Although there is discussion of gender equality in science and experimental tasks, it might be different in a non-traditional learning environment, such in an inquiry-based learning arrangement. It’s structure of this teaching method differs from a traditional lesson in that they are perceived as more flexible and have a product as an outcome. The influence of gender, children’s preference in using, and the level of use of digital technology on the outcome will to be analysed in this alternative learning arrangement. 101 primary school children were taught in an inquiry-based learning setting using digital tools to solve an architectural problem. During the experimental phase, the created product was tested in an experiment. The question is whether gender, pupil’s general purpose in using and frequency of technology has an impact on this lesson’s outcome. There was no significant correlation between gender and a successful outcome, but there was a correlation between frequent use of digital tools and a successful achievement in the lesson. There was no significant relationship between gender and the different uses to which technology was put, nor between pupils’ purpose in using it and a successful final outcome in the experiment in an inquiry learning setting. This means that inquiry-based learning, even in a science-based lesson, is suitable for boys and girls equally and frequent use of technology is linked to improved student achievement.

Beck, R. H. (2009). The Three R’s Plus. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.

Bertsch, C., Kapelari, S., & Unterbruner, U. (2014). From cookbook experiments to inquiry based primary science: influence of inquiry based lessons on interest and conceptual understanding. Inquiry in primary science education, 1, 20-31. Retrieved from http://www.science2school.at/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/4-IPSE-Volume-1-No-1-Bertsch_et_al-p-20-32.pdf

Broos, A. (2005). Gender and Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) Anxiety: Male Self-Assurance and Female Hesitation. CyberPsychology & Behaviour, 8(1), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.21

Buchmüller, S., Joost, G., Bessing, N., & Stein, S. (2011). Bridging the gender and generation gap by ICT applying a participatory design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 15(7), 743-758. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-011-0388-y

Cassell, J., & Jenkins, H. (1998). Chess for girls? Feminism and computer games. In J. Cassell & H. Jenkins (Eds.). From Barbie to Mortal Kombat. Gender and Computer Games. (pp. 2-45). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=295058

Cooper, E. T., Bailey, B., & Briggs, K. (2015). Gender Differences in Achievement in an Inquiry-Based Learning Precalculus Course. Mathematics Education, 10(2), 97-110.

Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity. Implications for Organizational competitiveness. Academy of management executive, 5(3), 45–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/4165021

Cronin-Jones, L. L. (1991). Science teacher beliefs and their influence on curriculum implementation: Two case studies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(3), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660280305

Department for Education and Skills. (2017). Gender and education: the evidence on pupils in England. Nottingham: DfES Publications. Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/6616/

Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-Use: A Framework for the Design of Technology-Supported Inquiry Activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736

Edelson, D. C., Gordin, D. N., & Pea, R. D. (1999). Addressing the Challenges of Inquiry-Based Learning Through Technology and curriculum Design. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8(3-4), 391-450. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.1999.9672075

European Commission (2000). A Memorandum on Lifelong Learning. Retrieved from http://arhiv.acs.si/dokumenti/Memorandum_on_Lifelong_Learning.pdf

European Commission. (2009). Women in science and technology - the business perspective. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/pdf/wist_report_final_en.pdf

Geier, R., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Fishman, B., Soloway, E., & Clay-Chambers, J. (2008). Standardized Test Outcomes for Students Engaged in Inquiry-Based Science Curricula in the Context of Urban Reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 922-939. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20248

Gibson, H. L., & Chase, C. (2002). Longitudinal Impact of an Inquiry-Based Science Program on Middle School Student’s Attitudes Toward Science. Science Education, 85(5), 693-705. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10039

Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S. Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2009). Highlights from the Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2007. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009001.pdf

Graham, H., Fuertes, V., Egdell, V., & Raeside, R. (2016). Women in ICT and Digital Technologies: An investigation of the barriers to women entering, staying, and progressing in the sector, and actions to ameliorate this. Retrieved from http://www.napier.ac.uk/~/media/worktribe/output-408031/women-in-ict-and-digital-technologies-executive-summary-251016.pdf

Hakkarainen, K., Ilomäki, L, Lipponen, L. Muukkonen, H., Rahikainen, M., Tuominen, T., Lakkala, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2000). Students’ skills and practices of using ICT: results of a national assessment in Finland. Computers & Education, 32(2), 103-117.

Harlen, W. (2013). Inquiry-based learning in science and mathematics. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 7(2), 9-33. Retrieved from http://ejupunescochair.lis.upatras.gr/index.php/review/article/view/2042

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R.G., & Chinn, C.A. (2007) Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Huff, C., & Cooper, J. (2002). Gender, Software Design, and Occupational Equity. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(2), 112-115. https://doi.org/10.1145/543812.543842

Imhof, M., Vollmeyer, R., & Beierlein, C. (2007). Computer use and gender gap: The issue of access, use, motivation, and performance. Computers in Human Behaviour, 23(6), 2823-2837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.05.007

Initiative D21. (2010). D21-Digital-Index 2015. Die Gesellschaft in der digitalen Transformation. Retrieved from http://initiatived21.de/app/uploads/2017/01/d21_digital-index2015_web2.pdf

International Telecommunications Union. (2016). ICT Facts and Figures 2016. Retrieved from https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/facts/ICTFactsFigures2016.pdf

Juliani, A. J. (2014). Inquiry and Innovation in the Classroom: Using 20% Time, Genius Hour and PBL to Drive Student Success (Eye on Education). New York: Routledge.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2015). Guided Inquiry. Learning in the 21st Century. (2nd ed.) Westport, Conn: Libraries Unlimited. Retrieved from http://wp.comminfo.rutgers.edu/ckuhlthau2/wp-content/uploads/sites/185/2016/02/GIPreface.pdf

Lamoureux, I., Beheshi, J., Cole, C., Abuhimed, D., & AlGhamdi, M. J. (2014). CAIS Paper: Gender Differences in Inquiry-Based Learning: an Exploration of Information Seeking Behaviour of Middle School Students. Retrieved on August 17, 2017 from http://www.cais-acsi.ca/ojs/index.php/cais/article/download/897/817

Laursen, S. L., Hassi, M-L., Kogan, M., & Weston, T. J. (2014). Benefits for Women and Men of Inquiry-Based Learning in College Mathematics: A Multi-Institution Study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(4), 406- 418. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.4.0406

Mehalik, M. M., Doppelt, Y., & Schuun, C.D. (2008). Middle School Science through Design-Based Learning versus Scripted Inquiry: Better Overall Science Concept Learning and Equity Gap Reduction. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(1), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00955.x

Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Gonzalez, E.G., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 international Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

Mullis, I.V.S., Martin, M.O., Kennedy, A.M., & Foy, P. (2007). PIRLS 2006 International Report: IEA’s Progress in International Reading Literacy Study in Primary School in 40 Countries. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.

National Research Council. (1996). The National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

OECD. (2016). Skills in Ibero-America. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/latin-america/Skills-IberoAmerica.pdf

OECD. (2018). PISA 2015. Results in Focus. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf

Osborne, J. F., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199

Ross, V. (2003). The Socratic method: What it is and how to use it in the classroom. Stanford University Newsletter on Teaching, 13(1), 1-4.

Roy, M., & Chi, M. T. (2003). Gender differences in patterns of searching the web. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29(3), 335-348. https://doi.org/10.2190/7BR8-VXA0-07A7-8AVN

Roy, M., Taylor, R., & Chi, M. T. (2003). Searching for information on-line and off-line: gender differences among middle school students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 29, 229–252. https://doi.org/10.2190/KCGA-3197-2V6U-WUTH

Schaumburg, H. (2004). Laptops in der Schule – ein Weg zur Überwindung des Digital Divide zwischen Jungen und Mädchen? (Laptop computers in the classroom – A way to overcome the technological gender gap among students?). Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 16(4), 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1026/1617-6383.16.4.142

Statista. (2017) Berufsperspektive im Vergleich zu anderen Abschlüssen? Retrieved on October 4, 2017 from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/155622/umfrage/meinung-zur-berufsperspektive-der-ingenieure-nach-geschlecht/

UNCTAD. (2014). Empowering Women Entrepreneurs through Information and Communications Technologies. UNCTAD Current Studies on Science, Technology and Innovation. Geneva: United Nations.

UNESCO. (2016). Gender inequality in learning achievement in primary education. What can TERCE tell us? Chile: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002443/244349e.pdf

United Nations Development Fund for Women (2000). Progress of the World’s Women 2000. UNIFEM Biennial Report. New York: Remlitho.

Watson, B., & Konicek, R. (1990). Teaching for Conceptual Change: Confronting Children’s Experience. Phi Delta Kappan, 71(9), 680-685.

WISE campaign. (2017). Woman into Science and Engineering. Retrieved on October 4, 2017 from https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk

Worth, K., Duque, M., & Saltiel, E. (2009). Pollen. Seed Cities for Science. Designing and Implementing Inquiry-Based Science Units for Primary Education. Montrouge: Pollen. Retrieved from http://www.fondation-lamap.org/sites/default/files/upload/media/Guide_Designing%20and%20implementing%20IBSE_final_light.pdf

Wurdinger, S. D. (2016). The power of project-based learning: Helping Students Develop Important Life Skills. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

Young, J. (2002). The 24-hour professor. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 47(38), 31-33.

Zumarova, M. (2015). Computers and children’s leisure time. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 779-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.540