Comparison of Male and Female Primary School Student Reasoning Profiles in Solving Fractional Problems

APA 6th edition
In-text: (Holisin, Budayasa & Suwarsono, 2017)
Your Bibliography: Holisin, I., Budayasa, I.K. & Suwarsono, S. (2017). Comparison of Male and Female Primary School Student Reasoning Profiles in Solving Fractional Problems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(6), 1553-1565.

Harvard
In-text: (Holisin, Budayasa and Suwarsono, 2017)
Your Bibliography: Holisin, I., Budayasa, I. and Suwarsono, S. (2017). Comparison of Male and Female Primary School Student Reasoning Profiles in Solving Fractional Problems. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 12(6), pp. 1553-1565.

Chicago 16th edition
In-text: (Holisin, Budayasa and Suwarsono 2017)
Your Bibliography: Holisin, Iis, I Ketut Budayasa and St. Suwarsono (2017). "Comparison of Male and Female Primary School Student Reasoning Profiles in Solving Fractional Problems". International Journal of Environmental and Science Education 12 (6):1553-1565.

Abstract

This study aims to describe the comparison of students male and female primary school students reasoning problems in solving fractional problems. This research includes explorative research with qualitative approach which reveal the symptoms that occur in the subject of research. The results of the study showed that female students in solving the problem of fractions presented the mathematical statement orally by looking at the word or phrase that existed on the problem, connecting the facts in Known problems with the questions asked; Create a solution plan by looking at the key words in the problem; Complete the multiplication of fractions by the technique of crossing out and using the formula; Re-examine the results of the solution by doing mental calculations, rework the problem in the same way. Students believe the result is correct because the result must be the same, there is no other way. A male student in solving a fractional problem presents an oral mathematical statement by looking at the word or phrase that exists in the problem, linking the facts in the problem of what is known to the question; Make a plan of solution by paying full attention to the meaning of the sentence, by experimenting in order that the results are not negative; Complete the multiplication of fractions by the technique of crossing out and using the formula; Re-examine the results by doing mental calculations, recalculating.

Keywords: Fractional Problems, Reasoning, Elementary School Students

References

Artzt, Alice F. and Yaloz-Femia, Shirel. (1999). “Mathematical reasoning during small-group problem solving”. In Lee V. Stiff and Frances R. Curcio (Ed). Developing mathematical reasoning in grades K-12, 115-126. Reston, Virginia:National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Bancong, H., Subaer. (2013). “Profil penalaran logis berdasarkan gaya berpikir dalam memecahkan masalah fisika peserta didik“. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia. JPII 2 (2) (2013) 195-202

Chaplin, J.P. (1989). Kamus lengkap psikologi (terjemahan Kartini Kartono). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Depdiknas. Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Balai Pustaka.

Depdiknas. (2002). Kurikulum berbasis kompetensi mata pelajaran matematika. Jakarta: Pusat Kurikulum-Balitbang.

Depdiknas. (2006). Standar kompetensi dan kompetensi dasar. Jakarta:Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan.

Hudojo, Herman. (1979). Pengembangan kurikulum matematika dan pelaksanaannya di depan kelas. Surabaya : Usaha Nasional.

Jensen, Eric. (2011). Pemelajaran berbasis otak paradigma pengajaran baru. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta:PT Indeks.

Kamus Bahasa Indonesia Online. http://kamusbahasaindonesia.org/mampu. Diakses tanggal 15 Okteober 2014.

Kariadinata, R. (2012). ”Menumbuhkan daya nalar (power of reason) siswa melalui pembelajaran analogi matematika”. Jurnal Ilmiah Program Studi Matematika STKIP Siliwangi Bandung Vol. 1 No.1

Keraf, G. (1982). Argumen dan narasi. Komposisi lanjutan III. Jakarta:Gramedia.

Krulik, Stephen & Rudnick, Jesse A. (1995). The new sourcebook for teaching reasoning and problem solving in Elementary School. Boston:Allyn and Bacon.

Mueller,Mary & Maher,Carolyn. (2009). “Learning to reason in an informal math after-school program”. Mathematics Education Research Journal Vol. 21, No. 3, 7-35

Pape, Stepen J. (2004). “Middle School children’s problem-solving Behavior: a Cognitive Analysis from a reading comprehension perspective”. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education Vol. 35, No. 3, 187-219.

Polya. (1973). How to solve it. Princetown, NJ: Princetown University Press.

Robbins, Stephen P.; Judge, Timothy A. (2008). Perilaku organisasi buku 1, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.

Royer, James M. dan Garofoli,Laura M. (2005). Cognitive contributions to sex differences in math performance. in gender defferences in mathematics an integrative psychological approach. Cambridge University Press.

Santrock, John W. (2003). Adolescense perkembangan remaja. Edisi Keenam. Alih Bahasa: Dra. Shinto B. Adelar, M.Sc. Jakarta:Erlangga.

Sasongko, Sri Sundari. (2009). Konsep dan teori gender. Pusat Pelatihan Gender dan Peningkatan Kualitas Perempuan, BKKBN.

Shadiq, F. (2004). Pemecahan masalah, penalaran, dan komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Depdiknas, dirjendikdasmen PPPG Matematika.

Shadiq, F. (2007). Penalaran atau reasoning, mengapa perlu dipelajari di sekolah. https://fadjarp3g.files.wordpress.com/2007/09/okpenalaran_gerbang_pdf.

Shadiq, F. (2009). Kemahiran matematika. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Dirjen Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan Depdiknas.

Siswono, Tatag Yuli Eko. (2008). Model pembelajaran matematika berbasis pengajuan dan pemecahan masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Surabaya:Unesa University Press.

Solso. (1995). Cognitive psychology. Boston : Allyn and Bacon.

Subanji. (2007). Proses berpikir pseudo penalaran kovariasional dalam mengkonstruksi grafik fungsi kejadian dinamik berkebalikan. (Disertasi doktor tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Sukayasa. (2011). Karakteristik penalaran siswa SMP dalam memecahkan masalah geometri ditinjau dari perbedaan gender. (Disertasi doktor tidak dipublikasikan). Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Sumarmo, Utari. (1987).Kemampuanpemahamandan penalaranmatematika siswa SMA dikaitkandengan kemampuan penalaranlogic siswadanbeberapaunsur proses belajar mengajar.(Disertasi doktor tidak dipublikasikan). FPS IKIP Bandung.

Suriasumantri, Jujun S. (1988). Filsafat ilmu sebuah pengantar populer. Jakarta:Pustaka Sinar Harapan.

Yankelewitz, Dina. (2009). The development of mathematical reasoning in Elementary School students’ exploration of fraction ideas. A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School of Education Rutgers. The State University of New Jersey in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Education Graduate Program in Mathematics Education. http://mss3.libraries.rutgers.edu/dlr/TMP/rutgers-lib_28410-PDF-1.pdf.

Zhu, Zheng. (2007). “Gender differences in mathematical problem solving patterns: A review of literature”. International Education Journal, 8(2), 187-203