(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
pp. 1055-1065 | Article Number: ijese.2017.071
Published Online: June 18, 2017
Abstract
It has given importance to the development of 21st century skills in every aspect of life. STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) education has played an important role to improve these skills and teachers are expected to be able to organize learning environments accordingly. The purpose of this research is to examine the pre-service science teachers’ views on STEM education practices. The case study method was used in this research and participants of the research are 7 pre-service science teachers (4 female, 3 male). In the research STEM activities were applied during 8 weeks. The data of this research were collected through semi-structured interviews. The content analysis was used for data analysis and data were converted to the tables. During the interviews, it was noted that the pre-service science teachers wanted to apply STEM education when they become teachers; they wanted to get advanced knowledge about STEM education. In addition, pre-service science teachers have expressed their opinions on the basic rationale, benefits and limitations of STEM education, and have made proposals for the development and dissemination of STEM education. Pre-service science teachers learned about STEM education and how to implement it, by the help of STEM education practices that was conducted within the scope of this research. Pre-service teachers who are future teachers need to be informed and trained about STEM education.
Keywords: STEM education practices, science education, pre-service science teachers’ views
References
Akbaba, C. (2017). Okullarda maker ve steam eğitim hareketlerinin incelenmesi. Master Project, Trakya University.
Akyıldız, P. (2014). Fetemm eğitimine dayalı öğrenme-öğretme yaklaşımı. In G. E. Editor (Ed.), Etkinlik örnekleriyle güncel öğrenme-öğretme yaklaşımları-I (pp. 978-605). Ankara: Pegem Akademi, 566 p.
Altan, E. B., Yamak, H., & Kırıkkaya, E. B. (2016). Hizmetöncesi öğretmen eğitiminde fetemm eğitimi uygulamaları: Tasarım temelli fen eğitimi. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 212-232.
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: challenges and opportunities. Virginia: NSTA Press, 116 p.
Cinar, S., Pirasa, N., & Sadoglu, G. P. (2016). Views of science and mathematics preservice teachers regardingstem. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(6), 1479-1487. doi:10.13189/ujer.2016.040628
Corlu, M. S., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). Introducing STEM education: implications for educating our teachers for the age of innovation. Education and Science, 39(171), 74-85.
Elliott, B., Oty, K., McArthur, J. & Clark, B. (2001). The effect of an interdisciplinary algebra/science course on students‟ problem solving skills, critical thinking skills and attitudes towards mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 32(6), 811–816.
Eroglu, S., & Bektas, O. (2016). Ideas of science teachers took stem education about STEM based activities. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education,4(3), 43-67. Retrieved from http://www.enadonline.com/0DOWNLOAD/pdfler/eng/4c3s3m.pdf
Ersoy, H. (2016). Durum çalışması. In M.Y.Ö. and L.D. Editors (Eds.), Eğitimde Üretim Tabanlı Çalışmalar için nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık, 198 p.
Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress.
Gülhan, F. & Şahin, F. (2016). The effects of science-technology-engineering-math (STEM) integration on 5th grade students’ perceptions and attitudes towards these areas. International Journal of Human Sciences, 13(1), 602-620.
Katz, L. G. (2010). STEM in the early years. STEM in.
Kennedy, T. J., & Odell, M. R. L. (2014). Engaging Students in STEM Education. Science Education International, 25(3), 246-258.
Kızılay, E. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ opinions about stem disciplines and education. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 47, 403-417. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS3464
Lee, K., & Nason, R. A. (2012). Reforming the preparation of future STEM teachers. 2nd International STEM in Education Conference (pp. 24-27), Beijing, China.
Morrison, J. (2006). TIES STEM education monograph series, attributes of STEM education. Baltimore, MD: TIES.
Olivarez, N. (2012). The impact of a STEM program on academic achievement of eighth grade students in a South Texas middle school (Doctoral dissertation, Texas A & M University).
Öner, A. T., & Capraro, R. M. (2016). Is STEM Academy Designation Synonymous with Higher Student Achievement?. Education and Science, 41(185), 1-17.
Ricks, M. M. (2006) A study of the impact of an informal science education program on middle school students’ science knowledge, science attitude, STEM high school and college course selections, and career decisions. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin.
Roberts, A. (2012). A justification for STEM education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 71(8), 1-4.
Sahin, A., Ayar, M. C. & Adıguzel, T. (2014). STEM related after-school program activities and associated outcomes on student learning. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14 (1), 309-322.
Soylu, S. (2016). STEM education in early childhood in Turkey. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 6, 38-47.
Stohlmann, M., Moore, T. J., & Roehrig, G. H. (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 2(1), 28-34.
Wagner, T. (2008). Rigor redefined. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 20–24.
Yamak, H., Bulut, N., & Dündar, S. (2014). The impact of stem activities on 5th grade students’ scientific process skills and their attitudes towards science. Gazi University Journal of Gazi Educational Faculty, 34(2), 249-265.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 448 p.
Yıldırım, B., & Altun, Y. (2015). STEM Eğitim ve Mühendislik Uygulamalarının Fen Bilgisi Laboratuar Dersindeki Etkilerinin İncelenmesi. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering, 2(2), 28-40.
Yıldırım, B., & Selvi, M. (2016). Examination of the effects of STEM education integrated as a part of science, technology, society and environment courses. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 3684-3695.