Implementing the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model to Measure the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB)

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Gunung & Darma, 2019)
Your Bibliography: Gunung, I.N. & Darma, I.K. (2019). Implementing the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model to Measure the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(1), 33-39.

Harvard
In-text: (Gunung and Darma, 2019)
Your Bibliography: Gunung, I. and Darma, I. (2019). Implementing the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model to Measure the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB). International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 14(1), pp. 33-39.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Gunung and Darma 2019)
Your Bibliography: Gunung, I Nyoman and I K Darma (2019). "Implementing the Context, Input, Process, Product (CIPP) Evaluation Model to Measure the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Teaching at Politeknik Negeri Bali (PNB)". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 14 (1):33-39.

Abstract

This study aimed at finding out the level of effectiveness of the implementation of teaching at PNB viewed from the relatedness of the components of 1) context; 2) input), 3) process, and 4) product. This study used the CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product) model evaluation method. The data were collected using questionnaire, interview guide, and related documents. The subjects consisted of students, lecturers, and the management sfaff of departments in PNB. The data were analyzed descriptively and qualitatively. The effectiveness in the implementation of the teaching programs was determined by transforming the raw scores into the Z-scores and the T-scores, which were then verified into Glickman’s quadrant prototypes. The result of analysis showed that the effectiveness of the implementation of the teaching program at PNB viewed from the relatedness of context, input, process, and product falls into fairly effective category. While the obstacles in the implementation of the teaching programs at PNB include those in the components of context, input, process and product components. The outstanding obstacle occurs in the product variable.

Keywords: program evaluation, teaching, polytechnique, CIPP

References

Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of Education Measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., & Ross, G. J. M. (2000). Supervision and instructional leadership (5th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1990). Measurement and evaluation in teaching (Ed 6). New York: Macmillan Publishing co., Inc.

Hasan, H. (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum, cetakan kedua. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mirawati, A. S, & Saladung, J. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Kimia Pada SMA Negeri 3 Watansoppeng. Riset Assesmen Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 1(1).

Nasution. (2001). Manajemen Mutu Terpadu (Total Quality mangement), Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Permendikbud Nomor 49 Tahun 2014 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.

Sahertian, P. A. (2000). Konsep Dasar Dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Stuffelbeam, D. L., & Shinfield, A. J. (1986). Systematic Evaluation. Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing. USA.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In D. L. Stufflebeam & T. Kellaghan (Eds.), The international handbook of educational evaluation (Chapter 2). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models, & applications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0309-4_4

Suartika, I. N., Dantes, N., & Candiasa, I. M. (2013). Studi Evaluasi Program Praktek Kerja Industri (Prakerin) Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Pendidikan Sistem Ganda di SMK Negeri Susut. e-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Program Studi Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3, 1-11.

Sudjana, N. (2012). Penilain Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&B. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi, A. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sukardi. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Widoyoko, E. P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran: Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan Calon Pendidik, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Zhang, G., Zeller, N., Griffith, R., Metcalf, D, Williams, J., Shea C., & Misulis, K. (2011). Using the Context, Input, Process, and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP) as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, Implementation, and Assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15(4), 57-63.