This paper describes how researchers and teachers have developed ways of embedding the ‘SATELLITES’ geo-science and technology education program into K-12 classrooms, to enhance science teaching and learning. SATELLITES (Students And Teachers Exploring Local Landscapes to Interpret The Earth from Space) is a professional development program aimed at enhancing hands-on science and technology education in a wide range of thematic areas, including Earth and Space Science, Geography, Environmental Science, Biology and Physics. Since the Program’s beginning in 1998, hundreds of teachers have attended intensive summer professional development Institutes in Earth Science and Technology content, project–based learning (PBL), and student inquiry. By leveraging the GLOBE (Global Learning and Observations to Benefit the Environment) Program’s outreach and education resources, thousands of students from across the US and several other countries have participated in SATELLITES. The assessments performed on the efficacy of the program have clearly showed a positive change in teachers’ level and quality of knowledge in geo-technologies and related natural sciences and in students’ engagement in science and comprehension of science concepts. The experience gained throughout the program’s long life has allowed the development and implementation of guidelines and recommendations to address emerging challenges. These experiences, together with the effective overall performance of the program create an important potential to expand its impact, by building capacity in more areas of the country or in other countries, where geospatial technologies have not yet been systematically introduced in the school environment.

Adaktilou, N., Cartalis, C., & Kalkanis, G. (2011). A Learning Platform for the Introduction of Remote Sensing Principles in Higher Education. Dynamic Advancements in Teaching and Learning Based Technologies: New Concepts, pp. 142-161. Pennsylvania, United States: IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-60960-153-9.ch008

American Geophysical Union. (1996). Shaping the future of undergraduate Earth science education: Innovation and change using an Earth system approach. Report of a workshop convened by the American Geophysical Union. November 14-17, 1996. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://www.agu.org/sci_soc/spheres/

American Geoscientists Institute. (2011). Status of the Geoscience Workforce 2011. Report, Preview and Sample. Retrieved from http://www.agiweb.org/workforce/reports/StatusoftheWorkforce2011 overview.pdf

Czajkowski, K. P. (2002, October 15). Using Webcasts for Earth Sciences Classroom Instruction: Lessons Learned, American Geophysical Union’s EOS Weekly Newsletter, pp. 473.

Dib, Z. C. (1988). Formal/non-formal and informal education: concepts/applicability. Published in “Cooperative Networks in Physics Education - Conference Proceedings 173”, American Institute of Physics, New York, 1988, pp. 300-315. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.37526

Digital Agenda for Europe Initiative. (2013). Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/digital-agenda

Donaldson, D. (2000). Public high schools’ ability to support GIS: An Ohio case study. Geographical Bulletin, 41, 91-102.

Donert, K. (2012). A manifesto for Europe: building geospatial capacity (This is a letter from the President of the European Association of Geographers). Retrieved from http://www.eurogeography.eu/digitalearth/geospatial-manifesto-for-europe.pdf

Du Plessis, H., & Van Niekerk, A. (2011). Workforce challenges, needs and expectations. University of Stellenbo. GIS Technical Report. Retrieved from http://eepublishers.co.za/images/upload/posit11/ PositionIT_Oct11_37-40.pdf

EDGIS (1994). First National Conference on the Educational Applications of Geographic Information Systems (EDGIS). Executive summary and recommendations. TERC Communications: Cambridge.

Edutopia. (2008). Why Teach with Project-Based Learning? Providing Students With a Well-Rounded Classroom Experience. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/project-learning-introduction

Fryer, M. (2003). Creativity across the curriculum: A review and analysis of programmes designed to develop creativity. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.

Gaudet, C., Annulis, H., & Carr, J. (2003). Building the geospatial workforce. URISA Journal, 15, 21-30.

Goodchild, M. F. (2006). The Fourth R? Rethinking GIS Education. ArcNews. Fall 2006. Retrieved from http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/fall06articles/the-fourth-r.htm

Hedley, M. L, Czajkowski, K., Benko, T., Landenberger, R., Shellito, Munro-Stasiuk, B. M., & Struble, J. (2008). SATELLITES: A Geospatial Technology Program for Teachers and Students. The Earth Scientist, 27, 11-13.

Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: a path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y

Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2002). Changes in primary boys’ and girls’ attitudes to school and science during a two-year in service programme. The Curriculum Journal, 13, 43-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585170110115268

Kerski, J. J. (2000). The implementation and effectiveness of geographic information systems technology and methods in secondary education (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Colorado, Boulder.

Landenberger, R. E., Warner, T. A., Ensign, T. I., & Nellis, M. D. (2006). Using Remote Sensing and GIS to Teach Inquiry-Based Spatial Thinking: An Example Using Integrated Earth Systems Science Education. Geocarto International, 21, 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106040608542394

Lillesand, T. M., & Kiefer, R. W. (1994). Remote Sensing and Image Interpretation (Third Edition). John Wiley & Sons: New York

Milson, A. J., & Kerski, J. J. (2012). Around the World with Geospatial Technologies. Social Education, 76(2), 105-108. Mar-Apr 2012.

Mondello, C., Hepner, G. F., & Williamson, R. A. (2004). 10-Year industry forecast, Phases I-III, Study documentation. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 7-58.

National Geospatial Advisory Committee. (2012). Geospatial Workforce Development: A compendium of white papers focused on advancing geospatial workforce development. Retrieved from http://www.fgdc.gov/ngac/ngac-geospatial-workforce-development-paper-final.pdf

National Math and Science Initiative (2016). Retrieved from http://www.ncpublicschools.org/docs/charterschools/applications/15-16/mallardapx.pdf

National Research Council. (2011). Successful STEM Education: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press.

National Science Foundation (NSF), National Science Board. (2012). Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. NSB 12-01. Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/pdf/seind12.pdf

Palladino, S. (1994). A role for geographic information systems in the secondary schools: An assessment of the current status and future possibilities (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). University of California, Santa Barbara.

Pew Research Center (2017). Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/15/u-s-students-internationally-math-science/

PISA. (2015). Retrieved from http://www.compareyourcountry.org/pisa/country/USA?lg=en)

Rochelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2001). Changing How and What Children Learn in School with Computer-Based Technologies. The Future of Children, 10, 76-101. https://doi.org/10.2307/1602690

Silvernail, D., & Buffington, P. (2009). Improving mathematics performance using laptop technology: The importance of professional development for success. Maine Education Policy Research Institute. Gorham.

Sturman, L., Rudduck, G., Burge, B., Styles, B., Lin, Y., & Vappula, H., (2008). England’s achievement in TIMSS 2007. Retrieved from http://www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/TMO01/TIMSS2007Executive summary.pdf

The Royal Society. (2008a). Royal Society Science and Mathematics Education: A ‘state of the nation’ report on the participation and attainment of 14-19 year olds in science and mathematics in the UK, 1996-2007. London: The Royal Society. Retrieved from http://www.royalsociety.org/education

The Royal Society. (2008b). Exploring the relationship between socioeconomic status and participation and attainment in science education. London: The Royal Society. Retrieved from http://www.royalsociety.org/education

Torrance, E. P. & Myers, R. E. (1970). Creative Learning and Teaching. Harper & Row: New York.

Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMMS). (2008). TIMSS 2007 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College. Retrieved from http://timss.bc.edu

U.S. Congress Joint Economic Committee Chairman’s Staff. (2012, April). STEM education: Preparing for the jobs of the future. Washington, DC.

U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration. (2005a). Geospatial Technology Apprentice- ship Program. Retrieved on October 1, 2005 from www.doleta.gov/atels_bat/geospatial.cfm

United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA). (2012). Heat Island Effect. Retrieved from http://www.epa.gov/hiri/

US Department of Labor. (2003). Employment and Wages, Annual Averages 2003. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cew/cewbultn03.htm

US Department of Labor. (2007). Employment and Training Administration’s five-year pilot, demonstration and evaluation strategic plan for 2007-2012. Retrieved from http://wdr.doleta.gov/research/FullText_Documents/ETA%20Five-Year%20Research%20Plan.pdf

US National Research Council. (2006). Learning to think spatially. Washington: The National Academies Press.