(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 2073-2087 | Article Number: ijese.2017.139
Published Online: November 14, 2017
Abstract
This study aimed at explaining and identifying desirability indictors and components of educational space of multi-grade classes comparing current situation of educational space of these classes with desirable indicators; for this purpose, the combined approach- qualitative with exploratory type and quantitative with descriptive-analytical type- was used. Statistical population of study consisted of experts and teachers of multi-grade classes in prosperous and Non-prosperous provinces; these members were selected using purposeful sampling method. Semi-structured interview was used as research instrument in qualitative part and current situation was observed in descriptive-analytical method based on indicators and components of educational space of multi-grade classes. Coding and categorizing applied to analyze data obtained from interviews. To determine reliability of data, extracted categories were given to interviewees. Findings indicated that desirability components of educational space in multi-grade classes consisted of color, light, audio pacification, ventilation, classroom arrangement, area, auxiliary facilities, cooling, heating, computer and instructional materials. Moreover, findings showed that multi-grade classes in prosperous provinces was at optimal level in terms of color, light, audio pacification, ventilation, heating, and computer facilities while this criterion was at average level in terms of classroom arrangement, area, auxiliary facilities, cooling, and instructional materials. Multigrade classes in non-prosperous provinces were optimal in terms of light and ventilation while at lower than average level in terms of other indicators.
Keywords: Desirability Indicators and Components, Multi-grade Classes Comparing, Educational space, Desirable Indicators, Prosperous and Nonprosperous Provinces
References
Amir Teymouri, M. H. (2014). Designing educational messages, Tehran, Samt Pub.
Azzi, V., Catharine, D., Roberto, J.,. (2007). An evaluation method for school building design at the preliminary phase with optimization of aspects of environmental comfort for the school system of the State São Paulo in Brazil. Building and Environment, 42(2), 984- 999.
Bakhtiari Nasrabadi, H. A. (2001). Comparative study of the physical condition of schools in Isfahan city with the standards of the organization for the renovation, development and equipping of schools, Isfahan, Research Council of the Directorate General Education of the province.
Bangkok, U. (2013). Practical tips for teaching multigrade classes. Bangkok: Unesco.
Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., & Valentine, J. C. (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis: Russell Sage Foundation.
Coskun, K., Metin, M., Bülbül, K., & Yılmaz, G. K. (2011). A study on developing an attitude scale towards multi-grade classrooms for elementary school teachers. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2733-2737.
Daneshmehr, Z. (1998). Analysis of zoning system of educational spaces distribution in East Azarbaijan province, Tabriz, Education Organization of East Azarbaijan.
Darmody, M., Smyth, E., & Doherty, C. (2010). Designing primary schools for the future. Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI) Research Series.dublin: The economic and social research institute.
Fathi Vaharkhah, K. (2015). Principles and concepts of curriculum planning, Tehran, Teachers' Science Publication.
Farahbod, M., Gharib, M. (2014). Study of educational space, the need for disabled children to enter ordinary. schools Journal of Educational Innovations. 15 (4), 23-41.
Ghazizadeh, B. (1994). Principles and criteria for the design of educational spaces, Tehran, Office of Research of the Organization for the Modernization, Development and equipping of schools in Iran, Tehran, Sefid Press.
Kamel, S. A. E. R. (2012). Multigrade education: Application and teacher preparation in Egypt. American Universityin Cairo.
Karimi, J. (2008). An analysis of the present and desirable condition of Fars Schools' facilities based on the indicators of the Second Development Plan, unpublished MA thesis, Isfahan, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Isfahan.
Golmohammadi, R. (2005). Investigating sound pollution in schools and ways to remove it, Tehran, Organization for the Renovation and Equipping of Schools.
Ibrahimi Dastgerdi, A. (1997). Investigating the design of educational spaces of the new high school system in Isfahan Province, unpublished MA thesis, University of Khorasgan, Isfahan.
Iranian Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research University of Tehran, (2008). Applied scientific and technical researches in educational spaces. Tehran, Organization of the Renovation, Development and Equipping of Schools in Iran.
Little, A. W. (2001). Multigrade teaching: Towards an international research and policy agenda. International Journal of Educational Development, 21(6), 481-497.
Mason, D. A., & Stimson, J. (1996). Combination and nongraded classes: Definitions and frequency in twelve states. The Elementary School journal, 96(4), 439-452.
Mathot, G. B. (2001). Instruction for teachers of multi-grade classes, Ali Zarafshan Trans, Tehran, School Publication.
Mirzaee, R. (1997). Discussion about standards for educational equipment. New School Journal, 3 (6), 7-11.
Molaee, S. (2005). Comparative study of the physical condition of Tabriz primary schools with the country's standards, MA thesis, Tabriz University.
Mortazavizadeh, S. H. (2015). Management and planning in multipage classes, Tehran, Kourosh Pub. Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2007). The preparation of teachers for multigrade teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(4), 501-514.
Navidadehm, M. (1994). School message, Tehran, School Publication
Nawab, A., & Baig, S. R. (2011). The possibilities and challenges of multigrade teaching in rural Pakistan. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(15).
Organization of the renovation, development and equipping of schools in Iran. (2007). Criteria for educational spaces, Tehran, Moalef pub.
Pridmore, P., Thomas, L., Havemann, K., Sapag, J., & Wood, L. (2007). Social capital and healthy urbanization in a globalized world. Journal of Urban Health, 84(1), 130-143.
Shateiran, R. (2014). Design and architecture of educational spaces, Tehran, Simay Danesh Pub.
Shabani, H. (2011). Educational skills, Tehran, Samt Pub.
Taavoni, Sh., Asefi, N. (1996). Standards for library instruments, equipment and information centers, Tehran, Moalef Pub.
Tabaean, M., Habib, F., Abedi, A. (2011). The viewpoint of desired and undesired high school students about the color of educational space and methods to improve the quality of the educational space. Journal of Educational Innovations, 38 (10), 93-106.
Unesco, E. (2007). EFA global monitoring report 2008: Paris: UNESCO Publishing, Oxford University Press.
Veenman, S. (1995). Cognitive and noncognitive effects of multigrade and multi-age classes: A best.
Zamani, B. E., Nasr Esfahani, A. R. (2007). Physical and cultural features of the educational spaces of the four advanced countries of the world from the perspective of Iranian students and their parents. Educational Innovations, 23 (4), 55-84.
Yazdanpanah, Gh. (1994). Studying the status of educational spaces in elementary schools of Mazandaran, unpublished MA thesis, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran, Faculty of Educational Sciences.