(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 1195-1215 | Article Number: ijese.2017.078
Published Online: July 13, 2017
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the environmental literacy of K-10 student completers. The quantitative research design, specifically, the non-experimental descriptive-correlational design was used to determine the students’ level of environmental knowledge and sensitivity, identify the students’ environmental attitudes and behaviors, and determine the correlation between students’ environmental knowledge, attitudes, sensitivity, and behaviors. Exploratory factor analysis design was used to clarify the underlying dimensionality of environmental literacy of the students and to disentangle the complex interrelationships among various aspects of environmental literacy and eventually identify the variables that go together as unified concept. A total of 614 out of 759 students (81%) currently enrolled in a senior high school in one university were asked to participate in the study. Results showed that the student completers of K-10 grade levels have moderate level of environmental literacy and environmental knowledge and behavior and high level of environmental attiude and sensitivity. Students who are more knowledgeable about the environment have strong sensitivity and attitudes but do not necessarily have strong pro-environmental behaviors. Thus, although students may have pro-environment knowledge, this knowledge is not necessarily translated into positive behaviors towards the environment. Lastly, environmental literacy of the students has three broad dimensions of blended environmental attitude and sensitivity, pro-environmental behaviors and environmental knowledge. The results imply that the science curriculum and instruction in these grade levels did not fail in their instruction but much is still to be done to achieve the highest degree ofenvironmental knowledge, pro-environmental behaviors, positive environmental attitudes and environmental sensitivity.
Keywords: environmental literacy, environmental knowledge, environmental behavior, environmental attitide, environmental sensitivity
References
Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., Yilmaz, A. (2006). A study on children’s environmental knowledge and attitudes: The effect of grade level and gender. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,15, 210-223.
Bogan, M.B., &kromrey, J.D. (1996). Measuring the Environmental Literacy of High School Students. Florida
Bradley,, J.C., Waliczek, T.M., Zajicek, J.M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30 (3) (1999), pp. 17-21.
Coxhead, I. (2002). Development and the Upland Base Economic and Policy Context, and Lessons from a Philippine Watershed. Forthcoming Philippine Journal of Development, XXIV (1)
Davidson, D.J., Freudenburg, W.R. (1996). Gender and Environmental Risk Concerns: A Review and Analysis of Available Research. Environment and Behavior 28:302–29.
Department of Education (2012). K to 12 Curriculum Guide SCIENCE. Available at: . Date accessed: 16 mar. 2017.
Department of Environment and Natural Resources. (2016). Philippine Master Plan For Climate Resilient Forestry Development. Available at:. Date accessed: 16 mar. 2017.
Ejem, L.A., & Bello, A.Q. (2013). Environmental Awareness, Literacy and Biodiversity Conservation Practices of Freshmen Students in Bukidnon State University, Philippines. JPAIR Institutional Research 1(1 ).
Ejen, L.A.; Bello, A. (2013). Environmental Awareness, Literacy and Biodiversity Conservation Practices of Freshmen Students in Bukidnon State University, Philippines. JPAIR Institutional Research, [S.l.], v. 1, n. 1, oct. 2013. ISSN 2244-1816. Available at: . Date accessed: 16 mar. 2017. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7719/irj.v1i1.205.
Gambro, J.S. &Switzky, H.N. (1996). A National Survey of High School Students’ Environmental Knowledge. Journal of Environmental Education, 27(3), 28-34
Garcesa, R.D., &Limjuco, R.P. (2014). Environmental Literacy & Integration of Environmental Issues among Science teachers in Region XI: Basis for Training Design. UIC Research Journal, 20 (1).
Goldman, D., Ayalon, O.,Baum, D., &Haham, S. (2015). Major Matters: Relationship between Academic Major and University Students’ Environmental Literacy and Citizenship as Reflected in Their Voting Decisions and Environmental Activism. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(5), 671-693.
Greenpeace (2010). The Problem: The State of Freshwater Sources in the Philippines. Available at: < http://www.greenpeace.org/seasia/ph/What-we-do/Toxics/Water-Patrol/The-problem/#a1>. Date accessed: 16 mar. 2017.
Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R., Tomera, A.N. (1986). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: a meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education. 18, 1-8.
Hollweg, K. S., Taylor, J. R., Bybee, R. W., Marcinkowski, T. J., McBeth, W. C., & Zoido, P. (2011). Developing a framework for assessing environmental literacy. Washington, DC: North American Association for Environmental Education. Available at: Date accessed: 16 mar. 2017.
Hungerford, H.R., &Tomera A.N.(1977). Science in the Elementary School. Stipes Publishing Company, Champaign, I.L.
Kaiser, F.G., Wolfing, S., Fuhrer, R. (1999). Environmental Attitude and Ecological Behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19, 1-19.
Karatekin, K. (2012). Environmental Literacy in Turkey Primary Schools Social Studies Textbooks. Procedia Social& Behavioral Sciences 46 3519-3523.
Kempton, W., Boster, J.S., Harley, J.A. (1995). Environmental values in American culture. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Kollmuss, A., Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239-260.
Kuhlemeier, H.; Bergh, H.; Lagerweij, N. (1999). Environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviour in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2)4-10.
Marcinkowski, T. (2001). Predictors of responsible environmental behavior: A review of three dissertation studies. In H. Hungerford, W. Bluhm, T. Volk, and J. Ramsey (Eds.). Essential readings in environmental education. 247-276). Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing, L.L.C.
McBeth, W., Volk, T. (2010). The National Environmental Literacy Project: A baseline study of middle grades students in the United States. The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(1), 55-67.
Meinhold, J. L., & Malkus, A. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 511-532.
Mostafa, M. M. (2007a). Gender Differences in Egyptian Consumers' Green Purchase Behaviour: The Effects of Environmental Knowledge, Concern and Attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31, 220-229.
Negev, M., Garb, Y., Biller, R., Sagy, G., Tal, A. (2010). Environmental problems, causes, and solutions: an open question. The Journal of Environmental Education, 4 (2), 101-115.
Olofsson, A. & Ohman, S. (2006). General Beliefs an d Environmental Concern: Transatlantic Comparison. Environment and Behavior, 38(6): 768-790.
Peterson, N. 1982. Developmental variables affecting environmental sensitivity in professional environmental educators. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Southern llIinois University at Carbondale.
Roth, C.E. (1968). On the Road to Conservation. Massachusetts Audobon, 52 (4) 38-41
Shamuganathan, S., Karpudewan M. (2015). Modeling Environmental Literacy of Malaysian Pre-University Students. International Journal of Environmental Science Education, 10(5), 757-771.
Sivek, D.J., & Hungerford, H. (1989/90). Predictors of responsible behavior in members of three Wisconsin conservation organi zations. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35-40.
Sontay, G., Gordere, M., and Usta, E. (2015). A comparative Investigation of Sub-Components of the Environmental Literacy at the Secondary Schools Level. Journal of Turkish Science Education, Vol. 12, Issue 1
Spinola, H. (2015). Environmental Literacy between Students taught in Eco-schools & ordinary schools in the Madeira Island Region of Portugal. Science Education International, Vol. 26, Issue 3, 2015, 392-413.
Steg, L., Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309-317.
Stern, P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56 (3) 407-424.
Stern, P.C. 2005. Understanding Individuals’ Environmentally Significant Behavior. Environmental Law Institute 11: 10785–10790
Teksoz, G.,Sahin, E.,Oztekin, C.T. (2011). Modeling Environmental Literacy of University Students. J Science Educational Technology 21:157-166, DOI 10.1007/s10956-011-9294-3.
Yap. D. (2014). Philippine Daily Inquirer: “Despite improvement, air pollution levels in Metro still high—DENR”. Available at:. Date accessed: 16 mar. 2017.
Yumusak, A.,Sargin, S.A., Baltaci, F., &Kelani R.R. (2016). Science & Mathematics Teacher Candidates’ Environmental Knowledge, Awareness, Behavior and Attitudes. International Journal & Science Education, 11(6), 1337-1346
Zelezney, L., Bailey, M. (2006). A call for women to lead a different environmental movement. Organization & Environment, 19, 103-109. doi: 10.117711086026605285588.
Zelezney, L., Chua, P., Aldrich, C. (2000). Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 443-457. doi: 10.111/0022-4537.00177