(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 559-578 | Article Number: ijese.2018.051
Published Online: August 17, 2018
Abstract
This qualitative study investigated how Urban and Rural middle level science teachers and their students understand engineering. Four teachers (two from an Urban school and two from a Rural school) and their respective student populations were examined. Our data included student Views of Nature of Engineering (VNOE) survey, the Draw an Engineer Test (DAET), and teacher and student interviews. The interviews showed all teachers believed there were differences between science and engineering. However, the majority of the teachers did not differentiate between the two subjects in their classrooms. Student interviews showed Urban students, overall, had more ideas of what engineering is than Rural students, and most students (Urban and Rural) tended to distinguish between science and engineering. The VNOE revealed more Urban students than Rural claimed engineering combines all subjects, while more Rural students than Urban described engineering as a subject that involves creating, designing, and inventing. The DAET showed the majority of both Urban and Rural students drew an engineer with an inferred action categorized into the making/fixing/working with hands category. Overall, students and teachers, from both populations, held incomplete understandings of engineers and engineering.
Keywords: qualitative research, middle school, STEM education, teacher knowledge
References
Alon, U. (2003). Biological networks: the tinkerer as an engineer. Science, 301(5641), 1866-1867. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089072
Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in P‐12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369-387. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00985.x
Capobianco, B., & Rupp, M., (2014) STEM Teachers’ Planned and Enacted Attempts at Implementing Engineering Design-Based Instruction.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The Draw‐a‐Scientist Test. Science education, 67(2), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730670213
Davis, M. (1991). Thinking like an engineer: The place of a code of ethics in the practice of a profession. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 150-167.
Engineering is Elementary. (2018). The engineering design process. Retrieved on April 18, 2018 from https://www.eie.org/overview/engineering-design-process
Fralick, B., Kearn, J., Thompson, S., & Lyons, J. (2009). How middle schoolers draw engineers and scientists. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(1), 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9133-3
International Technology Engineering Educators Association (ITEEA) (2007). Standards for technological literacy: content for the study of technology. ITEA Press, Virginia.
Karatas, F., Micklos, A., & Bodner, G. (2011). Sixth-Grade Students’ Views of Engineering and Images of Engineers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(2), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9239-2
Katz, Jonathan. (2009). Engineering Low on Students Radar. Industry Week. Retrieved on January 12, 2018 from http://www.industryweek.com/public-policy/engineering-low-students-radar
Kaya, E., Newley, A., Deniz, H., Yesilyurt, E., & Newley, P. (2017). Introducing engineering design to a science teaching methods course through educational robotics and exploring changes in views of preservice elementary teachers. Journal of College Science Teaching, 47(2) 66-75. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst17_047_02_66
Kentucky Department of Education. (2014). Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress School Report Card. Retrieved on February 9, 2018 from https://education.ky.gov/Pages/default.aspx
Kentucky Department of Education. (2017). Kentucky Performance Rating for Educational Progress School Report Card. Retrieved February 9, 2018, from https://education.ky.gov/Pages/default.aspx
Knight, M., & Cunningham, C. (2004, June). Draw an Engineer Test (DAET): Development of a tool to investigate students’ ideas about engineers and engineering. Paper presented at the annual American Society for Engineering Education Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT.
McCraken, J. D., & Barcinas, J. D. T. (1991). High school and student characteristics in rural and urban areas of Ohio. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 7(2), 29-40.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (2017, July 17). Engineering Design Process. Retrieved from https://www.nasa.gov/audience/foreducators/best/edp.html
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Search for Public Schools. Retrieved on February 13, 2018 from https://nces.ed.gov/
National Research Council (1996). The National Science Education Standards. Washington DC: National Academy Pres.
National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
National Research Council Committee on Theoretical Foundations for Decision Making in Engineering Design. (2001). Theoretical foundations for decision making in engineering design. National Academy Press.
Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, District of Columbia: National Academies Press.
Next Generation Science Standards. (2013). Read the Standards. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org
Nguyen, D. Q. (1998). The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: A comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global J. Of Engng. Educ. 2(1), 65-75.
Pearson Jr, W., & Miller, J. D. (2012). Pathways to an engineering career. Peabody Journal of Education, 87(1), 46-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2012.642270
Smith, K., & Truxal, J. G. (1986). The definition of engineering: Continuing misunderstandings. Change, 18(5), 7.
Suburbanstats. (2018). Current Clark County, Kentucky Population, Demographics and stats in 2017, 2018. Retrieved on May 24, 2018 from https://suburbanstats.org/population/how-many-people-live-in-kentucky
United States Department of Labor. (2015, December 17). 2015 Median Pay. Retrieved on October 01, 2017 from https://www.bls.gov/ooh/architecture-and-engineering/home.htm
Woods, D. R. (1975). Teaching Problem Solving Skills. Engineering Education, 66(3), 238-243.