Educating a responsible and ethically sensitive citizen is a challenging task, and pupils should be offered the opportunity to exercise these qualities such as evaluating the ethical issues of nanotechnology. In the European Union, the concept of responsible research and innovation (RRI) was developed to connect both the scientific and industrial processes and their outcomes with the values, needs and expectations of society. RRI helps teachers and pupils engage with scientists, educators, museum workers and the public in doing research and innovations as part of school projects. The aim of the study was to examine how RRI dimensions were understood by Finnish pupils grade five and seven (ages 11-12 and 13-14). The results indicate that the pupils’ ideas about RRI are rather difficult to measure; there was no substantial variation in the pupils’ answers to the RRI questionnaire. Because the results indicated that learning to act in a socially responsible way should not take place only inside a classroom.

Apotheker, J., Blonder, R., Akaygun, S., Reis, P., Kampschulte, L. & Laherto, A. (2017). Responsible Research and Innovation in secondary school science classrooms: experiences from the project Irresistible. Pure and Applied Chemistry, 89(2), 211-219.

Banchi, H. & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and children, 46(2), 26.

Bayram, J. (2015). Responsible research and innovation: What is it? How to integrate in science education. Presented at the International Congress on Education for the Future: Issues and Challenges (ICEFIC 2015) Conference, Ankara University, 13–15 May 2015, Ankara, Turkey.

Blonder, R., Zemler, E. & Rosenfeld, S. (2016). The story of lead: a context for learning about responsible research and innovation (RRI) in the chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 1145-1155.

Blonder, R., Rap, S., Zemler, E. & Rosenfeld, S. (2017). Assessing Attitudes about Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI): The Development and Use of a Questionnaire. Sisyphus-Journal of Education, 5(3), 122-156.

Braund, M. & Reiss, M. (2006). Towards a more authentic science curriculum: The contribution of out‐of‐school learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(12), 1373–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500498419

Douglas, C. & Stemerding, D. (2013). Governing synthetic biology for global health through responsible research and innovation. Systems and Synthetic Biology, 7(3), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11693-013-9119-1

Van Driel, J., Beijaard, D. & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of research in science teaching, 38(2), 137-158.

European Commission. (2014). “Responsible research and innovation – Europe’s ability to respond to societal challenges”. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/p-ub_rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf

European Union (EU). (2017). Horizon 2020. Responsible research and innovation. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation#Article

Eurobarometer. (2013). Responsible research and innovation (RRI), Science and Technology. Special Eurobarometer 401. European Union.

Finnish National Board of Education (2014). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014 (in Finnish). Retrieved from: http://www.oph.fi/download/163777_perusopetuksen_opetussu-unnitelman_perusteet_2014.pdf

Gardiner, S. (2011). Some early ethics of geoengineering the climate: A commentary on the values of the Royal Society report. Environmental Values, 20(2), 163–188.

Irresistible project. (2017). Engaging the youth with responsible research and innovation. Retrieved from: http://www.irresistible-project.eu/index.php/en

Jacob. K. (2013). Options for strengthening responsible research and innovation. Belgium: European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/46253

Lederman, N. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–879). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

Lederman, N., Antink, A. & Bartos, S. (2014). Nature of science, scientific inquiry, and socio-scientific issues arising from genetics: A pathway to developing a scientifically literate citizenry. Science & Education, 1, 1-18.

Mercer, N., Dawes, L., Wegerif, R. & Sams, C. (2004). Reasoning as a scientist: Ways of helping children to use language to learn science. British Educational Research Journal, 30(3), 359–377.

Michaels, S., O’Connor, C. & Resnick, L. (2008). Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27(4), 283–297.

Owen, R., Macnaghten, P. & Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and Public Policy, 39(6), 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093

Ratinen, I. Viiri, J. & Lehesvuori, S. (2013). Primary School Student Teachers’ Understanding of Climate Change: Comparing the Results Given by Concept Maps and Communication Analysis. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1801-1823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9329-7

Ratinen, I. Kähkönen, A-L., Lindell. A. & De Vocht, M. (2016). In Silfverberg, H. & Hästö, P. (Eds.): Annual symposium of the Finnish mathematics and science education research association 2015. Does RRI focused science teaching help students incorporate RRI into their Inquiry-based lesson plans? Retrieved from: http://www.protsv.fi/mlseura/julkaisut/MALU-2015_Final.pdf

Ratinen, I. (2016). Primary student teachers’ climate change conceptualization and implementation on inquiry-based and communicative science teaching. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.

Ruggiu, D. (2015). Anchoring European governance: Two versions of Responsible Research and Innovation and EU fundamental rights as “normative anchor points.” Nanoethics, 9, 217–235.

Sadler, T. (2011). Socio-scientific issues-based education: What we know about science education in the context of SSI. In Sadler T.D. (Eds.), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom (pp. 355–369). Springer Netherlands.

Stahl, B. (2011). IT for a better future. How to integrate ethics, politics and innovation. In R. von Schomberg (Eds.), Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. London: European Commission.

Stilgoe, J., Owen, R. & Macnaghten, P. (2013). Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008

Sutcliffe, H. (2011). A report on Responsible Research and Innovation for the European Commission. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/sciencesociety/document_library/pdf_06/rri-report-hilary-sutcliffe_en.pdf

Sweeney, A., Seal, S. & Vaidyanathan, P. (2003). The promises and perils of nanoscience and nanotechnology: Exploring emerging social and ethical issues. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(4), 236–245.

Wegerif, R., Fujita, T., Doney, J., Linares, J., Richards, A. & Van Rhyn, C. (2017). Developing and trialing a measure of group thinking. Learning and Instruction, 48, 40–50.