Development of CIPP Model of Evaluation Instrument on the Implementation of Project Assessment in Science Learning

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Asfaroh, Rosana & Supahar, 2017)
Your Bibliography: Asfaroh, J.A., Rosana, D. & Supahar, (2017). Development of CIPP Model of Evaluation Instrument on the Implementation of Project Assessment in Science Learning . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(9), 1999-2010.

Harvard
In-text: (Asfaroh, Rosana and Supahar, 2017)
Your Bibliography: Asfaroh, J., Rosana, D. and Supahar, (2017). Development of CIPP Model of Evaluation Instrument on the Implementation of Project Assessment in Science Learning . International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(9), pp. 1999-2010.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Asfaroh, Rosana and Supahar 2017)
Your Bibliography: Asfaroh, Jati Aurum, Dadan Rosana and Supahar (2017). "Development of CIPP Model of Evaluation Instrument on the Implementation of Project Assessment in Science Learning ". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 12 (9):1999-2010.

Abstract

The aim of this study to develop an instrument of evaluation constructed by CIPP model on the implementation of performance assessment in science learning. This study used research and development (R & D) method; adapting 4D Model modified by the development of non test instrument. The subject of this developing study were 8th grade students and science teachers of Junior High School in Yogyakarta. Validity test is done by the content, construct, and language; its analyzed by using V’Aiken formula. Reliability testing is done by Inter Class Correlation (ICC) technique. The validity results indicates that the instrument as a valid. The V’Aiken coefficient ranged from 0,86 to 1,00. The alpha reliability coefficient for observation sheet is 0,923 and questioner is 0,916, its categorized reliable. The result shows that an evaluation instrument constructed by CIPP model categorized not only as valid in content, construction, and language, but also reliable. The instrument of evaluation used to evaluate the implementation of project assessment and the result show that the implementation of project assessment in Junior High School in Yogyakarta categorized as a good.

Keywords: Evaluation instrument, CIPP model, Project Assessment.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three Coefficients for Analyzing The Reliability and Validity of Ratings. Educational and Physological Measurement, 45, 131 dan 134

Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of the inquiry-based project implemetation process i science education student point of view. Intrnational Journal Of Instruction, 1-12.

Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

BSNP. (2010). Laporan BSNP;Pengembangan paradigma pendidikan nasional abad XXI.

Callison, d. (1998). Authentıc Assessment.Scholl Library Media Activities Monthly 14 no 5. Dipetik Maret 01, 2017, dari http://www.ala.org/aasl/sites/ala.org.aasl/files/content/aaslpubsandjournals/slr/edchoice/SLMQ AuthenticAssessment InfoPower.pdf.

Crunkilton, C. (1978). Curriculum development in Vocational and Technical Education. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc.

Gliem, J. A & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Intepreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.

Guili, N. Z. (2011). Using The Context, Imput, process and Product Evaluation Model (CIPP)as a Comprehensive Framework to Guide the Planning, aimplemetation, and assessment of Service-learning Programs. Journal of Higher Educational outreach and Engangement, Volume 15 Number 4, 57.

Hamid, D. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research, -, 382.

Oliva, P. (1992). Developing The Curiculum Third Edition. New York: Harper Collins. .

Patil, Y., & Kalekar, S. (2015). Cipp model for school evaluation. June-July, 2(10), 2615–2619. Retrieved from www.srjis.com

Phattharayuttawat, S. (2009). An evaluation of the curriculum of a graduate programme in Clinical Psychology. South East Asian Jouranl of Medical Education, 3(1), 14–19. Retrieved from http://seajme.md.chula.ac.th/articleVol3No1/OR2_Sucheera Phattharayuttawat.pdf

Republik Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Mentei Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Pendidikan

Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Mentei Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Pendidikan.

Rusilowati, Ani. (2013). Pengembangan Instrumen Nontes. SNEP Tahun 2013 ISBN 978-602-14215-0-5. Diakses pada tanggal 14 Oktober 2016, dari http://conf.unnes.ac.id/index.php/snep/I/paper/viewFile/7/2.

Safruddin, S. A. (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Sterling, D. (2005). Assessing Understanding. Journal Science Scope, Vol. 28 N4 p.33-37.

Stufflebeam, D. (1985). Systematic Evaluation "A Self-Intruction Guide to Theory and Practice". Hingham Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Sukmasari, V. P. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Project Assesment Untuk Mnegukur Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah. Yogyakarta.

TenBrink, T. D. (1974). Evaluation A Practical Guide for Teacher. Columbia: McGraw-Hill.

Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, Semmel, Dorothy S., Semmel, Melvyn I. (1975). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University.

Treagust, David F. (2006). Diagnostic assessment in science as a means to improving teaching, learning and retention 2006 Australian Conferece on Science and Mathematics EducationSydney. UniServe Science Conference. Sydney.

Wismath, S., Orr, D., & Zhong, M. (2014). Student perception of problem solving skills. Teaching & Learning Journal, 7(3),1-17.

Wiyarsi, A. (2011). Penilaian Proyek sebagai Implementasi Authentic Assessment untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir dan Kerja Ilmiah mahasiswa. Dari :http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/132312678/makalah%20 authentic%20assessment.pdf diakses pada tanggal 20 Oktober 2016.

Yahaya, A. H. (2001). The using of Model Context, Input, Process and Products (CIPP in :earning Programs Assessment). Inrenational Conference on Challenges and Prospects in Teacher Education (hal. 1). Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.