(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 1459-1481 | Article Number: ijese.2017.094
Published Online: August 11, 2017
Abstract
Citizen science seems to have a natural alignment with environmental and science education, but incorporating citizen science projects into education practices is still a challenge for educators from different education contexts. Based on participant observation and interview data, this paper describes the strategies educators identified for implementing an environmental citizen science project in different education contexts (i.e., classroom teaching, aquarium exhibits, and summer camp) and discusses the practical concerns influencing independent implementation by educators. The results revealed different implementation strategies that are shaped by four categories of constraints: 1) organizational and institutional policies, 2) educators’ time and material resources, 3) learners’ needs and abilities, and 4) aspects of citizen science project design that constitute a higher barrier to entry for educators managing student contributions. We developed a simple two-dimensional model to demonstrate the types of adaptations that educators made to citizen science projects and discussed the potential role of persuasive technologies to address some of the gaps and better facilitate educator and learner participation.
Keywords: Citizen science; science educators; formal and non-formal education; practical concerns, implementation strategies
References
Ballard, H. L., Dixon, C. G., & Harris, E. M. (2017). Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation. Biological Conservation, 208, 65-75.
Berkowitz A. R. (1997). A simple framework for considering the benefits of SSPs. National Conference on Student and Scientist Partnerships: Conference Report. Cambridge, MA: TERC. pp. 38–41.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27(9), 1099-1121.
Butler, D. M., & MacGregor, I. D. (2003). GLOBE: Science and education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 51(1), 9-20.
Cohn, J. P. (2008). Citizen science: Can volunteers do real research?. AIBS Bulletin, 58(3), 192-197.
Crowston, K. (2000). Process as theory in information systems research. In Organizational and social perspectives on information technology (pp. 149-164). Springer US.
Dickinson, J. L., Zuckerberg, B., & Bonter, D. N. (2010). Citizen science as an ecological research tool: challenges and benefits. Annual review of ecology, evolution, and systematics, 41, 149-172.
Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
Eshach, H. (2007). Bridging in-school and out-of-school learning: Formal, non-formal, and informal education. Journal of science education and technology, 16(2), 171-190.
Fogg, B. J. (2002). Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity, 5.
Gray, S. A., Nicosia, K., & Jordan, R. C. (2012). Lessons learned from citizen science in the classroom. a response to" the future of citizen science." Democracy and Education, 20(2), 14.
Houseal, A. K., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Destefano, L. (2014). Impact of a student–teacher–scientist partnership on students' and teachers' content knowledge, attitudes toward science, and pedagogical practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(1), 84-115.
Jordan, R. C., Gray, S. A., Howe, D. V., Brooks, W. R., & Ehrenfeld, J. G. (2011). Knowledge gain and behavioral change in citizen science programs. Conservation Biology, 25(6), 1148-1154.
Kelling, S., Johnston, A., Hochachka, W. M., Iliff, M., Fink, D., Gerbracht, J., ... & Wong, W. K. (2015). Can observation skills of citizen scientists be estimated using species accumulation curves?. PloS one, 10(10), e0139600.
Loarie, S. (2016). What is it. Retrieved from http://www.inaturalist.org/pages/what_is_it
Lostal, E., Serrano, F., Carrodeguas, J. A., Martínez, P., Sanz, F. & Val, C. (2013). A case of Citizen Science for Cell Biology Images Analysis. In: Proceedings of the XXXIII Congresso da Sociedade Brasileira de Computação (CSBC 2013). Maceió, Brazil, pp. 1855–1862.
Malmberg, J. S., & Maull, K. E. (2013). Supporting Climate Science Research With 21st Century Technologies and a Virtual Student Conference for Upper Elementary to High School Students. LEARNing Landscapes, 6 (2), 249-264.
Masters, K., Oh, E. Y., Cox, J., Simmons, B., Lintott, C., Graham, G., ... & Holmes, K. (2016). Science learning via participation in online citizen science. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.05973.
Monroe, M. C., Andrews, E., & Biedenweg, K. (2008). A framework for environmental education strategies. Applied Environmental Education & Communication, 6(3-4), 205-216.
Paige, K., Hattam, R., & Daniels, C. B. (2015). Two models for implementing Citizen Science projects in middle school. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 14(2).
Penuel, W. R., Bienkowski, M., Gallagher, L., Korbak, C., Sussex, W., Yamaguchi, R., & Fishman, B. J. (2006). GLOBE Year 10 evaluation: Into the next generation. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Rahm, J., Miller, H. C., Hartley, L., & Moore, J. C. (2003). The value of an emergent notion of authenticity: Examples from two student/teacher-scientist partnership programs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(8), 737-756.
Roy, H. E., Pocock, M. J. O., Preston, C. D., Roy, D. B., Savage, J., Tweddle, J. C., & Robinson, L. D. (2012). Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring: final report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework.
Sadler, T.D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: a critical review of the literature. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 47 (3), 235–256.
Silva, C. G., Monteiro, A., Manahl, C., Lostal, E., Holocher-Ertl, T., Andrade, N., ... & Brito, R. M. (2016). Cell Spotting: educational and motivational outcomes of cell biology citizen science project in the classroom. JCOM, 15(01), A02-2.
Schwartz, M. D., Beaubien, E. G., Crimmins, T. M., & Weltzin, J. F. (2013). North America. In Phenology: an integrative environmental science (pp. 67-89). Springer Netherlands.
Shah, H. R., & Martinez, L. R. (2016). Current approaches in implementing citizen science in the classroom. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 17(1), 17.
Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in ecology & evolution, 24(9), 467-471. Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research techniques: Techniques and
procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications.
Sullivan, B. L., Aycrigg, J. L., Barry, J. H., Bonney, R. E., Bruns, N., Cooper, C. B., ... & Fink, D. (2014). The eBird enterprise: an integrated approach to development and application of citizen science. Biological Conservation, 169, 31-40.
Tinati, R., Van Kleek, M., Simperl, E., Luczak-Rösch, M., Simpson, R., & Shadbolt, N. (2015, April). Designing for citizen data analysis: A cross-sectional case study of a multi-domain citizen science platform. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 4069-4078). ACM.
The European Citizen Science Association (ECSA) Working Group "Sharing Best Practice and Building Capacity". (2015). ECSA 10 Principles of Citizen Science. Retrieved from http://ecsa.citizen-science.net/engage-us/10-principles-citizen-science
Trautmann, N. M, Shirk J, Fee J, & Krasny M. E. (2012). Who poses the question? Using citizen science to help K–12 teachers meet the mandate for inquiry. In: Dickinson JL and Bonney R (Eds). Citizen science: public collaboration in environmental research. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wormstead, S. J., Becker, M. L., & Congalton, R. G. (2002). Tools for successful student–teacher– scientist partnerships. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(3), 277-287.
Wiggins, A. (2013). Free as in puppies: compensating for ICT constraints in citizen science. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work (pp. 1469-1480). ACM.
Yong, E. (2017). Finally: An App That Can Identify the Animal You Saw on Your Hike. The Atlantic. Retrieved from https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2017/07/
an-app-for-identifying-animals-and-plants/535014/.
Zoellick, B., Nelson, S. J., & Schauffler, M. (2012). Participatory science and education: bringing both views into focus. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 310-313.