(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 1989-1998 | Article Number: ijese.2017.131
Published Online: November 14, 2017
Abstract
Тhe aim of this study is to develop an instrument of evaluation constructed using the CIPP model in the implementation of portfolio in science learning. Тхис study used research and development (R&D) method, adapting 4-D development model integrated with the development of non-test instruments. The subjects of this study were science teachers and 8th grade students of Junior High School in Yogyakarta. The validity test was analyzed by using V'aikens formula. Reliability is analyzed by using Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) technique.Тhe results of this study shows the instrument is valid. The Aiken’s V coefficient ranged from 0.900 to 1.00. The Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient is above 0.800 so the instrument is considered reliable. The practicality was obtained in a very practical category.Тhe instrument of evaluation used to evaluate the implementation of portfolio assessment and the results shows that the implementation of portfolio assessment in Junior High Schools in Yogyakarta is in a good category.
Keywords: evaluation instrument, CIPP model, portfolio assessment
References
Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three Coefficiens for Analyzing the Reliability and Validity of Rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45, 131-145
Ali, I. (2014). Prospective Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Use of Portfolio. Journal of Education and Practice, 5, 17-24
Arikunto, S. & Jabar (2014). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara Bailin, S. (2002). Critical Thinking and Science Education. Science & Education, 11, 361-375
Bailin, S. (2002). Critical Thinking and Science Education. Science & Education, 11, 361-375.
Esmiyati. (2016). Pengembangan Penilaian Portofolio dalam Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Masalah untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Tema Tekanan. Tesis master, tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Gliem, J. A & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, Intepreting, and Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient for Likert-Type Scales. Midwest Research to Practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and Community Education.
Huei-Mei Wei, Lung-Hsing Kuo, Hsueh-Chih Lin, & Hung-Jeng Yang. (2000). Evaluating Innovation by CIPP Model. Recent Advances in Communication, Circuit, and Technological Innovation. National Kaohsiung Normal University
Kaur, C. & Samad, A.A. (2013). The Use of Portfolio as an Assessment Tool in the Malaysian L2 Classroom. International Journal of English Language Education, 1, 94-108
Kurnia, F., Rosana, D., Supahar. (2017). Developing evaluation instrument based on CIPP Models on the Implementation of Portfolio Assessment. AIP Conference Proceedings 1868, 080003 (2017); doi: 10.1063/1.4995187
Lynn, M. R. (1985). Determination and Quantification of Content Validity. Nursing Research, -, 382.
Mardapi, D. (2008) Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Nontes. Yogyakarta:
Mohebbi, N., Akhlaghi, F., Yarmohammadian, M. H., & Khoshgam, M. (2011). Application of CIPP model for evaluating the medical records education course at master of science level at Iranian medical sciences universities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3286–3290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.287
Msila, V., & Setlhako, A. (2013). Evaluation of Programs: Reading Carol H. Weiss. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 1(4), 323–327. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2013.010408
Pantiwati, Yuni. (2013). Authentic Assessment for Improving Cognitive Skill, Critical0Creative Thinking and Meta-Cognitive Awareness. Journal of Education and Practive. Vol. 4 No. 14. ISSN 2222-1735
Rakayani, N.K.T.S., Asri, I.G.A.A.S., & Suara, I.M. (2015). Pengaruh Pendekatan Saintifik Berbasis Asesmen Portofolio terhadap Hasil Belajar Pkn Ditinjau dari Kecenderungan Bernalar pada Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 2 Ubung Kecamatan Denpasar Utara. E-Journal PGSD niversitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 3, 1-10.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar oleh Pendidik pada Pendidikan Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 tentang Standar Pendidikan.
Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D.S. & Semmel, M.I. 1974. Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington.
Warju. (2016). Educational Program Evaluation using CIPP Model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education. Invotec XII:1, 36-42
Wiggins, Grant. (1990). The Case for Authentic Assessment. Practical Assessment, Reseacrh & Evaluation, 2(2)
Wilujeng, I., Setiawan, A., & Liliasari. (2010). Kompetensi IPA Terintegrasi melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Mahasiswa S-1 Pendidikan IPA. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 3, 353-364.
Zhang, S. (2009). Has Portfolio Assessment Become Common Practice in EFL Classrooms? Empirical Studies from China. English Language Teaching, 2, 99-118.