This research aims at revealing (1) the suitability of physics e-scaffolding teaching media with mathematical and image/diagrammatic representation, as well as (2) the effectiveness of the e-scaffolding teaching media with mathematical and image/diagrammatic representation to improve students’ problem solving ability and scientific attitude. It is a research and development adapting Borg and Gall model which consists of five stages: (1) preliminary study; (2) planning; (3) product development (production, validation & revision); (4) limited trial and product revision, field testing and product revision; and (5) dissemination. The instruments applied in this research comprise validation form, lesson plan implementation observation form, students’ response questionnaire, teacher interview form, problem solving ability test, and scientific attitude observation form. The subject of this research is the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 2 Wonosari. The respondents of this research consisted of six validators, 24 students for thelimited test, and 48 students for field testing. This research produced physics e-scaffolding teaching media equipped with lesson plans, students worksheets, problem solving ability test, and scientific attitude observation form. The result of the validation shows that physics e-scaffolding teaching media developed in this research issuitable to be implemented and categorized as “very good.”The result of the test shows that this teaching media fulfills the criteria of effectiveness. Based on the MANOVA test, it can be concluded that there is a difference between problem solving ability and scientific attitude in the experiment class and the control group. Thus, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in the gain of problem solving ability and scientific attitude among the students who participated in the learning process using physics e-scaffolding media and other media developed in accordance with the devices used by the teachers.

Aiken, L.R. (1985). Three coefficient for analyzing the realiability and validity of rating. Education and psychological measurement, 131-142.

Albe, V., Venturini, P., & Lascours, J. (2001) Electromagnetic Concepts in MathematicalRepresentation of Physics [Electronic version]. Journal of Science Education and Technology, Springer Verlag (Germany), 2001, 10 (2), pp. 197-203.

Alwan, A.A. (2011). Misconception of Heat and Temperature among Physics Students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences 12 (2011) 600–614.

Amiripour, P., Mofidi, S.A., & Shahvarani, A. (2012). Scaffolding as effective method for mathematical learning [electronic version]. Indian Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5 No. 9 (2012).

Amiroh. (2012), Membangun E-Learning dengan Learning Management System, Genta Group Production: Sidoarjo.

Anderson, D. and Nashon, S. (2006). Predators of Knowledge Construction: Interpreting Students’ Metacognition in an Amusement Park Physics Program. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Sci Ed 91: 298–320, 2007.

Azevedo, R., Cromley, J.G., Moos, D.C., Greene, J.A., & Winters, F.I. (2011). Adaptive content and process scaffolding: a key facilitating students’ self-regulated learning with hypermedia. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, Volume 53, 2011 (1), 106-140.

Baser, M. (2006). Effect of Conceptual Change Oriented Instruction on Students’ Understanding of Heat and Temperature Concepts. Journal Maltese Education Research. Vol:4 No.1 2006 64-79.

Benjamin D. Jee & Florencia K. Anggoro. (2012). Introduction to The Special Issue: Learning and Instruction in The Natural Sciences. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 5(1), 1-4.

Borg, W.R. and Gall, M.D. (1983). Edicational Research: An Introduction. (4thed). New York: LongmanInc.

Borich, G. D. (1994). Observation Skills for Effective Teaching. The University of Texas: USA

Chang, K. E., Sung, Y. T., & Chen, S. F. (2001). Learning Through Computer-Based Concept Mapping with Scaffolding Aid [electronic version]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 21-33.

Ching Hue Chen.(2014). An adaptive scaffolding e-learning system for middle school students’ physics learning [electronic version]. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 2014, 30(3).

Davis, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scaffolding Students' Knowledge Integration: Prompts for Reflection in KIE [electronic version]. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 819-837.

Djemari Mardapi. (2008). Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Non Tes. Yogyakarta: Mitra Cendikia Press.

Hake, R.R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. Dept. of Physics Indiana University.

Halim, L., Tan Kia Young, & Meerah, T.S.M. (2014). Overcoming Students’ Misconceptions on Forces in Equilibrium: An Action Research Study. Creative Education, 2014, 5, 1032-1042. Accessed on 5 August 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.511117.

Heller, K., & Heller, P. (2010). Cooperative Problem Solving in Physics A User’s Manual. U.S. Departement of Education: University of Minnesota.

Hoellwarth, C., Moelter, M. J., & Knight, R. D. (2005). A Direct Comparison of Conceptual Learn­ing and Problem Solving Ability in Tradi­tional and Studio Style Classrooms. American Journal of Physics, 73, 459 (2005).Accessed on 7 April 2015, http://scitation.aip.org/content/aapt/journal/ajp/73/5/10.1119/1.1862633.

Hughes, F.P. & Diane. M. (2010). Child, play, and development (4th ed.). London: Sage.

Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting problem solving in PBL [electronic version]. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2).

Kohl, P. B. & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 4 (1), 010111.Accessed on 9 September 2015,http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111.

Menteri. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 69, Tahun 2013, tentang Kerangka Dasar dan Struktur Kurikulum Sekolah Menengah Atas/Madrasah Aliyah.

Mirahmadi, S.H. & Alavi, S.M. (2016). The Role of Traditional and Virtual Scaffolding in Developing Speaking Ability of Iranian EFL Learners[electronic version]. International Journal of English Linguistics; Vol. 6, No. 2; 2016.

Nashon, S. & Nielsen, W. S. (2007). Factors Impacting Students' Decisions around Physics 12. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematicals and Technology Education, 7 (2 & 3), 93-106. Accessed on July15, 2015, http://ro.uow.edu.au/edupapers/718/

OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 result: what students know and can do, 1, 1-556.

Partnership for 21st Century. (2008). 21st Century Skills, Education, Competitiveness.

Podolefsky, N.S. & Finkelstein, N.D. (2007). Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: An example from electromagnetic waves. Physical review special topics - physics education research 3, 010109 (2007). Accessed onAugust8, 2015,http://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.010109

Podolefsky, N.S. & Finkelstein, N.D. (2007). Analogical scaffolding and the learning of abstract ideas in physics: Empirical studies. Physical review special topics – physics education research 3, 020104 (2007). Accessed on August8, 2015,http://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.3.020104

Podolefsky, N.S., Moore, E.B., & Perkins, K.K. (2013). Implicit scaffolding in interactive simulations: Design strategies to support multiple educational goals. Cornell University Library arXiv:1306.6544.

Presiden. (2012). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 8 Tahun 2012 tentang Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia.

Raes, A., et al. (2012). Scaffolding information problem solving in web-based collaborative inquiry learning [electronic version]. Computers & Education Volume 59, Issue 1, 82-94.

Redish, E.F. (2004). A Theoretical Framework for Phys­ics Education Research: Modeling Student Thinking. The Proceedings of the Enrico Fermi Summer School in Physics, Course CLVI, Italian Physical Society 2004.

Riad, A.M. & El-Ghareeb H.A. (2008). A service oriented architecture to integrate mobile assessment in learning management systems. Turkish online journal of distance education, Vol. 9, No. 2.Accessed on August9, 2015 fromhttp://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED501112

Ringenberg, M.A., & Van Lehn, K. (2006). Scaffolding Problem Solving with Annotated, Worked-Out Examples to Promote Deep Learning [electronic version]. Intelligent Tutoring systems Volume 4053 of the series Lecture Notes in Computer Science pp 625-634.

Rosengrant, D., Etkina, E., & Heuvelen, A.V. (2009). Do students use and understand free-body diagrams.  Journal Physics  Education Research, Volume 1, No.01.40. Accessed on August 8, 2015,http://journals.aps.org/prper/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.5.010108

Saifudin Azwar. (2011). Tes prestasi fungsi dan pengembangan pengukuran prestasi belajar edisi II. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Saleh, S. (2011). The Level of B.Sc.Ed Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Physics. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences October 2011, Vol. 1, No. 3 ISSN: 2222-6990.

Santrock, J.W. (2011). Educational psychology. New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Sari, D., & Sugiyarto, K. (2015). Pengembangan multimedia berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan motivasi belajar dan kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(2), 153 - 166.

Sekar, P. & Mani,S. (2013). Science Attitude of Higher Secondary Students.Paripex - indian journal of research Volume: 2, Issued on 11, Nov 2013.

Sherin, G. (2001). How students understand physics equations. Journal Cognition and Instruction, 19(4), 479-541. Accessed on August8, 2015 dari http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S1532690XCI1904_3

Suartama, I. K., & Trasta, I. D. K. (2014). E-learning Berbasis Moodle. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Von Aufschnaiter, C., & Rogge, C. (2010). Misconceptions or Missing Conceptions? Eurasia Journal of Mathematicals, Science & Technology Education, 2010, 6(1), 3-18.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: the Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Yilmaz, I. (2012). Does science literacy cover understanding? An analysis over Turkish education curriculum. International Journal of Applied Science and TechnologyVol. 2 No. 1; January 2012.