The purpose of this study was to develop a tool for knowledge transfer of Intangible Cultural Heritage and Intellectual Property in the category of traditional craftsmanship (textile products and Metalwork) in Thailand. This proposed tool was designed with simplicity to ease its use, but with more efficiency when compared to other knowledge transfer tools. This study utilized mixed-method research design, quantitative research was used to collect data from 330 samples, Instrument used for data collection was questionnaires. Qualitative research was conducted in an aspect of in-depth interviews with 20 stakeholders in the creative cultural industries, and acceptance testing of ICHIP application platform. The study found that participants highly satisfied with the reliability of the information that displayed on the platform 93% and the appropriate basic function for the user and the beautiful display feathers are moderate 87%. Data revealed that the ICHIP application platform meets the requirements for ICH and IP information, the user interface was developed to provide a convenient and simple to use.

Anna, T. (2003). Mobile Learning – Review of the Literature. Department of Information and Communication Technology, University of Trento, Italy.

Anuntavoranich, P. (2012) ASEAN Community 2015: Challenges and opportunities of Thai’s culture entrepreneurs. Paper presented at the Pace towards the ASEAN Community Conference, Department of cultural promotion, Bangkok, Thailand.

Bicskei, M., Bizer. K., & Gubaydullina, Z. (2012). Protection of Cultural Goods - Economics of Identity. International Journal of Cultural Property, 19, 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739112000070

Bruno Z., Ilmars S., Atis K., & Armands S. (2006). M-learning and mobile knowledge management: similarities and differences. International Journal of Computing & Information Sciences, 4(2), 58-62.

Cabral, C. B. (2011). Collaborative Internet-mediated ICH inventories. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 6, 36-43.

Caffo, R. (2014). Digital Cultural Heritage Projects: Opportunities and Future Challenges. Procedia Computer Science, 38, 12 – 17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.10.003

Chen, H.-R., & Huang, H.-L. (2010). User Acceptance of Mobile Knowledge Management Learning System: Design and Analysis. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 70–77.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Gonzalez, R. et al. (2015). Social networks in cultural industries. Journal of Business Research, 68, 823–828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.11.035

Ismail, S., & Ahmad, M. S. (2015). Personal Knowledge Management among Managers: Mobile Apps for Collective Decision Making. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 9(1), 42-49.

Kesmanee, C. (2012). A case study of the use of the cultural property and cultural heritage as inappropriate. Office of The National Cultural Commission, 105-138.

Laurentis, C. D. (2006). Digital Knowledge Exploitation: ICT, Memory Institutions and Innovation from Cultural Assets. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31, 77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-005-5014-6

Moore, I. (2014). Cultural and Creative Industries concept – a historical perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 738–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.918

OECD (2005). Culture and Local Development. OECD Publishing, Paris

Park, S. C. (2014). ICHPEDIA, a case study in community engagement in the safeguarding of ICH online. International Journal of Intangible Heritage, 9, 70–82.

Ravi Srinivas, K. R. (2012). Protecting Traditional Knowledge Holders’ Interests and Preventing Misappropriation—Traditional Knowledge Commons and Biocultural Protocols: Necessary but Not Sufficient? International Journal of Cultural Property, 19, 401–422. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0940739112000252

Sudchaya, S. (2007). Research in the field of the protection of Thailand’s traditional knowledge. Department of Intellectual Property, Ministry of Commerce, Bangkok, Thailand.

UNESCO (2007). Statistics on cultural industries Framework for the Elaboration of National Data Capacity Building Projects. UNESCO Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for Education, Bangkok.

Valentina, V. (2015). Innovative valuing of the cultural heritage assets. Economic implication on local employability, small entrepreneurship development, and social inclusion. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 188, 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.334

Zamana, G. (2015). Cultural heritage entrepreneurship (CHE) – challenges and difficulties. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 188, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.333