Background: This research, which is the first one of this kind in Kosovo, deals with the use of associative tests in learning biology and in creating concepts, more concretely assessing students’ knowledge on five main human body organs. This study aims to assess the use of free associations for five human body organs and to formulate conceptual sentences in order to assess teacher students’ knowledge on biology and human body.

Material and methods: The research has been conducted with teacher students of third year of studies in the Preschool Education Programme. This research included 25 students, all females. The research took place before the period when students attend the part of the course that covers human biology. The research questionnaire consists of two parts: the first part includes written associations for each human body organ, whereas the second part is formulation of written conceptual sentences for those organs.

Results: The research resulted in 191 associations by respondents, with total frequency of 532 or an average of 4.2 associations per respondent. About half of the associations consisted of the 5 most frequent associations for each of the five organs. In the second part a total of 98 conceptual sentences were formulated with an average frequency of 3.9 sentences per respondent. The formulated sentences were grouped in 3 categories: regular biological sentences, sentences with misunderstandings about certain human body organs, and sentences from everyday life related to human body organs. Number of sentences that included misunderstandings related to the biology of respective human body organs was 18.

Conclusions: The relatively large number of associations for the five body organs was closely linked with the number of correct conceptual sentences written by students and it helps in learning biology more easily. Based on this, use of word associations in creating biological concepts may serve as a good methodological tool of assessment of learning outcomes in the subject of biology and should be promoted to new teachers. The research opens need for similar researches with teacher students of primary education level, but also teacher students` of biology subject in pre-university education system of the Republic of Kosovo.

Anderson, O. R. (1992). Some interrelationships between constructivist models of learning and current neurobiological theory, with implications for science education. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 29, 1037-1058. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660291004

Anglin, J. M. (1977). Word, Object and Conceptual Development. New York: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc. pps. 290.

Bahar, M. (2003). Misconceptions in biology education and conceptual change strategies. Educ. Sci.: Theory Pract., 3, 55-64.

Bahar, M., Ozel, M., Prokop, P., & Usak, M. (2008). Science student teachers’ ideas of the heart. J. Baltic Sci. Educ., 7, 1648-3898.

Bain, A. (1894). Senses and the intellect. London: Longmans, Green & Co.

Bradley, F. H. (1922). The principles of logic. In two volumes. London: Oxford University Press.

Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1996). The mind book: how to use radiant thinking to maximize your brain’s untapped. Plume.

Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development: birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.

Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. (p. 161). In R.J. Sternberg & C.A. Berg (Eds.). Intellectual development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Colgan, A., & McGuinness, C. (1998). Measuring conceptual knowledge organization among student nurses using a word association technique. Nursing Times Research, 3, 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/174498719800300110

Cramer, P. (1968). Word Association. New York: Academic Press.

Davidov, V. V. (Ed.). (1983). Psychological dictionary. Moskwa: Pedagogika [In Russian].

Deese, J. (1966). The structure of associations in language and thought. Oxford: Johns Hopkins Press.

DiCarlo, S. E. (2006). Cell biology should be taught as science is practiced. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 7, 290–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm1856

Dollinger, S. J., Levin, E. L., & Robinson, A. E. (1991). The word association implication test. Journal of Personality Assessment, 57, 368-380. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa5702_14

Field, A. P. (2005). Learning to like (or dislike): associative learning of preferences (p. 221). In A. J. Wills (Ed.), New directions in human associative learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Galton, F. (1880). Psychometric experiments. Brain, 2, 49–162.

Goswami, U. (2001). Analogical reasoning in children (p. 437). In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak & B. Kokinov (Eds.). The analogical mind: perspectives from cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Halford, G. S. (1993). Children’s understanding: the development of mental models. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hinton, G. E., & Anderson, J. A. (1989). Parallel models of human associative memory. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. New York: Henry Holt & Co.

Jordan, K. E., Suanda, S. H., & Brannon, E. M. (July, 2008) Redundancy Accelerates Preverbal Numerical Competence. Cognition, 108(1), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.12.001

Knowlton, B. (1999). What can neuropsychology tell us about category learning? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 123–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01292-9

Kostova, A., & Atasoy, E. (2008). Comparative evaluation of the environmental culture of 8th grade students in Bulgaria and Turkey. BJSEP, 2, 25–47.

Kostova, Z. (1998). How to learn successfully. Sofia: Pedagog 6 [In Bulgarian].

Kostova, Z. (2000). How to create an attitude to learning. Sofia: Pedagog 6 [In Bulgarian].

Kostova, Z. (2008) Word association test for studying conceptual structures of teachers and students. Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy (BJSEP), 2(2), 209-231

Kurt, H. (2013). Biology student teachers’ cognitive structure about “Living thing. African Journal of Medical Education, 1(5), 085-093.

Locke, J. (2000). An essay concerning human understanding. Boston: Elibron Classics. 231

Maki, W. S. (2007). Judgments of associative memory. Cognitive Psychology, 54, 319–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.08.002

Mervis, C. B., & Rosh, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513

Novak, J. D., & Govin, D. B. (1984). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173469

Pascual-Leone, J. (1987). Organismic processes for neo-piagetian theories: a dialectical causal account of cognitive development. International Journal of Psychology, 22, 531–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207598708246795

Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Conditioned reflexes: an investigation pf the psychological activity of the cerebral cortex. London: Oxford University Press.

Rosh, E., & Mervis, C. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 89–113. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513

White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1998). Probing understanding. USA: The Falmer Press.

Wills, A. J. (Ed.). (2005). New directions in human associative learning. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Willshaw, D. (1989). Holography, associative memory and inductive generalization (p. 103). In G. E. Hinton & J. A. Anderson, Parallel models of human associative memory. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Wright, A. (1987) How to Improve Your Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zaller, J. R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691