This study aims to determine the perceptions of teachers and pre-service teachers about 4+4+4 education systemvia the metaphors they have developed.In this study, the opinions of teachers and pre-service teachers are described with qualitative approach. The participants of the study are 137 primary school 1st grade teachers, working in Mugla in 2012-2013 academic year, and 116 4th grade students, studying at Primary School Teaching Department in the Faculty of Education in MuglaSıtkıKocman University. In the data collection process, teachers and pre-service teachers were required to complete this sentence: “When the characteristics of 4+4+4 are considered, 4+4+4 education system is like …………, because …………..”. In the analysis of the data, content analysis tecnique, one of the qualitative analysis methods, was applied. The perceptions of teachers were separated into 9 categories according to the metaphors teachers and pre-service teachers created about 4+4+4 education system and both the statements mostly used by teachers and pre-service teachers are provided for these categories. These categories are “a continuously changing structure; a system all of whose parts have deficiencies; an application without any preparation and infrastructure work; uncertainty and complication; an application whose future is dark; a useless and inappropriate system; a forcing and imposing application; a graded and systematical structure (positive); meaningless(cannot resemble anything).

Arnett, R.C.(1999). Metaphorical guidance: Administration as building and renovation. Journal of Educational Administration, 37(1), 80-89.

Aydın, I.S.,Pehlivan, A.(2010). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmen ve öğrenci kavramlarına ilişkin kullandıkları metaforlar.[The metaphors that turkish teacher candidates use concerning "teacher" and "student" concepts]. Turkish Studies,5 (3), 818-842.

Aykac, N.,Celik O.(2014). Öğretmenlerin ve öğretmen adaylarının eğitim programına ilişkin metaforik algılarının karşılaştırılması. [Comparison of metaphoric perception of teachers and pre-service teachers about curriculum]. Education and Science,39(173), 328-340.

Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education, 29(4), 431-444.

Boyacı, A.(2009). İlköğretim okulu öğretmenlerinin eğitim planlaması süreçlerine yönelik kullandıkları metaforlar. [Metaphorical images for educational planning: percetions of publicelemantary school teachers]. Selcuk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 21, 111-124.

Cerit, Y.(2008). Öğrenci, öğretmen ve yöneticilerin müdür kavramı ile ilgili metaforlara ilişkin görüşleri. [Students, teachers and administrators' views on metaphors with respectto the concept of principal]. Education and Science, 33 (147), 3-13.

Celikten, M.(2006).Kültür ve öğretmen metaforları. [Culture and teacher metaphors used in educational system.] Erciyes University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 21, 269-283.

Forceville, C.(2002). The identification of target and source in pictorial metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1-14.

Holman, C.(1985). A handbook to literature. Indianapolis: ITT Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing Company.

Güven, I. (2012). Eğitimde 4+4+4 ve faith projesi yasa tasarısı = reform mu?[The 4+4+4 school reform bill and the fatih project: is it a reform?]. Elementary Education Online,11(3), 556-577.

Inbar, D. (1996). The free educational prison: Metaphors and images. Educational Research, 38 (1), 77–92.

Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lakoff, G., Johson, M.(2003).Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M.(2005).Metaforlar hayat, anlam ve dil.[Metaphors we live by].(GY Demir, Trans.). İstanbul: Paradigma Publishing.

Levine, P.M.(2005). Metaphors and images of classrooms. Kappa Delta Pi Record, 41 (4), 172-175.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Saban, A.(2009). Öğretmen adaylarının öğrenci kavramına ilişkin sahip oldukları zihinsel imgeler. [Mental images teacher candiates have about the concept of student.]  Turkish Educational Sciences Journal, 7(2), 281-326.

Schon, D.A. (1993). Generative metaphor: a perspective on problem-setting in social policy, in A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and Thought, (pp. 137-163). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Steen, G. J.(2007). Finding metaphor in grammar and usage. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Tasdemir, M., Tasdemir, A. (2011). Ilköğretim programı üzerine öğretmen metaforları. [Teachers' metaphors about primary education curriculum.] 2nd International Conference onNew Trends in Education and Their Implications, (p. 795-809). Antalya.

Teddlie, C., Yu, F. (2007).Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research,1(77): 77-100.

Thomas L., Beauchamp, C.(2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education,27, 762-769.

Yıldırım, A., Simsek, H.(2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri.[Qualitative Research Mehtods in Social Studies.] Ankara: Seckin Publishing.