thinking past, thinking future: An empirical test of the effects of retrospective assessment on future preferences. Ecological Economics, 114, 180-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.002
Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual-a Step by step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS fow Windows (Version 12). NWS Australian: Allen and Unwin.
Raffard, S., Esposito, F., Boulenger, J. P., & Van der Linden, M. (2013). Impaired ability to imagine future pleasant events is associated with apathy in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 209(3), 393-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2013.04.016
Reckase, M.D. (1979). Unifactor latent trait models applied to multifactor tests: Results and implications. Journal of Educational Statistics, 4, 207-230. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164671
Sabah State Education Department (2017). Senarai Sekolah Rendah Kategori Luar Bandar Dan Pedalaman Di Negeri Sabah (List of Rural and Inland Schools in Sabah). Retrieved from http://www.ums.edu.my/upplbv2/files/SENARAI-SEKOLAH-RENDAH-KATEGORI-LUAR-BANDAR-DAN-PEDALAMAN-DI-NEGERI-SABAH.pdf
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Episodic simulation of future events: Concepts, data and applications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.001
SEDIA (2011). Sabah Economic Development and Investment Authority Blueprint. Retrieved from http://www.sedia.com.my/
Sick, J. (2011). Rasch Measurement and Factor Analysis. Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1), 15-17.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-ilmu Sosial (edisi revisi). Application of the Rasch Model for Social Sciences Research (revised edition). Cimahi: Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Szpunar, K. K. (2010). Episodic future thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(2), 142–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691610362350
Tennant, A. & Pallant, J. F. (2006). Unidimensionality matters (A tale of two Smiths?). Rasch Measurement Transaction, 20 (1), 1048-1051.
Warren, A., Archambault, L., & Foley, R. W. (2014). Sustainability Education Framework for Teachers: Developing sustainability literacy through futures, values, systems, and strategic thinking. Journal of Sustainability Education, 6, 1-14.
Wright, B. D. (1999). Common sense for measurement. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 13(3), 704.
Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press.